No, this running game will take you far. In all of their wins excluding Tenn Schaub has passed for less than 250 yards. With Foster, Tate and the D, they don't need Leinart to be superman
You just dont get it. This is no longer the NFL of 2000 where the Ravens won with a mediocre if not sub par QB. To make it to the playoffs, through the playoffs, and win a Superbowl, you need a good QB. You simply cannot have an offense that never passes the ball, you need at least some threat to pass or else the defense will just stack the box with 8 or even 9 guys, and then no OL and/or RB would be able to get anywhere.
Also, a running game, or reliance thereon, is a death knell against a team that can score quick and is first to grab the lead. Heck, just look at what the Ravens did to the Texans. this isn't a question as to whether or not the Texans are a playoff threat, its that with Schaub people were starting to talk about them as AFC favorites and Superbowl contenders. Without Schaub that goes down the drain. Even if they make the playoffs its like an immediate loss.
Besides, not even Pete Carroll had enough faith in his old QB at USC Leinart to even give him a look in the more than one occasion he was a free agent.
The Texans have a great defense. #1 in total yards, #2 in passing yards, #5 in rushing yards, #3 in third down conversions allowed, and tied for #4 in points allowed.
All they have to do is be competent, not great on offense to be a playoff threat.
Again, we're talking about contenders to actually do something in the playoffs. Also a strong running game can be the cause of favorable defensive statistics because your offense is controlling the clock, simply not allowing the other team time to move the ball and rack up stats. The minute the reverse is done to them, or say they get down in score, that's when mediocrity tends to get exposed.