OU getting beat 21-7

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

digitalsm

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2003
5,253
0
0
Originally posted by: kalster
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: kalster
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: kalster
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: flxnimprtmscl
Eh, I don't see this dropping them out of the Sugar Bowl. It should though. I don't see how you should be able to compete for the National Title when you can't even win your own conference. We saw this a couple years ago when Oregon got screwed so Nebraska (who didn't win their conference) could go have the pleasure of getting their asses handed to them by Miami. Such a screwed up system :|

Then again, I'm not 1/10th of the college fans you guys are so I could be way off...

No, you are correct. This why the BCS is BS.

Every system but a playoff system is BS. But I still have no doubts that OU would beat either LSU or USC. You cant judge them by one game, even if its late in the season. USC lost to Cal for christs sake.

And hell, Kansas State lost to Marshall. Then OU just lost to Kansas State. How does ANY of it make sense.

exactly

u hit it right on the head

this moron complaing about Cal beating USC needs to shut up for good

Okay Mr USC fan whos team played freaking NO ONE, or importance besides Washington St. Losing to Cal while having a EASY schedule. Lets see a loss to a patsy unranked team, or a loss to a #15 team. Hmmmm. Or better yet, USC played more patsies than OU, or LSU. hell might have played more than both combined.

USC has been overanked all season. LSU has been under ranked all season. OU should not be punished for losing late in the season. And know what, they wont. OU should still be in the Sugar Bowl, if Boise State wins, LSU will meet them their for an LSU home game. Where LSU will get spanked. While USC gets spanked hardcore by Michigan.

If LSU loses to OU, and USC loses to Michigan everyone better shut the fvck up.

Yes we know the BCS is fvcked. But OU IMHO is still the team to beat for the title.

who exactly has OU played

OU played 4 teams with losing records


USC played 5 teams with loosing records


USC lost EARLIER in hte season by 3 points

OU lost in the last game, and got spanked


OU beat 3 ranked teams

USC beat 2

watz ur point


i dont see how you can discount a total spanking and give more importance to a 3 point loss to a lower ranked team much earlier on

and dont bring in margin of victory usc has scored just as many points

yeah USC lost to Cal, an unranked patsy 6 LOSS Team. Thats a much worse loss than a loss to a #15 3 loss team.

Your point?

Face it, Boise State is going own Hawaii. OU will be ranked #2 in the BCS, LSU #1. USC #3, and USC will go on an get their asses spanked by Michigan. LSU and USC will lose their bowl games, and that should quite the bitching.

lost by 3 points in 3 ovetimes means more to u than a 28 point blow out by a team claiming to have the best offense and defense in the nation, gimem a break


Cal 6 loss team. K-State 3 loss team.

Yes a loss to a fvcking PATSY TEAM should be considered worse than a blow out by a #15 team. Every team has a bad game, the entire season should be factored in. This is why a playoff system is a MUST. OU is still better than LSU, and USC. LSU is better than USC. LSU and OU will meet up in the Sugar bowl, early projections, show LSU not even needing the Boise State win to jump USC, and well every BCS expert has OU pegged.

Quit your crying, and I dont want to hear any bitching once USC gets beat by Michigan at the Rose Bowl.
 

digitalsm

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2003
5,253
0
0
This is what it comes down to. Does OU deserve to be ranked below Texas, a team they demolished.

No.
 

dcpsoguy

Diamond Member
Nov 5, 2000
3,252
0
0
LSU and OU in the national championship. I think LSU can hold its own.

Tough pick between USC and Michigan. I'd have to go with Michigan, as USC seemed to have a little trouble in the defensive yardage department(500+ against).
 

Crusty

Lifer
Sep 30, 2001
12,684
2
81
Originally posted by: digitalsm
This is what it comes down to. Does OU deserve to be ranked below Texas, a team they demolished.

No.

I never said OU should be ranked below Texas, I just think that we should goto a BS Bowl. OU is a better team then us, they are the best in the Nation...no doubt. They hsould have just won the game and everythign would have been great.

I think they lost just to push us out of going to a BCS Bowl...


*cries*
 

digitalsm

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2003
5,253
0
0
Originally posted by: MCrusty
Originally posted by: digitalsm
This is what it comes down to. Does OU deserve to be ranked below Texas, a team they demolished.

No.

I never said OU should be ranked below Texas, I just think that we should goto a BS Bowl. OU is a better team then us, they are the best in the Nation...no doubt. They hsould have just won the game and everythign would have been great.

I think they lost just to push us out of going to a BCS Bowl...


*cries*

Im not talking to you. Im talking to the USC whiners.
 

austin316

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2001
3,572
0
0
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: kalster
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: kalster
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: kalster
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: flxnimprtmscl
Eh, I don't see this dropping them out of the Sugar Bowl. It should though. I don't see how you should be able to compete for the National Title when you can't even win your own conference. We saw this a couple years ago when Oregon got screwed so Nebraska (who didn't win their conference) could go have the pleasure of getting their asses handed to them by Miami. Such a screwed up system :|

Then again, I'm not 1/10th of the college fans you guys are so I could be way off...

No, you are correct. This why the BCS is BS.

Every system but a playoff system is BS. But I still have no doubts that OU would beat either LSU or USC. You cant judge them by one game, even if its late in the season. USC lost to Cal for christs sake.

And hell, Kansas State lost to Marshall. Then OU just lost to Kansas State. How does ANY of it make sense.

exactly

u hit it right on the head

this moron complaing about Cal beating USC needs to shut up for good

Okay Mr USC fan whos team played freaking NO ONE, or importance besides Washington St. Losing to Cal while having a EASY schedule. Lets see a loss to a patsy unranked team, or a loss to a #15 team. Hmmmm. Or better yet, USC played more patsies than OU, or LSU. hell might have played more than both combined.

USC has been overanked all season. LSU has been under ranked all season. OU should not be punished for losing late in the season. And know what, they wont. OU should still be in the Sugar Bowl, if Boise State wins, LSU will meet them their for an LSU home game. Where LSU will get spanked. While USC gets spanked hardcore by Michigan.

If LSU loses to OU, and USC loses to Michigan everyone better shut the fvck up.

Yes we know the BCS is fvcked. But OU IMHO is still the team to beat for the title.

who exactly has OU played

OU played 4 teams with losing records


USC played 5 teams with loosing records


USC lost EARLIER in hte season by 3 points

OU lost in the last game, and got spanked


OU beat 3 ranked teams

USC beat 2

watz ur point


i dont see how you can discount a total spanking and give more importance to a 3 point loss to a lower ranked team much earlier on

and dont bring in margin of victory usc has scored just as many points

yeah USC lost to Cal, an unranked patsy 6 LOSS Team. Thats a much worse loss than a loss to a #15 3 loss team.

Your point?

Face it, Boise State is going own Hawaii. OU will be ranked #2 in the BCS, LSU #1. USC #3, and USC will go on an get their asses spanked by Michigan. LSU and USC will lose their bowl games, and that should quite the bitching.

lost by 3 points in 3 ovetimes means more to u than a 28 point blow out by a team claiming to have the best offense and defense in the nation, gimem a break


Cal 6 loss team. K-State 3 loss team.

Yes a loss to a fvcking PATSY TEAM should be considered worse than a blow out by a #15 team. Every team has a bad game, the entire season should be factored in. This is why a playoff system is a MUST. OU is still better than LSU, and USC. LSU is better than USC. LSU and OU will meet up in the Sugar bowl, early projections, show LSU not even needing the Boise State win to jump USC, and well every BCS expert has OU pegged.

Quit your crying, and I dont want to hear any bitching once USC gets beat by Michigan at the Rose Bowl.

First off, I agree, that I would definetely like to see a USC vs. LSU matchup. This same scenario happened a couple a years ago, with Nebraska getting blown out in the championship, but still going to the BCS title game, where they got spanked too.

With that being said, USC only played TWO ranked teams. Michigan and OSU both played SEVEN!!! You wanna tell me you take away five ranked opponents from them and toss in some cup cakes like Stanford and they still lose 2 games!!! BS!! USC should be happy they even give the PAC 10 any respect at all. What did you finish in the bowl games last year? 2-4 or something?

 

sciencewhiz

Diamond Member
Jun 30, 2000
5,885
8
81
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Cal 6 loss team. K-State 3 loss team.

Yes a loss to a fvcking PATSY TEAM should be considered worse than a blow out by a #15 team. Every team has a bad game, the entire season should be factored in.

What is the cutoff for being a patsy team? 4 losses? being unranked? some arbitrary criteria to make your team look the best?
 

Crusty

Lifer
Sep 30, 2001
12,684
2
81
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: MCrusty
Originally posted by: digitalsm
This is what it comes down to. Does OU deserve to be ranked below Texas, a team they demolished.

No.

I never said OU should be ranked below Texas, I just think that we should goto a BS Bowl. OU is a better team then us, they are the best in the Nation...no doubt. They hsould have just won the game and everythign would have been great.

I think they lost just to push us out of going to a BCS Bowl...


*cries*

Im not talking to you. Im talking to the USC whiners.



Good :beer:
 

austin316

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2001
3,572
0
0
They really, really need a 4 team playoff. Michigan vs. USC, OU vs. LSU and then the winners play each other on like the 11th or something.
 

digitalsm

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2003
5,253
0
0
Originally posted by: MCrusty
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: MCrusty
Originally posted by: digitalsm
This is what it comes down to. Does OU deserve to be ranked below Texas, a team they demolished.

No.

I never said OU should be ranked below Texas, I just think that we should goto a BS Bowl. OU is a better team then us, they are the best in the Nation...no doubt. They hsould have just won the game and everythign would have been great.

I think they lost just to push us out of going to a BCS Bowl...


*cries*

Im not talking to you. Im talking to the USC whiners.



Good :beer:

Looks like Texas is going to get ripped off and sent to the Holiday Bowl :(

Anyone know what time the AP poll typically comes out?
 

Excelsior

Lifer
May 30, 2002
19,047
18
81
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: kalster
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: kalster
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: kalster
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: flxnimprtmscl
Eh, I don't see this dropping them out of the Sugar Bowl. It should though. I don't see how you should be able to compete for the National Title when you can't even win your own conference. We saw this a couple years ago when Oregon got screwed so Nebraska (who didn't win their conference) could go have the pleasure of getting their asses handed to them by Miami. Such a screwed up system :|

Then again, I'm not 1/10th of the college fans you guys are so I could be way off...

No, you are correct. This why the BCS is BS.

Every system but a playoff system is BS. But I still have no doubts that OU would beat either LSU or USC. You cant judge them by one game, even if its late in the season. USC lost to Cal for christs sake.

And hell, Kansas State lost to Marshall. Then OU just lost to Kansas State. How does ANY of it make sense.

exactly

u hit it right on the head

this moron complaing about Cal beating USC needs to shut up for good

Okay Mr USC fan whos team played freaking NO ONE, or importance besides Washington St. Losing to Cal while having a EASY schedule. Lets see a loss to a patsy unranked team, or a loss to a #15 team. Hmmmm. Or better yet, USC played more patsies than OU, or LSU. hell might have played more than both combined.

USC has been overanked all season. LSU has been under ranked all season. OU should not be punished for losing late in the season. And know what, they wont. OU should still be in the Sugar Bowl, if Boise State wins, LSU will meet them their for an LSU home game. Where LSU will get spanked. While USC gets spanked hardcore by Michigan.

If LSU loses to OU, and USC loses to Michigan everyone better shut the fvck up.

Yes we know the BCS is fvcked. But OU IMHO is still the team to beat for the title.

who exactly has OU played

OU played 4 teams with losing records


USC played 5 teams with loosing records


USC lost EARLIER in hte season by 3 points

OU lost in the last game, and got spanked


OU beat 3 ranked teams

USC beat 2

watz ur point


i dont see how you can discount a total spanking and give more importance to a 3 point loss to a lower ranked team much earlier on

and dont bring in margin of victory usc has scored just as many points

yeah USC lost to Cal, an unranked patsy 6 LOSS Team. Thats a much worse loss than a loss to a #15 3 loss team.

Your point?

Face it, Boise State is going own Hawaii. OU will be ranked #2 in the BCS, LSU #1. USC #3, and USC will go on an get their asses spanked by Michigan. LSU and USC will lose their bowl games, and that should quite the bitching.

lost by 3 points in 3 ovetimes means more to u than a 28 point blow out by a team claiming to have the best offense and defense in the nation, gimem a break


Cal 6 loss team. K-State 3 loss team.

Yes a loss to a fvcking PATSY TEAM should be considered worse than a blow out by a #15 team. Every team has a bad game, the entire season should be factored in. This is why a playoff system is a MUST. OU is still better than LSU, and USC. LSU is better than USC. LSU and OU will meet up in the Sugar bowl, early projections, show LSU not even needing the Boise State win to jump USC, and well every BCS expert has OU pegged.

Quit your crying, and I dont want to hear any bitching once USC gets beat by Michigan at the Rose Bowl.

Wow you're a dipsh!t. You don't seem to understand that a team thought to be the 1st in the nation lost by 28 to a team ranked 15, late in the season when they should've played better than any other game during the season. USC only lost to an unranked team by 3, early in the season, when teams are still getting their bearings. I don't see your logic.

If "every team has a bad game" then I'd have to say OU's bad game is far worse than USC's "bad game". I do agree that a playoff system is an absolute must, but without one in use now, how can you say that OU is better than LSU and USC if they've never played against eachother. Those BCS experts can suck my penis.

I am not crying, since I am not a fan of any of these teams. I just want the better teams to play in the championship game, and the BCS to die.
 

SNPELY

Member
Jan 9, 2001
127
0
76
I feel sorry for Texas:( Oklahoma got what was coming to them. After stealing the K-State coaching staff and seeing how the Oklahoma fans acted the last time they beat K-State in Manhattan?oh how this is sweet.
 

kalster

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2002
7,355
6
81
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: kalster
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: kalster
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: kalster
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: flxnimprtmscl
Eh, I don't see this dropping them out of the Sugar Bowl. It should though. I don't see how you should be able to compete for the National Title when you can't even win your own conference. We saw this a couple years ago when Oregon got screwed so Nebraska (who didn't win their conference) could go have the pleasure of getting their asses handed to them by Miami. Such a screwed up system :|

Then again, I'm not 1/10th of the college fans you guys are so I could be way off...

No, you are correct. This why the BCS is BS.

Every system but a playoff system is BS. But I still have no doubts that OU would beat either LSU or USC. You cant judge them by one game, even if its late in the season. USC lost to Cal for christs sake.

And hell, Kansas State lost to Marshall. Then OU just lost to Kansas State. How does ANY of it make sense.

exactly

u hit it right on the head

this moron complaing about Cal beating USC needs to shut up for good

Okay Mr USC fan whos team played freaking NO ONE, or importance besides Washington St. Losing to Cal while having a EASY schedule. Lets see a loss to a patsy unranked team, or a loss to a #15 team. Hmmmm. Or better yet, USC played more patsies than OU, or LSU. hell might have played more than both combined.

USC has been overanked all season. LSU has been under ranked all season. OU should not be punished for losing late in the season. And know what, they wont. OU should still be in the Sugar Bowl, if Boise State wins, LSU will meet them their for an LSU home game. Where LSU will get spanked. While USC gets spanked hardcore by Michigan.

If LSU loses to OU, and USC loses to Michigan everyone better shut the fvck up.

Yes we know the BCS is fvcked. But OU IMHO is still the team to beat for the title.

who exactly has OU played

OU played 4 teams with losing records


USC played 5 teams with loosing records


USC lost EARLIER in hte season by 3 points

OU lost in the last game, and got spanked


OU beat 3 ranked teams

USC beat 2

watz ur point


i dont see how you can discount a total spanking and give more importance to a 3 point loss to a lower ranked team much earlier on

and dont bring in margin of victory usc has scored just as many points

yeah USC lost to Cal, an unranked patsy 6 LOSS Team. Thats a much worse loss than a loss to a #15 3 loss team.

Your point?

Face it, Boise State is going own Hawaii. OU will be ranked #2 in the BCS, LSU #1. USC #3, and USC will go on an get their asses spanked by Michigan. LSU and USC will lose their bowl games, and that should quite the bitching.

lost by 3 points in 3 ovetimes means more to u than a 28 point blow out by a team claiming to have the best offense and defense in the nation, gimem a break


Cal 6 loss team. K-State 3 loss team.

Yes a loss to a fvcking PATSY TEAM should be considered worse than a blow out by a #15 team. Every team has a bad game, the entire season should be factored in. This is why a playoff system is a MUST. OU is still better than LSU, and USC. LSU is better than USC. LSU and OU will meet up in the Sugar bowl, early projections, show LSU not even needing the Boise State win to jump USC, and well every BCS expert has OU pegged.

Quit your crying, and I dont want to hear any bitching once USC gets beat by Michigan at the Rose Bowl.

Wow you're a dipsh!t . You don't seem to understand that a team thought to be the 1st in the nation lost by 28 to a team ranked 15, late in the season when they should've played better than any other game during the season. USC only lost to an unranked team by 3, early in the season, when teams are still getting their bearings. I don't see your logic.

If "every team has a bad game" then I'd have to say OU's bad game is far worse than USC's "bad game". I do agree that a playoff system is an absolute must, but without one in use now, how can you say that OU is better than LSU and USC if they've never played against eachother. Those BCS experts can suck my penis.

I am not crying, since I am not a fan of any of these teams. I just want the better teams to play in the championship game, and the BCS to die.


good post
 

shiner

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
17,112
1
0
Originally posted by: SNPELY
I feel sorry for Texas:( Oklahoma got what was coming to them. After stealing the K-State coaching staff and seeing how the Oklahoma fans acted the last time they beat K-State in Manhattan?oh how this is sweet.


rolleye.gif
 

cmdavid

Diamond Member
May 23, 2001
4,114
0
0
Originally posted by: digitalsm
This is what it comes down to. Does OU deserve to be ranked below Texas, a team they demolished.

No.

why not? FSU is ranked ahead of Miami... and Miami dominated FSU earlier this year...
 

Mookow

Lifer
Apr 24, 2001
10,162
0
0
Originally posted by: kalster
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Wow you're a dipsh!t . You don't seem to understand that a team thought to be the 1st in the nation lost by 28 to a team ranked 15, late in the season when they should've played better than any other game during the season. USC only lost to an unranked team by 3, early in the season, when teams are still getting their bearings. I don't see your logic.

If "every team has a bad game" then I'd have to say OU's bad game is far worse than USC's "bad game". I do agree that a playoff system is an absolute must, but without one in use now, how can you say that OU is better than LSU and USC if they've never played against eachother. Those BCS experts can suck my penis.

I am not crying, since I am not a fan of any of these teams. I just want the better teams to play in the championship game, and the BCS to die.


good post

Would you cut out some of the quotes already?!? Its annoying as sh!t
 

kalster

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2002
7,355
6
81
Originally posted by: Mookow
Originally posted by: kalster
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Wow you're a dipsh!t . You don't seem to understand that a team thought to be the 1st in the nation lost by 28 to a team ranked 15, late in the season when they should've played better than any other game during the season. USC only lost to an unranked team by 3, early in the season, when teams are still getting their bearings. I don't see your logic.

If "every team has a bad game" then I'd have to say OU's bad game is far worse than USC's "bad game". I do agree that a playoff system is an absolute must, but without one in use now, how can you say that OU is better than LSU and USC if they've never played against eachother. Those BCS experts can suck my penis.

I am not crying, since I am not a fan of any of these teams. I just want the better teams to play in the championship game, and the BCS to die.


good post

Would you cut out some of the quotes already?!? Its annoying as sh!t


sorry about that
 

digitalsm

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2003
5,253
0
0
Originally posted by: cmdavid
Originally posted by: digitalsm
This is what it comes down to. Does OU deserve to be ranked below Texas, a team they demolished.

No.

why not? FSU is ranked ahead of Miami... and Miami dominated FSU earlier this year...

Uh yes but umm OU is a 1 loss team who dominated Texas. Miami and FSU both have 2 losses, and Miami didnt blow out FSU. So slightlydifferent. I probably should havesaid. Should a 1 loss team who blew out Texas, rank below a 2 loss Texas team.

No. OU blew out Texas and has 1 less loss than Texas. There is no way OU should be ranked lower than Texas.
 

digitalsm

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2003
5,253
0
0
Originally posted by: kalster
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: kalster
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: kalster
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: kalster
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: digitalsm
Originally posted by: Excelsior
Originally posted by: flxnimprtmscl
Eh, I don't see this dropping them out of the Sugar Bowl. It should though. I don't see how you should be able to compete for the National Title when you can't even win your own conference. We saw this a couple years ago when Oregon got screwed so Nebraska (who didn't win their conference) could go have the pleasure of getting their asses handed to them by Miami. Such a screwed up system :|

Then again, I'm not 1/10th of the college fans you guys are so I could be way off...

No, you are correct. This why the BCS is BS.

Every system but a playoff system is BS. But I still have no doubts that OU would beat either LSU or USC. You cant judge them by one game, even if its late in the season. USC lost to Cal for christs sake.

And hell, Kansas State lost to Marshall. Then OU just lost to Kansas State. How does ANY of it make sense.

exactly

u hit it right on the head

this moron complaing about Cal beating USC needs to shut up for good

Okay Mr USC fan whos team played freaking NO ONE, or importance besides Washington St. Losing to Cal while having a EASY schedule. Lets see a loss to a patsy unranked team, or a loss to a #15 team. Hmmmm. Or better yet, USC played more patsies than OU, or LSU. hell might have played more than both combined.

USC has been overanked all season. LSU has been under ranked all season. OU should not be punished for losing late in the season. And know what, they wont. OU should still be in the Sugar Bowl, if Boise State wins, LSU will meet them their for an LSU home game. Where LSU will get spanked. While USC gets spanked hardcore by Michigan.

If LSU loses to OU, and USC loses to Michigan everyone better shut the fvck up.

Yes we know the BCS is fvcked. But OU IMHO is still the team to beat for the title.

who exactly has OU played

OU played 4 teams with losing records


USC played 5 teams with loosing records


USC lost EARLIER in hte season by 3 points

OU lost in the last game, and got spanked


OU beat 3 ranked teams

USC beat 2

watz ur point


i dont see how you can discount a total spanking and give more importance to a 3 point loss to a lower ranked team much earlier on

and dont bring in margin of victory usc has scored just as many points

yeah USC lost to Cal, an unranked patsy 6 LOSS Team. Thats a much worse loss than a loss to a #15 3 loss team.

Your point?

Face it, Boise State is going own Hawaii. OU will be ranked #2 in the BCS, LSU #1. USC #3, and USC will go on an get their asses spanked by Michigan. LSU and USC will lose their bowl games, and that should quite the bitching.

lost by 3 points in 3 ovetimes means more to u than a 28 point blow out by a team claiming to have the best offense and defense in the nation, gimem a break


Cal 6 loss team. K-State 3 loss team.

Yes a loss to a fvcking PATSY TEAM should be considered worse than a blow out by a #15 team. Every team has a bad game, the entire season should be factored in. This is why a playoff system is a MUST. OU is still better than LSU, and USC. LSU is better than USC. LSU and OU will meet up in the Sugar bowl, early projections, show LSU not even needing the Boise State win to jump USC, and well every BCS expert has OU pegged.

Quit your crying, and I dont want to hear any bitching once USC gets beat by Michigan at the Rose Bowl.

Wow you're a dipsh!t . You don't seem to understand that a team thought to be the 1st in the nation lost by 28 to a team ranked 15, late in the season when they should've played better than any other game during the season. USC only lost to an unranked team by 3, early in the season, when teams are still getting their bearings. I don't see your logic.

If "every team has a bad game" then I'd have to say OU's bad game is far worse than USC's "bad game". I do agree that a playoff system is an absolute must, but without one in use now, how can you say that OU is better than LSU and USC if they've never played against eachother. Those BCS experts can suck my penis.

I am not crying, since I am not a fan of any of these teams. I just want the better teams to play in the championship game, and the BCS to die.


good post


Early season losses should count JUST AS MUCH as a late season loss plain and simple. A loss if a fvcking loss. Teams shouldnt be punished for losing late in the season. Whats funny is, if OU lost to Texas Tech, and beat Kansas State, no one would question anything. A loss is a fvcking loss for christs sake, and yes a loss to a fvcking scrub patsy sorry ass 6 loss Pac 10 team is worse than a loss to a 3 loss #15 team. It doesnt matter the score. Everyone always says, thats why the play the game. Yeah and for christs sake for the final time a LOSS IS A MOTHER FVCKING LOSS, shouldnt matter when it comes. OU is still the best team in college football, and USC whiners will be served a plate full of crow when Michigan hands them their over rated asses.
 

SNPELY

Member
Jan 9, 2001
127
0
76
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: SNPELY
I feel sorry for Texas:( Oklahoma got what was coming to them. After stealing the K-State coaching staff and seeing how the Oklahoma fans acted the last time they beat K-State in Manhattan?oh how this is sweet.


rolleye.gif


While I'm not an avid K-State fan I can say the majority of people I meet in Aggieville after Oklahoma beat K-State were like ?Oklahoma is a dynasty and some little team like the Wildcats will never hold a flame to them?.
 

kalster

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2002
7,355
6
81
Early season losses should count JUST AS MUCH as a late season loss plain and simple. A loss if a fvcking loss. Teams shouldnt be punished for losing late in the season. Whats funny is, if OU lost to Texas Tech, and beat Kansas State, no one would question anything. A loss is a fvcking loss for christs sake, and yes a loss to a fvcking scrub patsy sorry ass 6 loss Pac 10 team is worse than a loss to a 3 loss #15 team. It doesnt matter the score. Everyone always says, thats why the play the game. Yeah and for christs sake for the final time a LOSS IS A MOTHER FVCKING LOSS, shouldnt matter when it comes. OU is still the best team in college football, and USC whiners will be served a plate full of crow when Michigan hands them their over rated asses.

just like oU was handed their overrated ass today?
 

kalster

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2002
7,355
6
81
Early season losses should count JUST AS MUCH as a late season loss plain and simple. A loss if a fvcking loss. Teams shouldnt be punished for losing late in the season. Whats funny is, if OU lost to Texas Tech, and beat Kansas State, no one would question anything. A loss is a fvcking loss for christs sake, and yes a loss to a fvcking scrub patsy sorry ass 6 loss Pac 10 team is worse than a loss to a 3 loss #15 team. It doesnt matter the score. Everyone always says, thats why the play the game. Yeah and for christs sake for the final time a LOSS IS A MOTHER FVCKING LOSS, shouldnt matter when it comes. OU is still the best team in college football, and USC whiners will be served a plate full of crow when Michigan hands them their over rated asses.



watz funny is OU fans keep talking about their marging of victory over candy asses like texas a&m but the loss of marging doesnt count anymore , i can see the logic in that