K1052
Elite Member
- Aug 21, 2003
- 53,735
- 48,403
- 136
what about a submissive one?![]()
Don't kink shame Ted Cruz.
what about a submissive one?![]()
The 'shitting your pants' talk is part of it, it's minimizing what's very obvious and again, commonly shared concern. You can say pants shitting all you want but donors, senators, and reps are calling on him to bow out. That's not chicken little talk.
But you haven't wanted to discuss, you've wanted compliance and agreement. You literally just described commentary to the alternative as 'pants shitting'. Is that really discussion to you?Silly me and here I thought this was a discussion board.
Please continue yelling at the clouds then, I’ll just watch.
But you haven't wanted to discuss, you've wanted compliance and agreement. You literally just described commentary to the alternative as 'pants shitting'. Is that really discussion to you?
What about if you replace her with Warnock at the head of the ticket?
This is obviously not going anywhere. In the future, when Democrats, or anyone else, is expressing concern with the direction things are going, please don't refer to their commentary as 'pants shitting' lest you look like a jackass when half the sitting congressmen say the same goddamn thing.I suggest you go check the posts you quoted of me and while you are at you can check your replies.
One of us is interested in having a discussion and the other just wants to be heard.
You’ve made it perfectly clear you aren’t interested in having any sort of discussion so you can fuck right off now.
And this is the problem with all the "fantasy football" type lineups that are now coming out of the woodwork. They all have negatives/downsides, they're just not as front and center as "Biden is old" as it's been drilled into everyone's head for the last 5+ years. Generic candidate is great, because it's something that everyone internally pictures as an ideal candidate. They have no warts. Well, that's not reality and there is no perfect candidate.
This is obviously not going anywhere. In the future, when Democrats, or anyone else, is expressing concern with the direction things are going, please don't refer to their commentary as 'pants shitting' lest you look like a jackass when half the sitting congressmen say the same goddamn thing.
There’s some definite upsides to Harris as well as some downsides. The balance of these are difficult to assess.Trump's spent the last 4 solid years painting Biden as old and incompetent. In theory he'd have 4 months to try to define Harris in a manner that doesn't come off as overtly racist. Seems like a taller order than simply hammering Biden on his age for the rest of the year. Possibly hence why R groups are threatening to sue (impotently) if he comes off the ticket.
As stated, I gave an alternative long ago, Harris/Pete. I think it's a fine ballot and will do as well as any alternative, and it at least doesn't look hypocritical. As a bonus, all attacks on it from Republicans look either racist or anti-LGBTQ.It’s pants shitting when you refuse to game out an alternative. I’m sorry me calling out bullshit when I see it is upsetting to you, I’m a both sides guy in that respect![]()
As stated, I gave an alternative long ago, Harris/Pete. I think it's a fine ballot and will do as well as any alternative, and it at least doesn't look hypocritical. As a bonus, all attacks on it from Republicans look either racist or anti-LGBTQ.
As stated, I gave an alternative long ago, Harris/Pete. I think it's a fine ballot and will do as well as any alternative, and it at least doesn't look hypocritical. As a bonus, all attacks on it from Republicans look either racist or anti-LGBTQ.
Biden steps down, VP becomes Pres, claims reelection, picks new VP?Anything that gets Pete on the ballot I’m all for. The question is how does that work? Voters voted for Biden, not for Harris. If he steps aside, will there be a backlash if she is the new nominee? If he doesn’t step aside then what? Whoever the nominee is has to win and they can only win if democrats are united in their support. That goes for Biden if he stays in or anyone else, period, that’s the reality we are in.
And does keeping Joe result in winning PA and the general?That's a loss in PA and in turn the general.
They're waiting for him to lose because that takes Harris out too and opens things up for the 2028 primary.
As a bonus, all attacks on it from Republicans look either racist or anti-LGBTQ.
Well we're always chasing those last three independents right?The last 8 years have shown that this is not a deterrent for voters.
And does keeping Joe result in winning PA and the general?
These are the facts on the ground, in my opinion, but let’s understand Democratic support for what it really is, a deeply suppressed feeling they do not deserve to win hence self destruction when winning gets real.There’s some definite upsides to Harris as well as some downsides. The balance of these are difficult to assess.
Biden’s upsides and downsides are well known with the exception of the Democratic Party support as a whole. As you’ve been documenting that support continues to crumble which is shifting the balance negative.
Oh yeah? A lot of us predicted this would happen before Biden even ran again. I'm sorry some of y'all couldn't and still can't see the giant neon signs blazing 'THIS IS A REALLY DUMB AND RISKY CHOICE'I am watching Ari Melbourne’s fact based Political Analysis July 10 show and he made the same point I did in this thread. Nobody can predict what will happen in politics. Compare that simple fact with all the catastrophizing going on in this thread, how clairvoyants we have here. You would think it’s a Republican convention.
