JD50
Lifer
- Sep 4, 2005
- 11,918
- 2,884
- 136
you can't disprove someone's opinion. it's impossible. if i think Carcillo is the best, it's only my opinion... it's not up for debate.
Semantics.
you can't disprove someone's opinion. it's impossible. if i think Carcillo is the best, it's only my opinion... it's not up for debate.
re-read the first fucking line of bullshit in the post i quoted and was responding to. there's no way in hell they would have won that series without Crosby. if you think so, you didn't understand my reply and have no concept of "matchups" in the playoffs. are you just having fun today with all this, or are you actually serious about some of the stuff you're posting?And they'd say the same thing about Ovechkin, what's your point?
he sure was one-dimensional in that Habs series though. these crazy guys called sports writers agree with me, for the most part.
far from it. you can't disprove someone's opinion. it's impossible. you can disagree with it, but we're all free to think whatever we want. if i think Hal Gill is the most skilled defenseman in the NHL, it's simply my opinion. I'm not stating it as fact.Semantics.
offense = two dimensional player. now i've heard it all.5 goals, 5 assists and 34 shots on goal is 1D? Sure dude. What is Crosby's 1 goal 4 assists 12 SoG then? 1/4 dimensional? /chuckle
he sure was one-dimensional in that Habs series though. these crazy guys called sports writers agree with me, for the most part.
far from it. you can't disprove someone's opinion. it's impossible. you can disagree with it, but we're all free to think whatever we want. if i think Hal Gill is the most skilled defenseman in the NHL, it's simply my opinion. I'm not stating it as fact.
re-read the first fucking line of bullshit in the post i quoted and was responding to. there's no way in hell they would have won that series without Crosby. if you think so, you didn't understand my reply and have no concept of "matchups" in the playoffs. are you just having fun today with all this, or are you actually serious about some of the stuff you're posting?
pick up the latest SI and read the article on Crosby.There's no winning this debate with the Crosby nut huggers. The guy could be in the stands watching the game and you guys would give him credit for a win because the opposing team was blinded by the light emanating from him. Give it a rest, you could at least admit that he had a bad series.
offense = two dimensional player. now i've heard it all.
i'll never, ever, ever give up on this one. Who is saving near-goals behind his tender and who is found floating around the OTHER red line at centre ice? Does Ovy EVER backcheck? Do you even know what a two-dimensional player is?No, actually you haven't heard it all. Ovechkin vs Habs in 7 games = no penalty minutes. Crosby already has 2 penalty minutes and should have been called for breaking his stick on the goalpost. Ovi also logged over a minute more of ice time. Who helped his team more?
Just give up.
pick up the latest SI and read the article on Crosby.
i'll never, ever, ever give up on this one. Who is saving near-goals behind his tender and who is found floating around the OTHER red line at centre ice? Does Ovy EVER backcheck? Do you even know what a two-dimensional player is?
you make it sound like i am alone in my assertions that he is a better player. perhaps you are the one who should "give up". anyone starting a team and looking for a centrepeice to build around right now that would take Ovy over Sid right now is batshit lunatic crazy. but i'm the only one that thinks so, so i'm CRAAAAaaAaAaZZyzyzyYyYYYY.Look up the difference between a winger and a center.
Shall I look up stats on hits as well? You really want to get embarrassed more?
I'll just predict your next post:
"Crosby may have fewer assists, much fewer goals and shots on goal, more penalty minutes, less minutes on ice, less hits, a temper tantrum that should have been a penalty but I swear he did the intangibles! And that's why he's the best player in the world!"
/crickets
Can you even name one thing that Crosby has done better so far than Ovechkin vs Montreal?
Didn't think so.
Now you're talking about centerpieces and saying nobody would take a back to back MVP over Crosby to build a team with. You must enjoy making yourself look stupid.
ROFL, do I get to answer? Do Cups and gold medals count? not in SP33DEMON'S BOOKS!!! bahahahhah
back to back MVPs, yes, that is a nice achievement. can we live in the now?
are you honestly saying you'd take Ovy over Crosby right now? please answer honestly and live in the now so I can fully gauge your utter and undeniable cluelessness.
what, you're proud of yourself because you DISAGREE with someone on an internet forum? you're a real winner. congrats, you proved that you had a differing opinion. go print out Ovechkin's stats and roll them up real tight and cram them where the sun doesn't shine.This is like taking candy from a baby.
what, you're proud of yourself because you DISAGREE with someone on an internet forum? you're a real winner. congrats, you proved that you had a differing opinion. go print out Ovechkin's stats and roll them up real tight and cram them where the sun doesn't shine.
you can have my candy, just don't take my Crosby.
btw i'm hoping he tanks tonight because I'm rooting for the Habs. and if he does have a bad game, his team will likely lose. that's a nod to the impact he has on EVERY SINGLE GAME HE'S EVER PLAYED IN.
Crosby. Ovechkin is a one dimensional sniper who doesn't even know who his goalie is because he's never been in that zone. Crosby is an all around player and makes the players around him better. Has already won Olympic Gold and the Stanley Cup and was the go to guy on both squads.
There are usually Ovechkin lovers out there running rampant though because he's more exciting. They think that translates to him being better for some reason.
All of you sound like morons. debating on who's better, what are you, two years old.
Anyways, I hope Halak doen't show up tonight. Hopefully it'll be another game 1 showing.
