Originally posted by: kalster
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: flxnimprtmscl
Eh, I don't see this dropping them out of the Sugar Bowl. It should though. I don't see how you should be able to compete for the National Title when you can't even win your own conference. We saw this a couple years ago when Oregon got screwed so Nebraska (who didn't win their conference) could go have the pleasure of getting their asses handed to them by Miami. Such a screwed up system :|
Then again, I'm not 1/10th of the college fans you guys are so I could be way off...
No, you are correct. This why the BCS is BS.
Every system but a playoff system is BS. But I still have no doubts that OU would beat either LSU or USC. You cant judge them by one game, even if its late in the season. USC lost to Cal for christs sake.
And hell, Kansas State lost to Marshall. Then OU just lost to Kansas State. How does ANY of it make sense.
exactly
u hit it right on the head
this moron complaing about Cal beating USC needs to shut up for good
Okay Mr USC fan whos team played freaking NO ONE, or importance besides Washington St. Losing to Cal while having a EASY schedule. Lets see a loss to a patsy unranked team, or a loss to a #15 team. Hmmmm. Or better yet, USC played more patsies than OU, or LSU. hell might have played more than both combined.
USC has been overanked all season. LSU has been under ranked all season. OU should not be punished for losing late in the season. And know what, they wont. OU should still be in the Sugar Bowl, if Boise State wins, LSU will meet them their for an LSU home game. Where LSU will get spanked. While USC gets spanked hardcore by Michigan.
If LSU loses to OU, and USC loses to Michigan everyone better shut the fvck up.
Yes we know the BCS is fvcked. But OU IMHO is still the team to beat for the title.