• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

On the subject of conservative gloating over the Trump win:

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
SP33Demon said:
This is close. I mean, look at all the fucktards in this forum who claimed I was stupid, blah blah blah for supporting Trump and they all have egg on their faces. My ego has been bolstered by 1000x after Trump won and for good reason. Through all of the harassment, I (and the american people fed up wiht elitist liberal bullshit espoused by the media as gospel) get the last laugh. It's more satisfying than getting a bj while eating my favorite choc cake from my favorite steak house while watching my favorite sports team win a championship. It's on par with hitting a new PR in a deadlift to break another record and getting a bj in the bathroom afterward. Let the haters hate and winners gloat because that's what we were born to do. Trump was born to win and liberals were born to cry as sure as the sun rises in the east and sets in the west.
Click to expand...

When someone is so insecure their self-worth is base on what some rust belt rednecks who didn't do so hot in school think.
 
SP33Demon said:
You and the libs in this forum choking on your tears is already enough for me. Trump could pick Triple H and Vince McMahon for his cabinet and I'll still be laughing at y'all.
Click to expand...

So you'd be happy with a couple of wrestlers turned businessmen running the fundamental machinations of this country as long as you could get your rocks off.

You are a real winner.

Listen just cause you get off big time, chocolate cake and everything, to a bunch of sweaty guys in the ring, you should check out the Republican party's platform on gays. It's not so nice.

You'd be fucked if it wasn't for dem damn libruls fighting for your rights tooth and nail.
 
PixelSquish said:
So you'd be happy with a couple of wrestlers turned businessmen running the fundamental machinations of this country as long as you could get your rocks off.

You are a real winner.

Listen just cause you get off big time, chocolate cake and everything, to a bunch of sweaty guys in the ring, you should check out the Republican party's platform on gays. It's not so nice.

You'd be fucked if it wasn't for dem damn libruls fighting for your rights tooth and nail.
Click to expand...
You can't tell me Vince and his boys wouldn't do a good job.
vincetrump.gif
 
zinfamous said:
no, I don't want him to fail the country--I do want him to fail at the majority of his policies because they are clearly destructive (and expectedly, he's already walked back most of those promises...well, supposedly. Who knows what happens when he puts on his emperor clothes 😀)

The Pubs are the party of "our only goal from day one is to not allow Obama to do anything--no matter what." Maybe you should wait and see if that is how the dems act, huh? Before you start claiming this is somehow an identical situation.

I've still yet to see any real adult coming forth from this party of....deplorables. 😉
Click to expand...

You're raining on their gloating party you party pooper, you. 😉 I say let them gloat to their heart's content as the euphoria will eventually wear off as will the honeymoon, if one could call it that. I notice there is some really serious in-fighting going on between Trump's inner circle and the rest of the transition team. I can imagine there's some really vicious jockeying for positions on the down leg. The establishment types who know how the game is played are being rudely informed that the game has changed in a lot of ways, most of which work against those DC regulars in the crowd of whom Trump is seeking holy revenge on. These are folks who could actually smooth the way for Trump's transition, but they're the same ones who didn't want Trump to win in the first place.

With Trump leading himself and his inner circle of neophytes into the OJT phase of their brand spanking new government jobs, I can see a lot of decisions being made in the same spirit that Trump ran his campaign.

Trump ran on an anti-establishment platform, where he took sides with those working class conservatives AND a pile of turncoat liberals who saw Trump as their saving grace against those DC establishment GOP insiders who weren't listening to their pleas. Now Trump has to work with the establishment he so vilified and that right there is where some really interesting things are going to happen, real ugly style.

With all of that on Trump's plate, there's going to be mistakes made that will clearly expose Trump's inexperience with the job at hand, and woe to those who would point this out, for the wagons have already been circled around Trump and there's not much than can be said or done at the moment except to remind folks that Trump is still the same guy that we all came to know and love when his rants and raves and dubious exploits unfolded for all to be awe-struck from.
 
Last edited:
SP33Demon said:
Sure, your liberal cucked buddies at CNBC love them.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/03/11/tax-foundation-rates-tax-plans-who-comes-out-on-top.html
Click to expand...
From your link
Studies from both the Tax Foundation and another group, the Tax Policy Center, estimate that Trump's plan could cut tax revenues by more than $10 trillion dollars over the next 10 years, resulting in a large burgeoning of the national debt. Earlier this week, Trump responded by telling CNBC he could close that gap by cutting waste and fraud in government.
Click to expand...
Doesn't sound like love to me.
 
soundforbjt said:
From your link

Doesn't sound like love to me.
Click to expand...
Quite aware that revenue will be cut, after all, it was in their conclusion (from the updated plan, not the cnbc link which was his original plan in 2015). We'll post it here again for you and I even bolded the important parts for your viewing pleasure.
Conclusion
The Trump tax plan as outlined in September 2016 is a large tax cut, mostly on individual and corporate income. This plan would significantly reduce the cost of capital and reduce the marginal tax rate on labor. These changes in the incentives to work and invest would increase the U.S. economy’s size in the long run, boost wages, and result in more full-time equivalent jobs. On a static basis, the plan would reduce federal revenue by between $4.4 trillion and $5.9 trillion, depending on policy assumptions about business tax rates. However, due to the larger economy and the significantly broader tax base, the plan would reduce revenue by between $2.6 trillion and $3.9 trillion over the next decade, depending on those same policy assumptions. In all cases, it would increase after-tax incomes for all income groups, but reduce revenue to the Treasury.
Click to expand...
 
SP33Demon said:
Quite aware that revenue will be cut, after all, it was in their conclusion (from the updated plan, not the cnbc link which was his original plan in 2015). We'll post it here again for you and I even bolded the important parts for your viewing pleasure.
Click to expand...
I'm simply amazed they could know something before it's policy (your first bold)
Poor and middle class would get a small bone and the rich get the rest of the kill at the expense of a trillion a year deficit.(second bold)
Sounds peachy for the rich.
 
SP33Demon said:
You and the libs in this forum choking on your tears is already enough for me. Trump could pick Triple H and Vince McMahon for his cabinet and I'll still be laughing at y'all.
Click to expand...

He stares in mirror and screams "Face! I hate you so much I'm cutting of my nose! That'll teach you!"

Make sure you have lots of absorbent paper towels.
 
Uhh... lets be real.

This is what the taxfoundation said about the Trump tax plan effect :

":According to the Tax Foundation’s Taxes and Growth Model, the Trump tax plan would increase the long-run size of the economy by 6.9 percent under the higher-rate assumption, or 8.2 percent under the lower-rate assumption (Table 2). The larger economy would result in 5.4 percent higher wages and a 20.1 percent larger capital stock under the higher-rate assumption, or 6.3 percent higher wages and a 23.9 percent larger capital stock under the lower-rate assumption. The plan would also result in 1.8 million more full-time equivalent jobs under the higher-rate assumption, or 2.2 million more under the lower-rate assumption."


Or, you could be rooting to have this, the Hillary plan :

"According to the Tax Foundation’s Taxes and Growth Model, Secretary Clinton’s tax plan would reduce the economy’s size by 2.6 percent in the long run (Table 2). The slightly smaller economy would lead to 2.1 percent lower wages, a 6.9 percent smaller capital stock, and 697,000 fewer full-time equivalent jobs. The smaller economy results from somewhat higher marginal tax rates on capital and labor income."
 
Victorian Gray said:
He stares in mirror and screams "Face! I hate you so much I'm cutting of my nose! That'll teach you!"

Make sure you have lots of absorbent paper towels.
Click to expand...
In the end it won't matter since the people running this country in the obama admin have the political acumen of a Vince McMahon or worse. Trust me, people in my direct family work for the current admin and I get a lot of insider info. Which is exactly why I'm not a Demotard, I see and hear what my relatives see and fuck that. The only downside is that the last couple weeks have been tense but I haven't rubbed it in too much.
 
shady28 said:
Uhh... lets be real.

This is what the taxfoundation said about the Trump tax plan effect :

":According to the Tax Foundation’s Taxes and Growth Model, the Trump tax plan would increase the long-run size of the economy by 6.9 percent under the higher-rate assumption, or 8.2 percent under the lower-rate assumption (Table 2). The larger economy would result in 5.4 percent higher wages and a 20.1 percent larger capital stock under the higher-rate assumption, or 6.3 percent higher wages and a 23.9 percent larger capital stock under the lower-rate assumption. The plan would also result in 1.8 million more full-time equivalent jobs under the higher-rate assumption, or 2.2 million more under the lower-rate assumption."


Or, you could be rooting to have this, the Hillary plan :

"According to the Tax Foundation’s Taxes and Growth Model, Secretary Clinton’s tax plan would reduce the economy’s size by 2.6 percent in the long run (Table 2). The slightly smaller economy would lead to 2.1 percent lower wages, a 6.9 percent smaller capital stock, and 697,000 fewer full-time equivalent jobs. The smaller economy results from somewhat higher marginal tax rates on capital and labor income."
Click to expand...


even the bullshit right wing Taxfoundation admits the vast majority of tax cuts would be on the rich. The rest is pure theorizing that super trickle down economics will magically create jobs. And not just jobs, but only jobs in the US.

It's a fucking pipe dream and a bunch of horseshit. Yeah, 1.8 million domestic only jobs. I got a bridge, and I'll sell it to you.

And even then they have no clue about where the reductions will be made up in the deficit. But I mean who cares, this is Republican economics. Fuck the numbers. It's hopes and dreams. Give the super rich and corporations more money and they will inevitably invest all those dollars in hiring Americans to do shit. Instead of being more rich.

I'd believe a psychic fortune teller over those douchebags.
 
PixelSquish said:
even the bullshit right wing Taxfoundation admits the vast majority of tax cuts would be on the rich. The rest is pure theorizing that super trickle down economics will magically create jobs. And not just jobs, but only jobs in the US.

It's a fucking pipe dream and a bunch of horseshit. Yeah, 1.8 million domestic only jobs. I got a bridge, and I'll sell it to you.

And even then they have no clue about where the reductions will be made up in the deficit. But I mean who cares, this is Republican economics. Fuck the numbers. It's hopes and dreams. Give the super rich and corporations more money and they will inevitably invest all those dollars in hiring Americans to do shit. Instead of being more rich.

I'd believe a psychic fortune teller over those douchebags.
Click to expand...
They have their prediction and you have to respect that. If it doesn't work, then in with a berniebro in 2020. If (or more like After) they both fail, it will be interesting to see what happens next.
 
Don't forget the working class will get hit by higher interest rates and inflation to pay for the deficits that will pay for those tax cuts for the rich. But it's OK, because they voted for it.
 
SP33Demon said:
They have their prediction and you have to respect that. If it doesn't work, then in with a berniebro in 2020. If (or more like After) they both fail, it will be interesting to see what happens next.
Click to expand...

no I don't have to respect hocus pocus economics. That's your job as a TrumpBro.
 
shady28 said:
Uhh... lets be real.

This is what the taxfoundation said about the Trump tax plan effect :

":According to the Tax Foundation’s Taxes and Growth Model, the Trump tax plan would increase the long-run size of the economy by 6.9 percent under the higher-rate assumption, or 8.2 percent under the lower-rate assumption (Table 2). The larger economy would result in 5.4 percent higher wages and a 20.1 percent larger capital stock under the higher-rate assumption, or 6.3 percent higher wages and a 23.9 percent larger capital stock under the lower-rate assumption. The plan would also result in 1.8 million more full-time equivalent jobs under the higher-rate assumption, or 2.2 million more under the lower-rate assumption."


Or, you could be rooting to have this, the Hillary plan :

"According to the Tax Foundation’s Taxes and Growth Model, Secretary Clinton’s tax plan would reduce the economy’s size by 2.6 percent in the long run (Table 2). The slightly smaller economy would lead to 2.1 percent lower wages, a 6.9 percent smaller capital stock, and 697,000 fewer full-time equivalent jobs. The smaller economy results from somewhat higher marginal tax rates on capital and labor income."
Click to expand...

Do you think you make a convincing scholar of facts?
 
Atreus21 said:
Well yeah. The protests we're seeing seem to indicate that.
Click to expand...

So, Trump wasn't criticized for his deeds, beliefs and literal words, it was because he was a republican?

That's hilarious in the most pathetic way possible. Way to disprove the bubble-dwelling status guys.
 
SP33Demon said:
I mean, look at all the fucktards in this forum who claimed I was stupid, blah blah blah for supporting Trump and they all have egg on their faces.
Click to expand...

No, you are still stupid for supporting Trump. It is just that stupid won. That is not something to be proud of.
 
senseamp said:
Don't forget the working class will get hit by higher interest rates and inflation to pay for the deficits that will pay for those tax cuts for the rich. But it's OK, because they voted for it.
Click to expand...
You realize inflation is good for house values? A lot of the working class own homes and/or have a mortgage.
 
PixelSquish said:
no I don't have to respect hocus pocus economics. That's your job as a TrumpBro.
Click to expand...
Would love to see your solution to the jobs crisis as I've stated mine here many times regarding Earned Income Tax (EIT) credits (instead of min wage hikes since EITs partly pay for themselves) to get people off their asses who are sucking the teat, job retraining via STEM college subsidies for those who are capable, and incentives to bring in hot sector companies to states that need them to actually increase jobs there.

Oh wait, you have no solution.
 
I know people gloat M, and I understand why, but I see no constructive purpose in doing so. While I hope that people will learn to engage in introspection I do not see that happening. I see fear and fear mongering, some of the former understandable, but remember that the Phoenix is a wonderful creature who cannot be reborn if there were no ashes to rise from.

I hope that is what happens, rebirth in a better incarnation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top