obese employees cost companies an additional $4000 annually

Jul 10, 2007
12,041
3
0
hiring managers, take note before you hire that fatty.
do your employer and all of us a favor and just don't.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39276141/ns/health-diet_and_nutrition/

WASHINGTON — Obesity puts a drag on the wallet as well as health, especially for women.

Doctors have long known that medical bills are higher for the obese, but that is only a portion of the real-life costs.

George Washington University researchers added in things like employee sick days, lost productivity, even the need for extra gasoline — and found the annual cost of being obese is $4,879 for a woman and $2,646 for a man.

That is far more than the cost of being merely overweight — $524 for women and $432 for men, concluded the report being released Tuesday, which analyzed previously published studies to come up with a total.

Why the difference between the sexes? Studies suggest larger women earn less than skinnier women, while wages don't differ when men pack on the pounds. That was a big surprise, said study co-author and health policy professor Christine Ferguson.

Researchers had expected everybody's wages to suffer with obesity, but "this indicates you're not that disadvantaged as a guy, from a wage perspective," said Ferguson, who plans to study why.

Then consider that obesity is linked to earlier death. While that is not something people usually consider a pocketbook issue, the report did average in the economic value of lost life. That brought women's annual obesity costs up to $8,365, and men's to $6,518.

The report was financed by one of the manufacturers of gastric banding, a type of obesity surgery.

The numbers are in line with other research and are not surprising, said Dr. Kevin Schulman, a professor of medicine and health economist at Duke University who wasn't involved in the new report.

Two-thirds of Americans are either overweight or obese, and childhood obesity has tripled in the past three decades. Nearly 18 percent of adolescents now are obese, facing a future of diabetes, heart disease and other ailments.

Looking at the price tag may help policymakers weigh the value of spending to prevent and fight obesity, said Schulman, pointing to factors like dietary changes over the past 30 years and physical environments that discourage physical activity.

"We're paying a very high price as a society for obesity, and why don't we think about it as a problem of enormous magnitude to our economy?" he asks. "We're creating obesity and we need to do a man-on-the-moon effort to solve this before those poor kids in elementary school become diabetic middle-aged people."

A major study published last year found medical spending averages $1,400 more a year for the obese than normal-weight people. Tuesday's report added mostly work-related costs — things like sick days and disability claims — related to those health problems.

It also included a quirky finding, a study that calculated nearly 1 billion additional gallons of gasoline (3.8 billion liters) are used every year because of increases in car passengers' weight since 1960.
 

Ns1

No Lifer
Jun 17, 2001
55,420
1,600
126
there's an obese woman that takes her dog to obedience class every saturday

after class, she ALWAYS goes to Del Taco and orders a supersize combo meal.
 

erikistired

Diamond Member
Sep 27, 2000
9,739
0
0
you'd rather have fat people at home collecting unemployment and possibly disability?
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
I won't hire fat people or smokers. I've known this forever too didnt need an article.

Smokers is so obvious ... wasting 5 minutes every hour or less dripping out to suck down a cig.
 
Last edited:

QueBert

Lifer
Jan 6, 2002
22,943
1,138
126
Cars get less MPG when you go 85 instead of 65, but that can't can't possibly be adding to additional gallons of gasoline being used right? Companies shouldn't hire speeders either if that's going to be the logic.
 

dfuze

Lifer
Feb 15, 2006
11,953
0
71
And that annual cost doesn't include the cost of the meals to stay that way either.
 
Jul 10, 2007
12,041
3
0
Cars get less MPG when you go 85 instead of 65, but that can't can't possibly be adding to additional gallons of gasoline being used right? Companies shouldn't hire speeders either if that's going to be the logic.

only applies if your company reimburses you for miles driven.
and it's far easier to spot a fat person than a habitual speeder.
 

erikistired

Diamond Member
Sep 27, 2000
9,739
0
0
hiring managers, people who spend their time posting on anandtech on their blackberry instead of working are costing you thousands a year. don't hire them.
 

PingSpike

Lifer
Feb 25, 2004
21,758
602
126
And that annual cost doesn't include the cost of the meals to stay that way either.

My experience is that healthier foods tend to cost more. If I mostly consumed potato chips and root beer I could get the same amount of calories a lot cheaper.
 

dfuze

Lifer
Feb 15, 2006
11,953
0
71
My experience is that healthier foods tend to cost more. If I mostly consumed potato chips and root beer I could get the same amount of calories a lot cheaper.
Yes, healthier foods tend to cost more up front, but unhealthy foods have more of a back end cost associated (weight gain, lack of energy, heart issues, ...). Don't forget too, that the amount of calories in a small amount of junk food usually equals out to much more food in healthy food.
 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
37
91
Which is why it will always be OK to descriminate against fat people.

Don't cry about the cost of food. Some cheap Reeboks are $30. Walking/Jogging around a park/neighborhood are FREE after that initial small investment ;)
 

Ns1

No Lifer
Jun 17, 2001
55,420
1,600
126
My experience is that healthier foods tend to cost more. If I mostly consumed potato chips and root beer I could get the same amount of calories a lot cheaper.

cooking healthy foods at home = way cheaper than buying fast food
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,395
8,558
126
My experience is that healthier foods tend to cost more. If I mostly consumed potato chips and root beer I could get the same amount of calories a lot cheaper.

a potato is about a calorie per gram. potatoes in a bag are ridiculously cheap by the pound. $0.25 per pound or so. potato chips are $3 or $4 per pound. potato chips are about 5x more calorie dense than potatoes. so potato calories are 1/2 or 1/3 the $ cost. of course you have to cook the potato but they're about the easiest thing to make.
 
Last edited:

mb

Lifer
Jun 27, 2004
10,233
2
71
how much is 1 lb. of potato chips vs. 1 pound of potatoes?

:hmm:

16oz of lays classic potato chips = 2400 calories, 160g fat.
16oz of lays baked potato chips = 1920 calories, 32g fat.

16oz baked potato = 417 calories, 1g fat.