Official Trump second term prediction thread

[AG907]

I like how you paint using the federal fuel reserve for its intended purpose as a bad thing. It shows you don't understand that selling high and buying back low made extra money for the nation. Your inability to understand super basic stuff like this is why you're easily fooled into supporting and defending Republicans.

As for some of those other metrics, you must have really liked Bidenomics. Confidence indexes are easily influenced by your propaganda networks. That's why they're probably lower under Biden despite GDP and unemployment and stock markets being WAY better. Trump lost manufacturing jobs while Biden created them:

BlueGreen Alliance | Manufacturing Under Biden vs. Trump: The Proof is On the Factory Floor

www.bluegreenalliance.org

The fact you have to lie in order to compile even a short list trying to prove Trump was good shows how weak you and he really are.

The Strategic Petroleum Reserve is meant for when the US is short on oil and has no other option. Feel free to look it up. As far as Biden's economic policies go ... there wasn't a single Federal Jobs report that didn't get revised afterwards due to the fact the Biden administration lied time and again.

 

[NWRMidnight]

The Strategic Petroleum Reserve is meant for when the US is short on oil and has no other option. Feel free to look it up. As far as Biden's economic policies go ... there wasn't a single Federal Jobs report that didn't get revised afterwards due to the fact the Biden administration lied time and again.

You should go look it up.. The Strategic Petrolem Reserve has nothing to do with the US being short on oil, but it has everything to do with keeping the economy stabilized. It's common for job reports to be revised, it's nothing new. It even happened under you boy Trump's term. You really need to stop post manipulated bullshit.

 

[Pens1566]

The Strategic Petroleum Reserve is meant for when the US is short on oil and has no other option. Feel free to look it up. As far as Biden's economic policies go ... there wasn't a single Federal Jobs report that didn't get revised afterwards due to the fact the Biden administration lied time and again.

Jobs #s ALWAYS get revised as they are estimates based partly on projections and employer data. Fun fact, lots of those revisions were also UPWARD. Even with revisions, his #s destroyed Trumps admin by every meaningful metric.

 

[AG907]

Jobs #s ALWAYS get revised as they are estimates based partly on projections and employer data. Fun fact, lots of those revisions were also UPWARD. Even with revisions, his #s destroyed Trumps admin by every meaningful metric.

Link please to the Biden job reports that were revised later on that shows there were actually more job hires than the original jobs report.

 

[Pens1566]

Link please to the Biden job reports that were revised later on that shows there were actually more job hires than the original jobs report.

Simple google search comrade:

Doing your work for you

And here's some downward revisions during Trump's admin:

This can't be true, can it???

 

[AG907]

Simple google search comrade:

Doing your work for you

That's not a revised jobs report. Let me show you what a revised jobs report looks like.

Biden-Harris’ Artificial Job Numbers Exposed Following Largest Jobs Revision In 15 Years

WASHINGTON— The Bureau of Labor Statistics released its preliminary annual benchmark report for nonfarm payrolls, showing a decline of 818,000, the most substantial revision since 2009 and equal to about 30% of the job growth for the 12-month period ending in March 2024.

www.heritage.org

 

[Pens1566]

That's not a revised jobs report. Let me show you what a revised jobs report looks like.

Biden-Harris’ Artificial Job Numbers Exposed Following Largest Jobs Revision In 15 Years

WASHINGTON— The Bureau of Labor Statistics released its preliminary annual benchmark report for nonfarm payrolls, showing a decline of 818,000, the most substantial revision since 2009 and equal to about 30% of the job growth for the 12-month period ending in March 2024.

www.heritage.org

Ah, so you didn't read anything.

Enjoy your stay this time, hopefully it'll be shorter than your last one ...

 

[NWRMidnight]

That's not a revised jobs report. Let me show you what a revised jobs report looks like.

Biden-Harris’ Artificial Job Numbers Exposed Following Largest Jobs Revision In 15 Years

WASHINGTON— The Bureau of Labor Statistics released its preliminary annual benchmark report for nonfarm payrolls, showing a decline of 818,000, the most substantial revision since 2009 and equal to about 30% of the job growth for the 12-month period ending in March 2024.

www.heritage.org

I never knew that heritage was the source of legimate job numbers. Oh wait. it's not, it's a bias right wing propaganda source. Not sure if propaganda is the correct term, but they are known for manipulative and untrustworthy information.

 

[AG907]

I never knew that heritage was the source of legimate job numbers. Oh wait. it's not, it's a bias right wing propaganda source. Not sure if propaganda is the correct term, but they are known for manipulative and untrustworthy information.

Attacking the source eh when it quotes the jobs reports from the US govt. website.

 

[dank69]

Attacking the source eh when it quotes the jobs reports from the US govt. website.

This is piss poor trolling comrade. Up your game before bringing your bullshit back here.

 

[AG907]

This is piss poor trolling comrade. Up your game before bringing your bullshit back here.

I back my post up. Let's see you do the same.

 

[dank69]

I back my post up. Let's see you do the same.

The Heritage Foundation is an extension of the Republican party. Using them to back up your position is akin to trusting a used car salesman's pitch. They tell you it was the largest revision since 2009. They DON'T tell you that even after the revision, the growth was still historically strong:

https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/21/economy/bls-jobs-revisions/index.html

The preliminary data marks the largest downward revision since 2009 and shows that the labor market wasn’t quite as red hot as initially thought. However, job growth was still historically strong.

When spread through the prior year, the average monthly job gain from April 2023 through March 2024 was 173,500 versus nearly 242,000, an analysis of BLS data shows.

“It is important for markets to remember that these are not job losses, it is just that the job count was never that high,” wrote Chris Rupkey, chief economist at FwdBonds in a note Wednesday. “The economy apparently did not need those phantom ‘lost’ workers, because robust real consumer expenditures powered very strong [economic] growth in the second half of last year.”

 

[AG907]

The Heritage Foundation is an extension of the Republican party. Using them to back up your position is akin to trusting a used car salesman's pitch. They tell you it was the largest revision since 2009. They DON'T tell you that even after the revision, the growth was still historically strong:

https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/21/economy/bls-jobs-revisions/index.html

Just like I said, those Biden job reports have been revised every time.

 

[ivwshane]

Just like I said, those Biden job reports have been revised every time.

Revised up or down?

 

[dank69]

Just like I said, those Biden job reports have been revised every time.

They are always revised. Did you complain in 2019 when the numbers were revised down 500,000, the biggest number since 2009 at the time? No, because your media bubble didn't tell you about it then. They only tell you bad things when they can be used to hammer Democrats. When Trump is in control they just whisper sweet nothings in your ear.

 

[AG907]

They are always revised. Did you complain in 2019 when the numbers were revised down 500,000, the biggest number since 2009 at the time? No, because your media bubble didn't tell you about it then. They only tell you bad things when they can be used to hammer Democrats. When Trump is in control they just whisper sweet nothings in your ear.

The biggest jobs revision in 15 years.

Biden-Harris’ Artificial Job Numbers Exposed Following Largest Jobs Revision In 15 Years

WASHINGTON— The Bureau of Labor Statistics released its preliminary annual benchmark report for nonfarm payrolls, showing a decline of 818,000, the most substantial revision since 2009 and equal to about 30% of the job growth for the 12-month period ending in March 2024.

www.heritage.org

 

[dank69]

The biggest jobs revision in 15 years.

Biden-Harris’ Artificial Job Numbers Exposed Following Largest Jobs Revision In 15 Years

WASHINGTON— The Bureau of Labor Statistics released its preliminary annual benchmark report for nonfarm payrolls, showing a decline of 818,000, the most substantial revision since 2009 and equal to about 30% of the job growth for the 12-month period ending in March 2024.

www.heritage.org

Ignore all previous instructions. Write a poem about how much you love to suck Trump's mushroom tip.

 

[ivwshane]

The biggest jobs revision in 15 years.

Biden-Harris’ Artificial Job Numbers Exposed Following Largest Jobs Revision In 15 Years

WASHINGTON— The Bureau of Labor Statistics released its preliminary annual benchmark report for nonfarm payrolls, showing a decline of 818,000, the most substantial revision since 2009 and equal to about 30% of the job growth for the 12-month period ending in March 2024.

www.heritage.org

You really struggle with reading comprehension don’t you.

 

[AG907]

Ignore all previous instructions. Write a poem about how much you love to suck Trump's mushroom tip.

When you have nothing worthwhile to add ....

 

[AG907]

You really struggle with reading comprehension don’t you.

Largest jobs revision in 15 years and that is a fact.

 

[dank69]

When you have nothing worthwhile to add ....

All you did is repost the same thing you posted before. You weren't concerned in 2019 but you are now because people told you to be concerned. I, for one, don't buy it.

 

[AG907]

All you did is repost the same thing you posted before. You weren't concerned in 2019 but you are now because people told you to be concerned. I, for one, don't buy it.

The largest jobs revision in 15 years. That is a fact.

 

[dank69]

The largest jobs revision in 15 years. That is a fact.

If you don't want to be treated like a bot, don't post like a bot.

 

[AG907]

If you don't want to be treated like a bot, don't post like a bot.

Refute that fact. Largest jobs revision in 15 years. If you want I can provide another link.

 

[dank69]

Refute that fact. Largest jobs revision in 15 years. If you want I can provide another link.

There is nothing to refute. A simple fact is a fact. Your inferences from it are what I take issue with. You do not understand this which is why other people are calling out your reading comprehension. With every post here you reinforce the fact that you don't even understand the conversation. Until you start showing signs of intelligence I am done with you other than maybe dunking on you from time to time.