As per TPU's 10900K review, OCing that chip brings no difference in gaming, so stock is basically the same. Similar can be seen with Ryzen, so out of the box performance in games is basically the best. What can make a great difference is IF clock speed and memory clock, I'm looking forward to some deep dive gaming tests with high IF/mem clock pushed to the limit.
Actually that s 11% in MT and 15% for ST, wich mean that they ate in the max throughput to improve ST, thus leaving less unused ressource for a second thread.AMD included several games in their IPC test to get to the 19% increase. Not saying that's invalid, it's perfectly valid, but computerbase measured ~15% IPC increase in multi-threaded non-gaming loads. AMD had a pretty big increase in "gaming IPC" with this gen which has now given AMD the lead in pretty much every category. Interesting how this CPU turned out.
Yup. Not quite the "utter destruction" some were predicting. I'd love to see overclocked + 4000MHZ RAM OC results as well. I suppose this means Rocket Lake S is going to dominate in gaming, no question?Gaming seems to be a wash, with a slight lead to the 5950X over the 10900K
Igor already did test 4000 Mhz. In some games the difference is staggering
I will believe Those gaming numbers when I test the chip myself in gaming critical situation with tuned system. I already made a mistake by buying 3900x as gaming chip, tested in running alone on the grass field....
TPU always get the lowest binned Ryzens and Radeons...
I'm here, I nailed my prognosis 99% .
Thanks! But it seems the chips themselves are not overclocked?Igor already did test 4000 Mhz. In some games the difference is staggering
while in some not so much:
At least now there are more than one or two valve games where even 3600X is faster than 10900K. MIcrosoft Flight Simulator, Hitman, World War Z ... plenty of others. Where AMD is slower, it only by a hair.
As for Rocket Lake "dominating", I believe when I see it. Gaming performance seems to be a fickle thing not really helped much by IPC but really dependent on memory latency and such. It will probably be faster, but surely not in games AMD dominates.
2933 Mhz testing in 720p test, I guess? Did you include gaming tests in your ipc calculation as well, ala AMD? The Cove cores will do better on desktop, ipc-wise. Hold your horses, dude.I'm here, I nailed my prognosis 99% .
It is even worse for intel, there is no reason to recommend any intel SKU any more. Funnily enough, 720p gaming AMD's lead extends due to a massive 26-27% IPC lead. Oh and AT confiirmed AMD has ~7% lead over best Coves in Spec 2017/2006.
How are you, not in ruins yet?
I have just proven I nailed my whole chip performance projection to a ~99% precision and this is all you have to say?2933 Mhz testing in 720p test, I guess? Did you include gaming tests in your ipc calculation as well, ala AMD? The Cove cores will do better on desktop, ipc-wise. Hold your horses, dude.
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|Question How does the memory divider usually work at ryzen 5000?||CPUs and Overclocking||1|
|H||Question -||CPUs and Overclocking||2|
|G||Question Will the $175 I5 11400f give the $200 Ryzen 5 3600 a run for the money?||CPUs and Overclocking||16|
|Question Which is better? Ryzen 5800x vs 3900||CPUs and Overclocking||24|
|Question Ryzen 7 3700X - CPU throttled?||CPUs and Overclocking||52|