Official....Review of Fahrenheit 9/11

Page 13 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

TheWart

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 2000
5,219
1
76
Well, if you think Bush (as Gov. of Texas) "invited" the Taliban reps to Texas re: oil is an example as one of Moore's "facts", then I don't want to wake up.
 

andrewjm

Senior member
Jun 7, 2002
421
0
0
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
..... Oh, and Moore did recognize the fact that there is a congressman son that is currently serving in the military.
.....

That is not true...

-----------------------------------------------------------------
A transcript released by the film's producers shows Moore telling Kennedy that "there is only one member [of Congress] who has a kid over there in Iraq." He asks Kennedy to help him pass out literature encouraging others "to get their kids to enlist in the Army and go over to Iraq."

Kennedy replies, "I'd be happy to. Especially those who voted for the war. [As Kennedy did.] I have a nephew on his way to Afghanistan."

To which Moore replies: "I appreciate it."
-----------------------------------------------------------------


a nephew is not a son, and is not answering moore's question. he has all right to edit out his response because he did not answer the question. if i ask that question, and your reponse is "i like pasta" it is not related to the question, and should be edited out. moore did not ask if he had a nephew, he asked if he had a son enlisted. he does have a son, just not enlisted, which is the point moore was trying to make.
 

Aharami

Lifer
Aug 31, 2001
21,205
165
106
Originally posted by: Cheeseburger
Originally posted by: Francodman
Saw it and it got a standing O in my movie theater...eh it was entertaining and somewhat powerful


I bet Hitler's movies had the same effect on Germans.

Originally posted by: Cheeseburger

Much like Hitler in WWII I bet...

do you like Hitler or something?! stop being so ignorant enough to make that kind of a blanket statement
 
Jun 4, 2004
162
0
0
Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: Cheeseburger
Originally posted by: Francodman
Saw it and it got a standing O in my movie theater...eh it was entertaining and somewhat powerful


I bet Hitler's movies had the same effect on Germans.

Originally posted by: Cheeseburger

Much like Hitler in WWII I bet...

do you like Hitler or something?! stop being so ignorant enough to make that kind of a blanket statement



How is using history being ignorant? Hitler used propaganda to have the people love him and to this day many Germans still think he was the greatest thing to happen to their country.

Now we have the reverse thing being done to Bush. This film is making people think he is the worst thing to happen to this country.
 

gururu

Platinum Member
Jul 16, 2002
2,402
0
0
Originally posted by: andrewjm
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
..... Oh, and Moore did recognize the fact that there is a congressman son that is currently serving in the military.
.....

That is not true...

-----------------------------------------------------------------
A transcript released by the film's producers shows Moore telling Kennedy that "there is only one member [of Congress] who has a kid over there in Iraq." He asks Kennedy to help him pass out literature encouraging others "to get their kids to enlist in the Army and go over to Iraq."

Kennedy replies, "I'd be happy to. Especially those who voted for the war. [As Kennedy did.] I have a nephew on his way to Afghanistan."

To which Moore replies: "I appreciate it."
-----------------------------------------------------------------


a nephew is not a son, and is not answering moore's question. he has all right to edit out his response because he did not answer the question. if i ask that question, and your reponse is "i like pasta" it is not related to the question, and should be edited out. moore did not ask if he had a nephew, he asked if he had a son enlisted. he does have a son, just not enlisted, which is the point moore was trying to make.

Kennedy is not the member of congress Moore is referring to...

Tim Johnson
 

Shelly21

Diamond Member
May 28, 2002
4,111
1
0
Originally posted by: Cheeseburger
Originally posted by: Aharami
Originally posted by: Cheeseburger
Originally posted by: Francodman
Saw it and it got a standing O in my movie theater...eh it was entertaining and somewhat powerful


I bet Hitler's movies had the same effect on Germans.

Originally posted by: Cheeseburger

Much like Hitler in WWII I bet...

do you like Hitler or something?! stop being so ignorant enough to make that kind of a blanket statement



How is using history being ignorant? Hitler used propaganda to have the people love him and to this day many Germans still think he was the greatest thing to happen to their country.

Now we have the reverse thing being done to Bush. This film is making people think he is the worst thing to happen to this country.

What's wrong with propaganda fool?

We drop good propaganda in Iraq for people to love us and to this day some Iraqs still think that we are the best thing to happen to their country.
 

sillymofo

Banned
Aug 11, 2003
5,817
2
0
Fact: Unical did funded a $2 billion pipeline project through Afghanistan, but did pull out (or denied) because of "political instability). After all the country only has a natural gas reserve of 5 trillion cubic feet, and it would make a good path for a pipeline to the sea. Construction didn't resume until after the Taliban was no longer in power.

Fact: The Taliban government did not have anything to do with 9/11 or killed any US citizen, nor did they declared war on US.

Fact: Saudis and the Bin Laden Group do have a lot of freaking money invested in the US economy, now if they diversify their investment, and "coincidentally" invested in the companies that are benefiting from the so called war, you decide.

Fact: They (the Bin Ladens) did leave the country on airplanes immediately after 9/11.

Fact: Bush did run all of the companies that he presided of over to the ground, including the one he's running.

Fact: Iraq has nothing to do with 9/11, or terrorists, or WMD, or has ever declared war, or bombed the US.

Fact: Bush violated one of the biggest rule of engagement, that is trying to assassinate a state leader of a sovereign country before declaring war.

Fact: Iraq is the second largest oil deposit on earth.

Fact: Soldiers are dying every day in Iraq, and yeah, the Iraqis "love" us.

Fact: Oh, and all the people that were working for certain connected companies, and organizations that are benefiting from the war, were, or are still working for those companies. The movie just show you how they are connected, now, if you want to connect the dot, you can, or you can just sit there and scream conspiracy theorists.

Yeah, we sit here and say that they (the Iraqis) deserve it, but let's reverse the situation. Some people would storm in your house in the middle of the night and treat you like criminals, even though you've done nothing wrong, and all in the name of "bringing peace to your country". How much would you have liked the "helpers" then?

Do you hate terrorists? You do right? After all, they did kill >3000 innocent Americans. Now, is that hatred enough for you to want to cut off the heads of any citizen of national origins from which these terrorists are spawned? Is that hatred enough for you to string their bodies (we're talking just innocent people from the same country), mutilated, burnt, and still beating on them? You gotta stop and think why. We sit here with our TVs, watching our "credible" new sources, googling for information and we think we know every thing on earth. Ignorance is what spawned that hatred my friend.
 

TheWart

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 2000
5,219
1
76
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Fact: Unical did funded a $2 billion pipeline project through Afghanistan, but did pull out (or denied) because of "political instability). After all the country only has a natural gas reserve of 5 trillion cubic feet, and it would make a good path for a pipeline to the sea. Construction didn't resume until after the Taliban was no longer in power.

Sure.....point is?
Fact: The Taliban government did not have anything to do with 9/11 or killed any US citizen, nor did they declared war on US.

Uhh, except for the fact that they sheltered and help run/administer the AQ training camps where the hijackers not to mention thousands of other terrorists trained. The US even offered a way for them to save face by extraditing OBL after 9-11.....more than fair imo.

Fact: Saudis and the Bin Laden Group do have a lot of freaking money invested in the US economy, now if they diversify their investment, and "coincidentally" invested in the companies that are benefiting from the so called war, you decide.

I don't understand what the second part of your statement is saying. Is it saying that they could invest defense companies and make money, or that they already have. Please, defense companies are being invested in by tons of people.

Fact: They (the Bin Ladens) did leave the country on airplanes immediately after 9/11.

Umm, ok. They did, but they were properly screened/interviewed as the head of the 9-11 commission (a democrat) even said. These are the people who have denounced OBL many years ago too.

Fact: Bush did run all of the companies that he presided of over to the ground, including the one he's running.

Not sure what you are trying to say.....

Fact: Iraq has nothing to do with 9/11, or terrorists, or WMD, or has ever declared war, or bombed the US.

Well, this is still up in the air. It does seem that the Clinton (remember, they said the *same things* as Biush admin has said) oversetimated the WMD capability of Iraq. However, AQ agents *have* met with Iraqi agents, and Russia recently said Iraq was preparing to perpetrate acts of terrorism inside the US (whether with/without AQ I don't know).

Fact: Bush violated one of the biggest rule of engagement, that is trying to assassinate a state leader of a sovereign country before declaring war.

Uhh, are you kidding me? He declared war while simultaneously launching surgical strikes in order to topple the resistance prematurely so that the war may be over quicker.

Fact: Iraq is the second largest oil deposit on earth.

And the US would have had a *lot* easier of a time controlling those through big oil companies by lifting sanctions than by going to war. The press/public couldhave been kept in the dark.......So please, drop the 'oil for blood slogan.'

Fact: Soldiers are dying every day in Iraq, and yeah, the Iraqis "love" us.

Ummm, k.

Fact: Oh, and all the people that were working for certain connected companies, and organizations that are benefiting from the war, were, or are still working for those companies. The movie just show you how they are connected, now, if you want to connect the dot, you can, or you can just sit there and scream conspiracy theorists.

You mean like Cheney and Halliburton? Oh wait, Cheney severed controlling ties with Halliburton as per the rules of the presidency/vice presidency. Fact is, there are only a handful of companies able to handle such a large reconstruction effort. Hallibrton happened to be one of them. Some mom and pop agency could not.

Yeah, we sit here and say that they (the Iraqis) deserve it, but let's reverse the situation. Some people would storm in your house in the middle of the night and treat you like criminals, even though you've done nothing wrong, and all in the name of "bringing peace to your country". How much you have liked the "helpers" then?

Actually, a more apt analogy would be if someone accidentally stormed in your house while looking for somebody else. Civilian casulties were *very* low in this war. The military went through great pains to minimize them. And yes, there are always going to be depraved human beings who, as soldiers, mistreat others and even brutalize them. It happens in civilized societys, and it happens in war. It does not *ever* make it right, but do not sensationalize it when it should not be,

Do you hate terrorists? You do right? After all, they did kill >3000 innocent Americans. Now, is that hatred enough for you to want to cut off the heads of any citizen of national origins from which these terrorists are spawned? Is that hatred enough for you to string their bodies (we're talking just innocent people from the same country), mutilated, burnt, and still beating on them? You gotta stop and think why. We sit here with our TVs, watching our "credible" new sources, googling for information and we think we know every thing on earth. Ignorance is what spawned that hatred my friend.


What are you trying to say? They hate us more than we hate them? No, we will not stoop to their level and behead someone on TV and parade the corpse around. Did some soldiers act wrongly and abuse prisoners at Abu Gharaib? Yes, and they will be dealt with. I just don't see what your rhetorical questios are leading to in the last point....

Phew...that was longer than I had planned. :)
 

sillymofo

Banned
Aug 11, 2003
5,817
2
0
To Wart:

1) There are money to be made, serious money.

2) How the hell are you gonna give something up that you don't own in the first place? Some one come and ask you for lunch money, you don't have it so they proceed to beat the living crap out of you... does that make any sense? You might know that the money comes from US treasury and there are plenty of it in banks, but you don't own any of it, how the fcuk do you give it up?

So Taliban can't deliver Bin Laden, lets say if they can, or want to capture him, and then handed him over to the US, do you know what would happen to their government? Think fool.

Not to mention most of the hi-jackers were Saudis.

3) Have you ever played connect the dots when you were a kid? Now if the dots on the paper represent a car (and would appear as a car to most people), and you say you can make it into a balloon, by all mean. Color it your way, I'm not trying to change your point of view, I'm just pointing out what I see.

4) Define your "many years" is it 2-3 years, up until one of Bin Laden's son got married?

5) Are you just so dense that you don't see Bush is a failure? We are in the largest deficit, EVER, everything else aside, that to me screams incompetent.

6) We're not talking about Clinton, and as a politician, sometimes, he has to go with the grain. And even our own intelligence is so convoluted, and faulty, what make you think that the Russians are any better? Last I check, we did win the coldwar.

7) Uh... check your "facts" again...

8) Did you see the movie? The part where this one guy from the new Iraq commission keep saying "There are a lot of money to be made once the oil starts flowing"? And exactly my point, the US would have a lot of control over the oil, because we can't really place an embargo on ourselves.

9) Thank you for finally agreeing with me on something.

10) It's obvious that you DID NOT see the movie, because there were a lot more names and connections than that.

11) Civilian casualties were not low in this war "The roof, the roof is on fire... we don't need water let the motherfcuker burn... " ring a bell? The storming in the houses are not accidentally, because the troops are going house to house and are looking at everybody. I guess you don't fully understand the word oppression, nor have you ever had to deal with it.

12) It's not about stooping to their level, while you're thinking that you're a holly saviour that god sent down to rid and save the world from these "babaric evil doers", that's just YOUR opinion.

I'm not looking for an argument, but please, if you do, make sure that you cover your bases.
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Originally posted by: Yossarian
Originally posted by: TheWart
Civilian casulties were *very* low in this war.

what were they?

I'd like to know too.

If the Iraqi civilian casualties are *very* low, 9/11 must've been almost non-existant. It was only a measly 3,000 civilians.
 

TheWart

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 2000
5,219
1
76
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
To Wart:

1) There are money to be made, serious money.

Yea there is, but it is not a zero sum game. The Central Asian steppes badly need monetary investment, and the Uncoal deal would pump billions through the region. It would help as long as they didn't squander it a la Saudi Arabia.

2) How the hell are you gonna give something up that you don't own in the first place? Some one come and ask you for lunch money, you don't have it so they proceed to beat the living crap out of you... does that make any sense? You might know that the money comes from US treasury and there are plenty of it in banks, but you don't own any of it, how the fcuk do you give it up?

This does not make sense to me. The Taliban knew where Bin Laden was (heck so did the Pakistanis most likely). They ran camps with him. The *least* they could have done was say that they will help us find him. Saying that he was not there, or that they could not contact him is blatantly false.

So Taliban can't deliver Bin Laden, lets say if they can, or want to capture him, and then handed him over to the US, do you know what would happen to their government? Think fool.

Not to mention most of the hi-jackers were Saudis.

I reccomend reading some books re: Central Asia and Afghan in particular. The indigenous people of Afghanistan for the most part detest the foreign Arabs who came into the region during the Afghan resistance. OBL was one of these. Kicking OBL out may have hurt the Taliban in the eyes of Islamic extremists around the world, but it was their choice to make. They decided to try and fight it out.

3) Have you ever played connect the dots when you were a kid? Now if the dots on the paper represent a car (and would appear as a car to most people), and you say you can make it into a balloon, by all mean. Color it your way, I'm not trying to change your point of view, I'm just pointing out what I see.

What I meant was that I do not understand what you were originally saying. Are the bin Ladens profiting fianncially from the war? Probably, if they have a half decent broker who invested their money in defense companies. Does that mean that they tell OBL to go wreak havoc so they can make money? Highly unlikely imo as the defense companies would make about as much $$ regardless.

4) Define your "many years" is it 2-3 years, up until one of Bin Laden's son got married?

They denounced mid 1990's....

5) Are you just so dense that you don't see Bush is a failure? We are in the largest deficit, EVER, everything else aside, that to me screams incompetent.

Largest in dollar terms, yes. Largest as percent of GDP? No. That is like saying you are 1000x richer than your great great grandfather who only had 100 dollars in the bank back in 1850. Well, that 100$ back then is like 1 million now. That is due to inflation. Our debt is large, but not that large as a % of GDP. And with economic growth not seen since the 80's, I think we will be fine.

6) We're not talking about Clinton, and as a politician, sometimes, he has to go with the grain. And even our own intelligence is so convoluted, and faulty, what make you think that the Russians are any better? Last I check, we did win the coldwar.

The KGB, now FSB was not at fault for losing the Cold War. Whatever you can say about the Russians, they have a high quality intelligence. That does not mean however, that their claim is true.

7) Uh... check your "facts" again...
l
Lemme look around....

8) Did you see the movie? The part where this one guy from the new Iraq commission keep saying "There are a lot of money to be made once the oil starts flowing"? And exactly my point, the US would have a lot of control over the oil, because we can't really place an embargo on ourselves.

Well, seeing as that Iraq pretty much controls its own oil now, I guess you could say the Bush/Cheney/Illuminati cabal failed.

9) Thank you for finally agreeing with me on something.

..

10) It's obvious that you DID NOT see the movie, because there were a lot more names and connections than that.

No, I won't lie, I have not seen it. I most likely will sometime in the next few months....I'll look into that then.

11) Civilian casualties were not low in this war "The roof, the roof is on fire... we don't need water let the motherfcuker burn... " ring a bell? The storming in the houses are not accidentally, because the troops are going house to house and are looking at everybody. I guess you don't fully understand the word oppression, nor have you ever had to deal with it.

Thankfully, I have not truly been repressed (in the political sense) because I live in a country where that doesn't fly. I will get some figures/numbers for you in a bit....


12) It's not about stooping to their level, while you're thinking that you're a holly saviour that god sent down to rid and save the world from these "babaric evil doers", that's just YOUR opinion.

I'm not looking for an argument, but please, if you do, make sure that you cover your bases.

oookay. Now I see what you meant. Yea, there is the chance that we garnered more hate from Iraqi's/arabs in general for going into Iraq, but I think that once the security situation winds down, and the people in Iraq can look back on what they went through, they *will* view the US as at least allies in their fight against Hussein.

I understand, and I would feel bad if this thread got closed for this argument belonging in pol/news, but I just don't like to see things believed that I think need to be more closely examined. No hard feelings.
 

Fingolfin269

Lifer
Feb 28, 2003
17,948
34
91
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: Yossarian
Originally posted by: TheWart
Civilian casulties were *very* low in this war.

what were they?

I'd like to know too.

If the Iraqi civilian casualties are *very* low, 9/11 must've been almost non-existant. It was only a measly 3,000 civilians.

Nice way to compare two things that are completely different. And yes, I would say the same thing if 9/11 had happened somewhere in the Congo.
 

sillymofo

Banned
Aug 11, 2003
5,817
2
0
Guess who's working on the "Iraqi controlled" oil in Iraq right now?

Sure, the US knew where Bin Ladin was too, and with far superior firepower, manpower, equipments, intelligence, he's still Usama Bin Hiding. (Or is he? hmmmm)

Just like we were sure that there are WMDs in Iraq.

Oh... and a $100 of US dollars at any time was never equivalent to $1,000,000 now. So according to your "inflation" calculation, when did we have the largest deficit?
 

Fingolfin269

Lifer
Feb 28, 2003
17,948
34
91
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Guess who's working on the "Iraqi controlled" oil in Iraq right now?

Sure, the US knew where Bin Ladin was too, and with far superior firepower, manpower, equipments, intelligence, he's still Usama Bin Hiding. (Or is he? hmmmm)

Just like we were sure that there are WMDs in Iraq.

Oh... and a $100 of US dollars at any time was never equivalent to $1,000,000 now. So according to your "inflation" calculation, when did we have the largest deficit?

Who is working on the "Iraqi controlled" oil right now?
 

sillymofo

Banned
Aug 11, 2003
5,817
2
0
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Guess who's working on the "Iraqi controlled" oil in Iraq right now?

Sure, the US knew where Bin Ladin was too, and with far superior firepower, manpower, equipments, intelligence, he's still Usama Bin Hiding. (Or is he? hmmmm)

Just like we were sure that there are WMDs in Iraq.

Oh... and a $100 of US dollars at any time was never equivalent to $1,000,000 now. So according to your "inflation" calculation, when did we have the largest deficit?

Who is working on the "Iraqi controlled" oil right now?
Me! Maybe not. But it's some contractors from Texas that's guarded by US troops that are working the oil fields. I'm sure you can find the sources, I have full confident in your abilities and intelligence to find this information.
 

Fingolfin269

Lifer
Feb 28, 2003
17,948
34
91
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Guess who's working on the "Iraqi controlled" oil in Iraq right now?

Sure, the US knew where Bin Ladin was too, and with far superior firepower, manpower, equipments, intelligence, he's still Usama Bin Hiding. (Or is he? hmmmm)

Just like we were sure that there are WMDs in Iraq.

Oh... and a $100 of US dollars at any time was never equivalent to $1,000,000 now. So according to your "inflation" calculation, when did we have the largest deficit?

Who is working on the "Iraqi controlled" oil right now?
Me! Maybe not. But it's some contractors from Texas that's guarded by US troops that are working the oil fields. I'm sure you can find the sources, I have full confident in your abilities and intelligence to find this information.

Why would I find the sources when you're the one spouting off the 'facts'. Obviously you already 'know' so you'll know exactly where to go. You can't cop out that easily because you saw a movie and now think you know things.
 

sillymofo

Banned
Aug 11, 2003
5,817
2
0
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Guess who's working on the "Iraqi controlled" oil in Iraq right now?

Sure, the US knew where Bin Ladin was too, and with far superior firepower, manpower, equipments, intelligence, he's still Usama Bin Hiding. (Or is he? hmmmm)

Just like we were sure that there are WMDs in Iraq.

Oh... and a $100 of US dollars at any time was never equivalent to $1,000,000 now. So according to your "inflation" calculation, when did we have the largest deficit?

Who is working on the "Iraqi controlled" oil right now?
Me! Maybe not. But it's some contractors from Texas that's guarded by US troops that are working the oil fields. I'm sure you can find the sources, I have full confident in your abilities and intelligence to find this information.

Why would I find the sources when you're the one spouting off the 'facts'. Obviously you already 'know' so you'll know exactly where to go. You can't cop out that easily because you saw a movie and now think you know things.
"The U.S. Army Corp of Engineers awarded Halliburton subsidiary KBR the main contract to fight oil well fires and reconstruct Iraqi oil fields. Its total contract is worth $10 billion."



Kindly STFU!
 

TheWart

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 2000
5,219
1
76
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Oh... and a $100 of US dollars at any time was never equivalent to $1,000,000 now. So according to your "inflation" calculation, when did we have the largest deficit?

I said as simply an example in order to show what inflation can do.

Basically, our deficit as percentage of GDP is hovering under 40%, whereas most other industrialized nations (such as France/Britain) it is well over 40.
 

TheWart

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 2000
5,219
1
76
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Originally posted by: Fingolfin269
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Guess who's working on the "Iraqi controlled" oil in Iraq right now?

Sure, the US knew where Bin Ladin was too, and with far superior firepower, manpower, equipments, intelligence, he's still Usama Bin Hiding. (Or is he? hmmmm)

Just like we were sure that there are WMDs in Iraq.

Oh... and a $100 of US dollars at any time was never equivalent to $1,000,000 now. So according to your "inflation" calculation, when did we have the largest deficit?

Who is working on the "Iraqi controlled" oil right now?
Me! Maybe not. But it's some contractors from Texas that's guarded by US troops that are working the oil fields. I'm sure you can find the sources, I have full confident in your abilities and intelligence to find this information.

Why would I find the sources when you're the one spouting off the 'facts'. Obviously you already 'know' so you'll know exactly where to go. You can't cop out that easily because you saw a movie and now think you know things.
"The U.S. Army Corp of Engineers awarded Halliburton subsidiary KBR the main contract to fight oil well fires and reconstruct Iraqi oil fields. Its total contract is worth $10 billion."



Kindly STFU!

And like I said, Halliburton is probably the only company that can handle such a task unless the Army wanted to award the contract out in a bunch of different sections.
 

sillymofo

Banned
Aug 11, 2003
5,817
2
0
I'm done!

:confused: and when the hell did Europe sneaked in the conversation? :confused:

EDIT: Give me $10 billion, not only I'll fix the fields, put out the fire, I'll fcuking give you a themepark based out of petroleum products.

EDIT II: And you still don't know shiet.
 

Fingolfin269

Lifer
Feb 28, 2003
17,948
34
91
Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
I'm done!

:confused: and when the hell did Europe sneaked in the conversation? :confused:

EDIT: Give me $10 billion, not only I'll fix the fields, put out the fire, I'll fcuking give you a themepark based out of petroleum products.

EDIT II: And you still don't know shiet.

I still don't get what you're trying to prove by saying Halliburton is fixing the oil fields and putting "X" around the Iraqi controlled parts. Too many conspiracy theories running around out there.
 

sillymofo

Banned
Aug 11, 2003
5,817
2
0
Alright, alright, I'll play your game, so according to most of your truths, this is what I should be saying:

Bush is a great president, competent, intelligent, and saved us and the world from a horrible, horrible regime, an evil dictator. He has no agendas, no other initiatives other than doing the world a favor, good on ya Dubya.

Halliburton is just a happy go lucky company that got these no-bid contracts from the government, and that's just it. And I'm just jealous because I don't own any of Halliburton.

The war in Iraq is just, we're doing a fabulous job, our troops are safe and the people of Iraq are welcoming us with open arms because we saved them. Sure, some of them are dying, but hey, that's just casualties of war, everybody die in war.

There are plenty of WMDs in Iraq, it's just that there are too much sand, and they are really good at hiding them, but, we'll find them someday.

The Saudis and Bin Ladens have no ties with the Bushes, they're just foreign investors.


Did I miss anything else? Oh, and all these wackos left-wing moronic conspiracy theorists are just that, they should read what the news tell them and leave it at that. Believe in everything the government tell them because it's the ultimate truth, why the heck would the government lie to the people. What a bunch of idiots huh?

For real, I'm done with this thread.