PricklyPete
Lifer
- Sep 17, 2002
- 14,582
- 162
- 106
Originally posted by: Aikouka
Here's an article from CNN pretty much saying how DLC makes games more expensive:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/fun.games/05/24/xbox.360.price.reut/index.html
I think it tries to push that DLC becomes almost forced if the user still wants to play the game. I think that's an understandable opinion as the same occurs with people that play games with expansion packs. Imagine a person that wants to play WoW without the BC expansion. Yeah, he won't find too many people to play with when he's stuck at 60, but at least there are plenty of other maps to find other than Epic's 4 new maps.
What really needs to be looked at is if DLC wasn't available, would these extras be shipping with the game for no extra cost? If not, then this could be a good thing as those maps may either never see the light of day, be available in the sequel or available in some special "Gold Edition." For games like DDR Universe, I can see how people would be annoyed as the songs you're paying $10 for are already on the disc. You're literally paying to download a 100kb file to unlock the extra songs.
DLC has its ups and downs just like most things. I'm not complaining as I vote with my check book. If I think some DLC is a complete rip-off, I refuse to buy it. Or in the case of GoW and Epic...when MS is forcing the developer to charge...I refuse (I'll download it when it is free). On the other hand, when good DLC comes out (like GRAW and R6:V content) comes out...I readily purchase it as I love those games and this is certainly new content above and beyond what I expected for my original $60.