-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
OH NO HE DIDZN'T!!!1
Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Oh, I get it Rainsford, I'm a troll if I don't have the exact same viewpoint and perspective as you do.
I'm stupid because I want to know exactly what Obama wants to change but wont tell us because he is so much smarter than us all that we don't need to be bothered with these tiny "change" details.
I can see why they made you a mod here. You tow the democratic/liberal line. Hope that works out for you beyond this messageboard. 😉
Honest commentary? You made wild accusations with no proof to back them up and were proven wrong. In response you made more wild accusations with no proof.
Obama isn't perfect and the only ones who make that statement are trolls like you trying to pin it on him. Your sig pretty much says it all. I should use one of your lines as a quote for my own sig. Of course, I'll spice it up a bit and take it out of context. How's this sound? "I'm stupid" -- Conky 8/24/08
BMW540I6speed
Golden Member
McCain's reaction to the blowback on his confusion is a counter to the counterpunch, and of course resorts - as these things always do - to innuendo. Not a shred of evidence has been introduced to show any quid-pro-quo or anthing else improper. In fact, all of the evidence to date suggests that the entire transaction was completely on the up-and-up, with only the fact that it was a guy already suspected of being shady being an issue. Prove otherwise.
I think we are right to assume that if Paddy Fitz couldn't find anything substantive and crooked linking Obama and Rezko, it isn't there. Fitz has shown no reluctance to go after big fish.
Now, if McCain wants to make this about "judgment" in selecting people with whom one associates, I think Obama should welcome that, as McCain's list of cringe-worthy cronies is long and well documented, starting of course with one Charles Keating.
I think McCain brings it into play himself everytime he tries to make insinuations about Obama and Rezko. Obama has never had to be "cleared" of anything or warned about poor judgement. If McCain wants to play this "associations" game with Obama, Obama should bring up not only the Keating 5, but dig around for every scummy lobbyist and sleazeball political connection John McCain has ever rubbed dicks with. Obama should also prominently display that picture of McCain with his face lovingly nestled in the bosom of of GW Bush.
As long as we are at this "sleazy" level of discourse, lets level the playing field..
The McCain camp can keep trying to tie Obama's home purchase to his association with Rezko as long as they're prepared to deal with the fact that Cindy McCain's father, James Hensley, was a convicted felon. But more importantly, his wealth came from his Budweiser distributorship which he received as a result from his relationship with Kemper Marley.
So, for those who want to reach beyond what has reported to be the truth on Obama's home purchase, I'm entirely comfortable with tying McCain to seven houses purchased with money made through an association with a true slimeball.
At least Rezko didn't blow-up the reporters investigating him.
I think we are right to assume that if Paddy Fitz couldn't find anything substantive and crooked linking Obama and Rezko, it isn't there. Fitz has shown no reluctance to go after big fish.
Now, if McCain wants to make this about "judgment" in selecting people with whom one associates, I think Obama should welcome that, as McCain's list of cringe-worthy cronies is long and well documented, starting of course with one Charles Keating.
I think McCain brings it into play himself everytime he tries to make insinuations about Obama and Rezko. Obama has never had to be "cleared" of anything or warned about poor judgement. If McCain wants to play this "associations" game with Obama, Obama should bring up not only the Keating 5, but dig around for every scummy lobbyist and sleazeball political connection John McCain has ever rubbed dicks with. Obama should also prominently display that picture of McCain with his face lovingly nestled in the bosom of of GW Bush.
As long as we are at this "sleazy" level of discourse, lets level the playing field..
The McCain camp can keep trying to tie Obama's home purchase to his association with Rezko as long as they're prepared to deal with the fact that Cindy McCain's father, James Hensley, was a convicted felon. But more importantly, his wealth came from his Budweiser distributorship which he received as a result from his relationship with Kemper Marley.
So, for those who want to reach beyond what has reported to be the truth on Obama's home purchase, I'm entirely comfortable with tying McCain to seven houses purchased with money made through an association with a true slimeball.
At least Rezko didn't blow-up the reporters investigating him.
Google isn't a source, Conky- it's just a search engine, a way to find sources. It's not authoritative in any way.
And simply labelling an acknowledged reputable source such as Factcheck "Liberal" or "Libtard" merely reinforces the opinion that your own opinion is deeply flawed and deliberately ignorant.
The Obamas apparently paid the Rezkos $105K for a 10ft strip of property adjacent to their own which was appraised at $40K. Nobody else would have paid that much, but it had more value to the Obamas than its appraised value. It's now part of their yard, where their kids play...
Seems to me that you're much more intent on finding fault than finding out the truth, probably about anything... basically, that you're intellectually snakebit by emotionally charged rightwing ideological claptrap.
And simply labelling an acknowledged reputable source such as Factcheck "Liberal" or "Libtard" merely reinforces the opinion that your own opinion is deeply flawed and deliberately ignorant.
The Obamas apparently paid the Rezkos $105K for a 10ft strip of property adjacent to their own which was appraised at $40K. Nobody else would have paid that much, but it had more value to the Obamas than its appraised value. It's now part of their yard, where their kids play...
Seems to me that you're much more intent on finding fault than finding out the truth, probably about anything... basically, that you're intellectually snakebit by emotionally charged rightwing ideological claptrap.
cKGunslinger
Lifer
That's right, Rains. The only way to *not* be a liberal fanboy is if you completely agree with every biased, partisan hack-piece Conky posts here. That's how you know you're an honest, self-reliant, independently-minded truth-seeker!
Yee-haw!
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 25K
-
-
-
