Obama wants to give pay raises for performing teachers

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

oogabooga

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2003
7,807
3
81
I still don't get how they rate teachers and determine "that one deserves more money that one doesn't". I'm all fine for good teachers getting rewarded and bad teachers getting the can. But whose to say a teacher is good or bad? how is it determined?

To students, the president warned them to not ?even think about dropping out of school? and to parents he urged accountability and a recognition that the government ?cannot turn off the TV or put away the video games.?
You mean parents have to help the Gov't raise children? *scratches head*
 

Socio

Golden Member
May 19, 2002
1,732
2
81
Originally posted by: Genx87
http://news.yahoo.com/s/politi...0310/pl_politico/19824

Now this is something I can get behind. I wonder how the labor entrenched democrat party will approach this?

This is yet another idiotic idea;

All this will do is change the way teachers teach, they will stop teaching the curriculum and start teaching how to pass the tests. Instead of an education the only thing students will come away with is memorized test answers. The teacher will get a big fat raise because most of his/her students passed with A?s and B?s and they will have the test scores to prove it.
 

babylon5

Golden Member
Dec 11, 2000
1,363
1
0
Originally posted by: Socio

All this will do is change the way teachers teach, they will stop teaching the curriculum and start teaching how to pass the tests. Instead of an education the only thing students will come away with is memorized test answers. The teacher will get a big fat raise because most of his/her students passed with A?s and B?s and they will have the test scores to prove it.

I am not sure it'd be as easy as you describe it. If memorization is so easy, everyone would get near 1600 on SAT.

Originally posted by: oogabooga
I still don't get how they rate teachers and determine "that one deserves more money that one doesn't". I'm all fine for good teachers getting rewarded and bad teachers getting the can. But whose to say a teacher is good or bad? how is it determined?

I don't have the answer, but how are teachers in Western Europe or Asia got paid? Do they all have union protect their jobs, or there is some measurement to their performance?

Whatever is its, I am glad Obama is in charge and make a change. What good is it to USA if it continues to be at low ranking in education system in a 1st world country?
 
Feb 19, 2001
20,155
23
81
Originally posted by: JeepinEd
The teacher's union will never allow it.

On a side note:
This past weekend, I spoke to a friend of mine who is a 3rd grade teacher.
She is currently waiting to find out whether or not she is going to get a pink slip this week.

In her school, there is a teacher who is so bad, that the principal tried to fire him. The union stepped in and said he has tenure, you can't fire him. The principal ended up having to put this teacher to work watching kids in detention. The really sad thing is that if the school does have to let a teacher go, it will be my friend. Even though she recently won a teacher of the year award for the district, the looser teacher watching kids in detention has tenure over her.

They would have to keep a teacher, who the principal feels is unfit to teach and fire the teacher who is one of the best in the entire district.

The power these unions have is down right scary.

In CA you get tenure after TWO (2) years. Good God. There were terrible teachers and I mean 2 years is nothing. Arnold put an emergency ballot in 2005? 2006? that pushed it to 5 years and the people voted it down. What's more disgusting is people protested at our school about it being an evil proposition. Seriously?
 

shadow9d9

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
8,132
2
0
No way to judge what is good or bad teaching. Pie in the sky idea that sounds good in theory but is impossible in real life. No surprise you got behind this one.
 

miketheidiot

Lifer
Sep 3, 2004
11,060
1
0
Originally posted by: Modelworks
To me teaching is something you either have a knack for or you don't. It isn't something that you read a book and now you are a teacher. How we judge who is good/bad is really a hard question to answer. One place to start would be to just ask the students, they often know who is good and who isn't better than anyone on the outside.

I had a teacher during high school that would just walk in the door, write what page numbers he wanted us to study on the board, and then walk over to his desk , put his feet up and lean back in his chair the entire class. He was the schools football coach so to them was untouchable.

did you go to my highschool? :confused:
 

miketheidiot

Lifer
Sep 3, 2004
11,060
1
0
Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
Originally posted by: winnar111
There's nothing wrong at all with 'teaching the test' as some morons put it. Better to evaluate which districts are saddled with failure, then cut and run with our funds.

Well... there are good and bad things when teaching the test.

It's easy to standardize and easy to point out laggers. It also does build basic skill sets, like spelling, mathematics and reading.

On the other hand, it severely curtails critical thinking and independent thought. When these kids get to college, it's a totally different environment. You usually aren't being force-fed facts, instead you are given situations and you have to think critically about what's involved. So while good test scores might get them into a top tier school, they might not have the skill sets necessary to succeed in college.

The public school system should do both, foster development of basic skill sets and also provide the tools necessary to think critically about situations and identify the key points that are being addressed.

Plus, we really need public schools to be in session for the entire year. We are no longer an agarian society where kids need to go home and help with the harvest. Personally, I would not mind seeing schools move to a semester based session that gives 2-3 weeks off in between each semester. That way, kids are in school year round and are being continually exposed to new material. So it'll be something like 15 weeks on, 2 weeks off, 15 weeks on, 2 weeks off, 15 on, 3 weeks off (to round it off to 52). That's what other countries, that far exceed what the US in mathematics and science, are doing in their public systems.

in places like the arctic north (where i live) such a setup would be borderline inhumane, but i could definitely see lengthening the school year substantially.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
I do agree with Obama's sentiment and direction on this just look what has happened to county administrators who have pushed the same idea.

It's not going to happen, and at the same time he has ticked off his base. That's what you call a win/win.
 

Socio

Golden Member
May 19, 2002
1,732
2
81
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
No way to judge what is good or bad teaching. Pie in the sky idea that sounds good in theory but is impossible in real life. No surprise you got behind this one.

They only way to judge them without showing favoritism is statistically against other teachers and they only way to do that is the pass/fail rate of their students which of course will inevitably lead to what I said in a previous post;

Originally posted by: Socio

All this will do is change the way teachers teach, they will stop teaching the curriculum and start teaching how to pass the tests. Instead of an education the only thing students will come away with is memorized test answers. The teacher will get a big fat raise because most of his/her students passed with A?s and B?s and they will have the test scores to prove it.
 

JD50

Lifer
Sep 4, 2005
11,928
2,921
136
Originally posted by: shadow9d9
No way to judge what is good or bad teaching. Pie in the sky idea that sounds good in theory but is impossible in real life. No surprise you got behind this one.

Seriously? You must not have kids if you don't think that it's possible to tell the difference between a good teacher and a bad teacher.
 

Xellos2099

Platinum Member
Mar 8, 2005
2,277
13
81
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: 0marTheZealot
Originally posted by: winnar111
There's nothing wrong at all with 'teaching the test' as some morons put it. Better to evaluate which districts are saddled with failure, then cut and run with our funds.

Well... there are good and bad things when teaching the test.

It's easy to standardize and easy to point out laggers. It also does build basic skill sets, like spelling, mathematics and reading.

On the other hand, it severely curtails critical thinking and independent thought. When these kids get to college, it's a totally different environment. You usually aren't being force-fed facts, instead you are given situations and you have to think critically about what's involved. So while good test scores might get them into a top tier school, they might not have the skill sets necessary to succeed in college.

The public school system should do both, foster development of basic skill sets and also provide the tools necessary to think critically about situations and identify the key points that are being addressed.

Plus, we really need public schools to be in session for the entire year. We are no longer an agarian society where kids need to go home and help with the harvest. Personally, I would not mind seeing schools move to a semester based session that gives 2-3 weeks off in between each semester. That way, kids are in school year round and are being continually exposed to new material. So it'll be something like 15 weeks on, 2 weeks off, 15 weeks on, 2 weeks off, 15 on, 3 weeks off (to round it off to 52). That's what other countries, that far exceed what the US in mathematics and science, are doing in their public systems.

in places like the arctic north (where i live) such a setup would be borderline inhumane, but i could definitely see lengthening the school year substantially.


Length of the school doesn't matter, it is the quality that matter the most. Even if people push for longer school year, it really mean jack shit if the student are unwilling to learn. You say math and science is lacking? You got to thank teacher union and politic for it. As long as politician are pushing for school not for education but for personal politically gain, nothing good will come out of it. Ever wonder why private school is better? There is no government involvement.
 

jagec

Lifer
Apr 30, 2004
24,442
6
81
Originally posted by: PingSpike
Originally posted by: JeepinEd
They would have to keep a teacher, who the principal feels is unfit to teach and fire the teacher who is one of the best in the entire district.

The power these unions have is down right scary.

Why is she in this union that discards her in favor of some douchebag that has just been around a long time?

These days people don't really have a choice over whether or not they are in a union. If you work in an area that's unionized, either you (a)become a member, pay your union dues, and abide by whatever they decide, or (b)Don't become a member, still have to pay "non-member" dues to the union, and still abide by whatever they decide.

Originally posted by: JACKDRUID
great idea! the first raise should be according to ratings / comments from ratemyprofessor.com usually very accurate.

What do professors--who are hired to do research, not to teach--have to do with high school teachers, who are actually supposed to teach?
 

TheSlamma

Diamond Member
Sep 6, 2005
7,625
5
81
This is not a new idea and it's a very good idea... what that means is it'll never happen.
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
Originally posted by: halik
I'm sure the union will have something to say about that...

The only thing the unions will say when the federal government gets involved is YES righjt away Mr President!!
 

MovingTarget

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2003
9,002
115
106
There are two sides to this coin. A friend of mine (who was in my graduating class) last year was awarded Teacher of the Year by the school he worked at. Two weeks after he, and six other people at other schools who had received similar awards, were given pink slips. Why? Budget cuts. The tenure rules made them cut the newest hires, so no matter how effective they were at their job, they, and the kids, lost out.

On the other side, there is a reason that these rules exist. You really can build up a lot of experience when teaching, and that really does help. You shouldn't have to be worried about your job constantly when you do a good job and shouldn't be subject to what are, lets face it, often political firings.

Honestly though, the federal gvt needs to but out here. Let this be sorted out by the states without requiring that they spend a bunch of $$ that they still don't have, with little result (NCLB). Unfunded mandates are a drain on the already-stretched system. :thumbsdown:
 

MovingTarget

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2003
9,002
115
106
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: Genx87

Arent the pay scales negotiated by the union?

Yeap. Why do you ask?

One of the complaints is the teachers union is one of the problems in our education system. You ask how can we attract people by paying new people crap? The answer is right now we cant due to union mandates with regards to compensation.

It takes two to tango. Pay scales are negotiated by the administration and by the union.

In private schools, maybe. However, in the public schools, a lot of these scales are determined by the state/system at large with no room for individual salary negotiation.
 

Auryg

Platinum Member
Dec 28, 2003
2,377
0
71
Originally posted by: her209
Get rid of the entire public school infrastructure and put in a internet-based educational system.

Text

Already on the way. Honestly, it's not such a bad idea, or at least it's not any worse than the current school system.

Honestly, I think student surveys for judging teachers would be fine, but they should be filtered and individual (each student has some sort of alphanumeric string or something) so they would weed out any results from kids that mark everyone highly/poorly.
 

quest55720

Golden Member
Nov 3, 2004
1,339
0
0
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Originally posted by: halik
I'm sure the union will have something to say about that...

The only thing the unions will say when the federal government gets involved is YES righjt away Mr President!!

Keep dreaming the union will tell Obama to take a hike. I like the idea but it just won't work thanks to the teachers union.

I think we need to make better use of the voucher system. Put pressure on the in efficient school districts to do better with good old fashion competition.
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
Originally posted by: MrMatt
Originally posted by: mugs
Been done before at lower levels, and was abandoned. It seems that when you tie teacher pay to the performance of their students, teachers cheat.

yup. Read freakanomics? They tried this in Chicago and it absolutely bombed.

Just because a progranm such as this was administered wrong does not mean that is has No merits!!

We have many many teachers who can`t teach bottom line.
When I was in college the joke was so what are you going to do with yourself now that you have a degree and cannot make it in your chosen field? Well I am going to be a teacher was quite often the reply!!

Sad...huh??
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
Originally posted by: MotF Bane
Originally posted by: Slick5150
Originally posted by: MotF Bane
Originally posted by: spidey07
Agree that the teachers union will never allow it. Here in KY they let a few teachers go for things like not showing up for a month, showing up drunk everyday, etc.

The union is outraged and is suing to get them reinstated.

-edit-
It's a good idea, give it a shot. I just don't see those goals as attainable given the teacher's unions.

Stories like that are what give unions a bad name.

Especially when they're made up by people like spidey07.

Not saying their aren't bad teachers who deserve to be fired, but I'm also fairly confident the teacher's union did not sue to get a teacher that showed up to work drunk everyday reinstated to their job.

I've heard similar stories elsewhere, from sources I do know to be reliable.

more than likely the majority of those stories are made up or shall we say out and out lies....