Muse
Lifer
- Jul 11, 2001
- 40,867
- 10,221
- 136
I don't get where Trump calls the acquisition of Greenland a necessity for security reasons. I haven't seen or heard any unravelling of his thinking on this, if there is any. It's just something he says in lieu of an explanation for his obsession as far as I can see. What is it? Resources? A feather in his hat? We can't need missile launch sites there, we have nuclear attack submarines and ICBMs. Does he want acquisitions to leave some argument that he augmented the USA in some tangible way? There's nothing else, really. No new health care system, no wall, no infrastructure, just a legacy of chaos, violence, a million+ dead from his horrible pandemic response, a bunch of conservative judges, destruction of Roe, a shambles of a reputation, denigration of all he considers his enemies. I think it's at least partly a smoke screen for his priorities, being establishing a financial empire for himself and his family and distracting from the task at hand, getting his horrible cabinet picks approved.People don't talk about it a lot, but Bill Gates palled around with Jeffrey Epstein. And you know the cliche about the "company that you keep."
Trump has had a woody for Greenland since his first term. The U.S. isn't going to attack a NATO ally unless the military chain-of-command resigns en masse. Trump thinks so highly of himself that he believes he can buy Greenland just like we bought Alaska from the Russian empire.
I'm not sure that I buy we're directly attacking the Mexican cartels soon after inauguration, but I do buy that an unhinged Trump is a dangerous mofo.
Yeah.The Greenland thing smacks as some kind of sad desperation to be able to attach his name to some kind of "accomplishment" to be remembered for. Trump would claim he made a bigger deal than Jefferson did for the Louisiana purchase.
Last edited: