Originally posted by: shadow9d9
Originally posted by: TheSkinsFan
Originally posted by: Ausm
Sure it will!! What's the problem with the Insurance companies raping everyone raw and laughing all the way to the bank? I really don't see how a
400% increase in profits in the last ten years would do this.
That's a bullshit number by the way. In order to put that increase in perspective, you'd have to take into account the
fact that average HI profit margins are still only sitting at roughly 3 to 5%. Where's all that money going from the supposed 400% increase? It sure as hell isn't present in their actual profit margins, or in their salaries which are already factored into those profit margins, so it must be being
spent somewhere... on something. One must conclude that overhead for the HI has also risen almost 400%. So, perhaps it's the costs
to the HI companies that might be a problem? hmm...
The
fact is that HI profits account for
less than 2% of the total U.S. expenditures on healthcare. That bears repeating:
HI profits account for less than 2% of the total U.S. expenditures on healthcare!
Any 5th-grader could deduce that the
real problem must lie elsewhere. hmm...
If you truly want to address the issue and fix the actual problems, you'd first have to acknowledge the above. The problem, for too many of you, is that these facts get in the way of most of your rhetoric -- you just gotta have your fall-guy or boogieman, don't ya?
Yep, 3%.. that is how some of these companies have increased profits by 1000% in 5 years.. gotcha.
Yeah, the ceos of these companies admitting they deny people for profit all the time.. that's cool.
Want some facts?
Take a look at a recent report "Insuring Health or Ensuring Profit?; A look at the Financial Gains of Washington's Health Insurers." According to the report, the big three carriers in Washington, Regence BlueShield, Premera Blue Cross and Group Health Cooperative saw profits increase from $11 million in 2002 to $243 million in 2003 and $431 million in 2006. Their cash surplus went from $833 million in 2002 to $2.2 billion (with a "B") in 2006. Interestingly enough they did it while covering less people. Over 2.37 million people were covered by the three in 2002 compared to 1.9 million in 2006.
http://vancouver.injuryboard.c...r.aspx?googleid=230780
Potter, who spent 15 years at CIGNA, said health plans have a financial incentive to cancel the policies of their most costly members and have implemented strategies to do so. ?They look carefully to see if a sick policyholder may have omitted a minor illness, a pre-existing condition, when applying for coverage, and then they use that as justification to cancel the policy,? he testified. And canceling policies for even a small number of such members can have ?a big effect? on the bottom line, he added. ?Where is the logic and the humanity of having pre-existing conditions not covered in our society?? Potter asked. He noted that his testimony wasn?t aimed at CIGNA specifically, but rather at an industry that he said is ?taking this country in the wrong direction.?
http://www.aishealth.com/Bnow/hbd070909.html
""They confuse their customers and dump the sick ? all so they can satisfy their Wall Street investors," said Wendell Potter, who retired as CIGNA's vice president of corporate communications last year. He spent nearly 15 years at the company and four years at Humana."
"Potter, for instance, recalled a trip on a corporate jet from Philadelphia, where CIGNA is headquartered, to Connecticut, where the company's health insurance business is based in Bloomfield. During the flight, he was served lunch on gold-rimmed china with a gold-plated knife and fork.
"I realized for the first time that someone's insurance premiums were paying for me to travel in such luxury," he said on his blog."
"He condemned insurers' efforts to get rid of unprofitable customers, sell policies that can mislead consumers and offer very limited coverage, and pay out as small a portion of premiums as possible for claims in order to boost profits and please Wall Street."
"Potter described in written testimony how insurers use "purging" ? unrealistic rate increases ? to drive off less profitable employers. Citing a USA Today report, he recalled how CIGNA boosted rates in 2006 for the Entertainment Industry Group Insurance Trust so much that for some family plans, premiums would have topped $44,000 a year."
"CIGNA, responding to Potter's testimony, said Wednesday, "Although we respect that there are different opinions on the solutions, we strongly disagree with the suggestion that, motivated by profits, the insurance industry has deliberately attempted to confuse or unfairly treat covered individuals.""
http://www.courant.com/busines...tjun25,0,4107201.story
"Among the other testimony heard by the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation was that of Robin Beaton. It reflected some of the insurance company tactics condemned by Potter.
It was a nightmare scenario. The day before she was scheduled to undergo a double mastectomy for invasive breast cancer, Robin Beaton's health insurance company informed her that she was "red flagged" and they wouldn't pay for her surgery. The hospital wanted a $30,000 deposit before they would move forward. Beaton had no choice but to forgo the life-saving surgery.
Beaton had dutifully signed up for individual insurance when she retired from nursing to start a small business. She had never missed a payment, but that didn't matter. Blue Cross cited two earlier, unrelated conditions that she hadn't reported to them when signing up ? acne and a fast beating heart ? and rescinded her policy.
Beaton pleaded with the company and had her doctors write letters on her behalf to no avail. It was not until Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX) personally called Blue Cross that her policy was reinstated and she could undergo surgery. In that year, Beaton's tumor doubled in size, leading to further complications necessitating the removal of her lymph glands as well."