It won't "hurt", but the benefits will not be apparent within the normal useful life of the car (under 300,000 miles). There's absolutely no reason to spend the extra money for a naturally-aspirated, liquid-cooled street car. None. Period.Originally posted by: Insane3D
While it may not be needed, that's not to say there aren't benefits to it, nor will it hurt anything.Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
This isn't true, and hasn't been true for at least a decade, probably two.Originally posted by: doze
Once you start using synthetic oil you pretty much have to keep on using it.
For a street-driven, naturally aspirated car that has its oil changed on the manufacturer's interval, there's no reason to use synthetic. Any regular oil will be fine and will not cause problems for the reasonable expected life of the vehicle (300,000 miles+).
Use the basic oil, change it as the manual recommends. Just make sure that you are using the correct weight and that you do not use FRAM filters.
ZV
My first car was an '88 Accord. My family (was my parents' car first) put 217,000 miles on it before I sold it. The entire life was using dino oil changed between 3,000 and 4,000 miles. When I did the last oil change before I sold it, the valvetrain was still shiny and silver and the car consumed no measureable amount of oil between oil changes.Originally posted by: OS
i've used synthetic since my car was broken in to 90K and when you look inside my oil cap, the valvetrain looks new, shiny, silver.
Look inside other cars using only dino and there's some varnish, if the car was not regularly maintained, it is quite brown inside even with about half the mileage.
word on the street now is mobil 1 has gone "fake" synthetic like syntec (no GC), etc. all the other retail brands.
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
There's absolutely no reason to spend the extra money for a naturally-aspirated, liquid-cooled street car. None. Period.
ZV
Originally posted by: Insane3D
Gotcha...
Well, since my interval will be so short, I'm thinking it's a safe bet that any decent synthetic will be fine. I just got back from Advance with two cases (12 bottles) of the Penzoil Platinum for ~$34...not bad..not bad at all. When I told the guy that was just enough for two oil changes he was like..what kind of car do you have.
![]()
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
My first car was an '88 Accord. My family (was my parents' car first) put 217,000 miles on it before I sold it. The entire life was using dino oil changed between 3,000 and 4,000 miles. When I did the last oil change before I sold it, the valvetrain was still shiny and silver and the car consumed no measureable amount of oil between oil changes.Originally posted by: OS
i've used synthetic since my car was broken in to 90K and when you look inside my oil cap, the valvetrain looks new, shiny, silver.
Look inside other cars using only dino and there's some varnish, if the car was not regularly maintained, it is quite brown inside even with about half the mileage.
word on the street now is mobil 1 has gone "fake" synthetic like syntec (no GC), etc. all the other retail brands.
Any car that's taken care of will be fine on dino oil for any reasonable expectation of its useful life.
ZV
Cold temps are actually harder on dino oil unless you get above the 100s. Ohio saw 10s-20s in the winter and 85-95 in the summer. It's not like it was a nice, constant 50 degrees where engines are really happy.Originally posted by: OS
Possibly because you live in a colder part of the countryOriginally posted by: Zenmervolt
My first car was an '88 Accord. My family (was my parents' car first) put 217,000 miles on it before I sold it. The entire life was using dino oil changed between 3,000 and 4,000 miles. When I did the last oil change before I sold it, the valvetrain was still shiny and silver and the car consumed no measureable amount of oil between oil changes.Originally posted by: OS
i've used synthetic since my car was broken in to 90K and when you look inside my oil cap, the valvetrain looks new, shiny, silver.
Look inside other cars using only dino and there's some varnish, if the car was not regularly maintained, it is quite brown inside even with about half the mileage.
word on the street now is mobil 1 has gone "fake" synthetic like syntec (no GC), etc. all the other retail brands.
Any car that's taken care of will be fine on dino oil for any reasonable expectation of its useful life.
ZV
By the time you add in the cost of the oil analysis (not to mention the inconvenience), you're back at square one. This isn't a case where you'll save money in the long term by using synthetic. Synthetic would need to more than double the change interval to even break even. And that's neglecting the fact that even with an extended oil change interval, you still need to change the filter at the normal interval.Originally posted by: Insane3D
How about extended oil change intervals?Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
There's absolutely no reason to spend the extra money for a naturally-aspirated, liquid-cooled street car. None. Period.
ZV
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Cold temps are actually harder on dino oil unless you get above the 100s. Ohio saw 10s-20s in the winter and 85-95 in the summer. It's not like it was a nice, constant 50 degrees where engines are really happy.Originally posted by: OS
Possibly because you live in a colder part of the countryOriginally posted by: Zenmervolt
My first car was an '88 Accord. My family (was my parents' car first) put 217,000 miles on it before I sold it. The entire life was using dino oil changed between 3,000 and 4,000 miles. When I did the last oil change before I sold it, the valvetrain was still shiny and silver and the car consumed no measureable amount of oil between oil changes.Originally posted by: OS
i've used synthetic since my car was broken in to 90K and when you look inside my oil cap, the valvetrain looks new, shiny, silver.
Look inside other cars using only dino and there's some varnish, if the car was not regularly maintained, it is quite brown inside even with about half the mileage.
word on the street now is mobil 1 has gone "fake" synthetic like syntec (no GC), etc. all the other retail brands.
Any car that's taken care of will be fine on dino oil for any reasonable expectation of its useful life.
ZV
I'm not arguing that synthetics aren't "better", just that the "better-ness" doesn't come into play within the normal operating parameters of a street car.
ZV
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
By the time you add in the cost of the oil analysis (not to mention the inconvenience), you're back at square one. This isn't a case where you'll save money in the long term by using synthetic. Synthetic would need to more than double the change interval to even break even. And that's neglecting the fact that even with an extended oil change interval, you still need to change the filter at the normal interval.
ZV
Originally posted by: Insane3D
Well, I respect your opinion, but I also think you are stating your personal feelings about synthetic as fact. To simply say synthetic has no benefit is simply false IMO.
There are so many variables involved....
As for your feelings on a extended change interval, IMO...it's still a benefit whether you think it's worth it or not.
![]()
Originally posted by: OS
what maybe of interest to you is honda basically requires use of synthetic oil for the RDX turbo motor. I recall the main reason was for deposit control.
The spec they had was HTO-06 and initially only M1 met the requirement, but I believe PP will soon be on the approved list.
http://www.mobiloil.com/USA-English/Mot...l/Files/Acura_RDX_Mobil_1_Brochure.pdf
Originally posted by: Insane3D
Originally posted by: OS
what maybe of interest to you is honda basically requires use of synthetic oil for the RDX turbo motor. I recall the main reason was for deposit control.
The spec they had was HTO-06 and initially only M1 met the requirement, but I believe PP will soon be on the approved list.
http://www.mobiloil.com/USA-English/Mot...l/Files/Acura_RDX_Mobil_1_Brochure.pdf
Oh, I agree, and I think ZV specifically said it was a waste on NA cars...
I think on a FI car he would agree synthetic is not a bad idea...but I can't speak for him.
Originally posted by: shortspanishguy
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
do not use FRAM filters.
I second this.
Originally posted by: OS
I wasn't using that to make a jab at anyone, just that the RDX engine is similar to the Mazda 2.3L turbo, both turbo medium size 4 cylinder.
Originally posted by: giantpinkbunnyhead
Originally posted by: mrSHEiK124
Originally posted by: Insane3D
The MS6 comes with a syn blend from the factory. I'm having the dealership do the first change @ 1k miles to get all those break in metals out of there, then @ 3k I'm switching to Mobil 1 5w-30 and doing them myself. The interval in the manual is 5k miles because I meet some of the harsh driving conditions...short drives and I live in an environment where salt is in use. I'll probably just change it every 2500-3500 miles since it's a turbo car, and the peace of mind is cheap IMO. It's like $25 for 6 quarts of Mobil 1, and another $6 for a Mazda cartridge filter...
I keep my cars for 10-15 years, so it's worth it to me...
I'm probably going to be keeping my Altima for a while too, so I'm trying to do the most I can to extend its lifespan. If I want to avoid FRAM filters like the plague, are there any safe brands of filters to choose or safe places to find them?
Yes. use the OEM Nissan filters.
Originally posted by: M2008S
whats wrong with fram filters?
i use acdelco or regular crap anyways. not worth the money in a 92 chevy V6 pickemup with 233k
