BenSkywalker
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 1999
- 9,140
- 67
- 91
I only see one person getting the X18 series and that person is BFG, he'll want that better Anisotropic Filtering ATI has to offer.
That would be me, not BFG
I only see one person getting the X18 series and that person is BFG, he'll want that better Anisotropic Filtering ATI has to offer.
Originally posted by: DRavisher
Is the ability to force AA with HDR on a very interesting feature? Does not games with full HDR implementations allow AA in the ingame settings anyway (not counting FarCry, but what about SC, AOE and DoD?)? Just asking.Originally posted by: Ackmed
Almost every review site has them. AF is much better on ATi's new cards, and adaptive AA is on par, or better than NV's TA AA. Not to mention HDR+AA, which is how it should have been done to start with. Not that it would have been playable...
Originally posted by: TinyTeeth
I wonder when R580 is to arrive. If it actually will have 32 pipelines, and the R520 has 16...
Originally posted by: mindgam3
Lets not forget the 512megs or ram will help alot for future games I mean just look at the Fear demo results!
I did some research: According to ATI themselves they are ready to ship it right now (like that's going to happen...) but the Swedish website NordicHardware.se say a release in the very beginning of 2006 is more realistic.Originally posted by: Kyanzes
Originally posted by: TinyTeeth
I wonder when R580 is to arrive. If it actually will have 32 pipelines, and the R520 has 16...
I don't believe they are able to bring it to the market before next summer.
Originally posted by: VIAN
I think it definitely wasn't worth it to wait for ATI to move there ass. I only see one person getting the X18 series and that person is BFG, he'll want that better Anisotropic Filtering ATI has to offer.
Is this a hardware or game engine limitation?
Ironic isn't that the company that started the whole AF mess with QUAK and bilinear AF is the one (finally) taking steps to clean it back up.
Originally posted by: TinyTeeth
I did some research: According to ATI themselves they are ready to ship it right now (like that's going to happen...) but the Swedish website NordicHardware.se say a release in the very beginning of 2006 is more realistic.Originally posted by: Kyanzes
Originally posted by: TinyTeeth
I wonder when R580 is to arrive. If it actually will have 32 pipelines, and the R520 has 16...
I don't believe they are able to bring it to the market before next summer.
I don't know how reliable this information is, but that would be perfect timing for me because I'm planning to build a system in February 2006.
Originally posted by: BenSkywalker
Is this a hardware or game engine limitation?
Either/both- an engine can be designed to support AA w/HDR running nV hardware as you can see in DoD:S, however if you use the straightforward path that most devs do AA will not work with HDR on nVidia hardware while it can on the newer ATi hardware. Unfortunately as of now most games simply disable AA whenever HDR is enabled as that was the hardware limitation.
Originally posted by: DRavisher
Is the ability to force AA with HDR on a very interesting feature? Does not games with full HDR implementations allow AA in the ingame settings anyway (not counting FarCry, but what about SC, AOE and DoD?)? Just asking.Originally posted by: Ackmed
Almost every review site has them. AF is much better on ATi's new cards, and adaptive AA is on par, or better than NV's TA AA. Not to mention HDR+AA, which is how it should have been done to start with. Not that it would have been playable...
Originally posted by: MBrown
So. Who one this round?
Originally posted by: Hacp
Ya kinda how I feel. ATI reclaimed performance crown but we have to wait one month to get those parts. Right now, all that is availible is the neutered XL, which IMO no one should get unless they hate the 7800GT IQ.
Originally posted by: CaiNaM
Originally posted by: Hacp
Ya kinda how I feel. ATI reclaimed performance crown but we have to wait one month to get those parts. Right now, all that is availible is the neutered XL, which IMO no one should get unless they hate the 7800GT IQ.
how can you say ati "reclaimed the performance crown" when the card hasn't even shipped (and won't for a min. of another month)?
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: MBrown
So. Who one this round?
Right now it appears ATI slightly won the performance crown.
Nvidia won the delivery crown.
Personally I am waiting until the next generation cards to upgrade![]()
Originally posted by: Hacp
Originally posted by: CaiNaM
Originally posted by: Hacp
Ya kinda how I feel. ATI reclaimed performance crown but we have to wait one month to get those parts. Right now, all that is availible is the neutered XL, which IMO no one should get unless they hate the 7800GT IQ.
how can you say ati "reclaimed the performance crown" when the card hasn't even shipped (and won't for a min. of another month)?
Kinda like when people said AMD X2 was the better performer of the x2 and P-D, even though it took 2 weeks to 1 month to actually mass deliver the parts to most people????
Originally posted by: Genx87
So far the reviews I have seen look pretty good for the card. The x1800XT wins in most areas at the high end.
Ill await anands review but it looks like a solid card. Just such a shame it is showing up nearly 5 months after the 7800GTX. I hope Anand also tests with the newest Nvidia drivers so we can get an idea on what performance gains are too be had there.
I am curious to see what Nvidia's answer is besides releasing a new set of drivers.
Originally posted by: Hacp
Of as in between. Also history doesn't matter as we are talking about performance crown.