lolfail9001
Golden Member
- Sep 9, 2016
- 1,056
- 353
- 96
VI, actually.Is it confirmed that asus crosshair IV hero is the best oc board?![]()
And yes, it is.
VI, actually.Is it confirmed that asus crosshair IV hero is the best oc board?![]()
Whohoo. Ill try and get my 1800X to 4.3 on water this friday.VI, actually.
And yes, it is.
Rest in Piece CentroX's house.Whohoo. Ill try and get my 1800X to 4.3 on water this friday.
And you wan't to claim the reviewers are lying?P. S. XFR was totally working, unless you want to claim CPU-Z 1.78.3 lies.
In this study, the prototype (known as engineering samples) of a motherboard we have still not quite ready. It was not yet ready motherboard BIOS and several limitations, including in support of XMP and overclocking configurations there. However, these problems will be resolved once the final version of the product.
Talking about goalpost moving, i should probably compile list of reactions to Ryzen memory latency.
Where is "XFR" mentioned in this sentence? Also, XFR is disconnected from mobo BIOS. And it is not really "overclocking", if we are real.And you wan't to claim the reviewers are lying?
Few pages ago, around 2 gigs/sec more than Skylake at similar memory timings and same frequency.It will also be interesting to see how much more bandwidth efficient (if any) Ryzen is vs. the Intel IMC
It is a dealsalter for me, because my workload is memory latency sensitive and may in fact be similar to fritz (conceptually it is not that different)I know lets magnify in on latency sub tests and fritzchess, obviously if it fails there thats a deal breaker for sure.
Some of the complaints are just crazy. Gee, it misses on an obscure and mostly useless Fritch thing. Guess I better run out and spend 600 or 700 more on an Intel setup. Nah, don't think so. I'd rather add another GTX 1080 to the system instead.I know lets magnify in on latency sub tests and fritzchess, obviously if it fails there thats a deal breaker for sure.
Bugs yes, shortcomings no. For example the AIDA L3 writes on Ryzen is low compared to Skylake, which might be due to it being victim instead of write-back. Microcode patches won't change that.Cpu shortcomings/bugs can be patched via microcode right?
If it's not for you get Intel then.It is a dealsalter for me, because my workload is memory latency sensitive and may in fact be similar to fritz (conceptually it is not that different)
Also, there's the whole deal with power consumption in P95 shooting up from ~120W power delta at stock (accounting for PSU and VRM, it can be stretched to fit 95W TDP) to over 200W at just 4Ghz. That thing actually hits heat density issues at just 4Ghz, that's kind of insane. And spells big trouble for my dreams of ITX Ryzen build running at 3.7Ghz all core.
It is a dealsalter for me, because my workload is memory latency sensitive and may in fact be similar to fritz (conceptually it is not that different)
You do realize that in Ryzen case, Prime95 only consumes a smidge more than Cinebench, because of design trade-off? Basically the P95 consumtion is a good "worst-case" ballpark for any 100% CPU usage scenario on Ryzen.You do realize P95 uses AVX right?
Symbolic execution. Different thing on paper, but concept of choosing state to run is not dissimilar to what Fritz does, not to mention that state sets naturally can get fairly titanic in sizes (hell, a sample test can run in billions already) and you naturally have to jump from one end of the set to another. On each iteration.What is your workload?
Whatever that may be, since last week it consists of fritzchess and the passmark's prime numbers and physics. I really think he should get a Nehalem with first gen ddr, it had super low memory latency. No need fooling around with anything elseWhat is your workload?
AMD's pricing is really the star of this show -- they sensed that enthusiasts wanted "more cores" and wanted those cores to be decent and not priced to the moon, and they appear to have delivered.
What's surprising to me is how Intel has not yet cut prices on Broadwell-E. They have to know that nobody is going to want to buy those now, except maybe the top 10 core.
Fritz scales almost linearly with frequency, so you're better off with higher clock speeds.You do realize that in Ryzen case, Prime95 only consumes a smidge more than Cinebench, because of design trade-off? Basically the P95 consumtion is a good "worst-case" ballpark for any 100% CPU usage scenario on Ryzen.
And i compile software on my PC, too!
Symbolic execution. Different thing on paper, but concept of choosing state to run is not dissimilar to what Fritz does, not to mention that state sets naturally can get fairly titanic in sizes (hell, a sample test can run in billions already) and you naturally have to jump from one end of the set to another. On each iteration.
Of course it scales linearly with frequency when you are comparing identical uarches, man.Fritz scales almost linearly with frequency, so you're better off with higher clock speeds.
same uarch thoughFritz scales almost linearly with frequency, so you're better off with higher clock speeds.
![]()
1. The only board Gibbo pushed 1700 to 4Ghz. Granted, these folks managed to do it on B350, but with 1700X.Where was it confirmed?