Obama to unveil big increase in required mpg

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

GuitarDaddy

Lifer
Nov 9, 2004
11,465
1
0
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: GuitarDaddy
Originally posted by: techs
Originally posted by: DLeRium
Link

And, this sounds like what happened when the Congress wanted the car companies to put seat belts in their cars. The car companies said it would cost 2,000 a car in 1961!
Set a difficult standard, and guess what? With old fashioned ingenuity American business can do it.

The problem your argument overlooks is that current petroleum engine technology is 100yrs old and is an extremely mature platform. Virtually all of the efficiency available from the platform has already been squeezed out of it, so the only way to cost effectively increase MPG is reduce weight and power.

Mandating high MPG while offering no rational objective on how to acheive it is bad policy IMO, and totally ignores the reality of the situation for the sake of pandering to green intrests. Instead of more of the same old dumb energy policy maybe we should try thinking out of the box and place incentives that reward innovative alternatives and stop with the meaningless MPG standards.

Viable alternatives like CNG which would reduce emissions more than any increases in MPG ever could with the added benie of ending our dependancy on foreign oil could providing a logical next step in weaning ourselves off fossil fuels. And the environmental reality is that the total carbon footprint of all the cars in the US is less than the coal fired electricty plants so in the big picture MPG standards do little to address our emmisions problems.

Where is the change we were promised? Where is a strong concerted forward thinking energy policy? They might as well mandate flying cars by 2012

The problem with that is?

The problem is when you reduce weight and power you diminish
capacity, functionality, durability, comfort and safety. I for one will pay for this protection as long as 80,000lb tractor trailers frequent the freeways I drive. Small econoboxes are fine for in city commuting, but for those living in the suburbs or rural areas and having long commutes and tons of freeway driving they are not safe and practical IMO unless conditions change.

What's your recommendation? More of the same? Try and force change in the American publics taste for Auto's by mandating what American auto companies can make? Seems like thats what got us where we are now!
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,848
6,386
126
Originally posted by: GuitarDaddy
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: GuitarDaddy
Originally posted by: techs
Originally posted by: DLeRium
Link

And, this sounds like what happened when the Congress wanted the car companies to put seat belts in their cars. The car companies said it would cost 2,000 a car in 1961!
Set a difficult standard, and guess what? With old fashioned ingenuity American business can do it.

The problem your argument overlooks is that current petroleum engine technology is 100yrs old and is an extremely mature platform. Virtually all of the efficiency available from the platform has already been squeezed out of it, so the only way to cost effectively increase MPG is reduce weight and power.

Mandating high MPG while offering no rational objective on how to acheive it is bad policy IMO, and totally ignores the reality of the situation for the sake of pandering to green intrests. Instead of more of the same old dumb energy policy maybe we should try thinking out of the box and place incentives that reward innovative alternatives and stop with the meaningless MPG standards.

Viable alternatives like CNG which would reduce emissions more than any increases in MPG ever could with the added benie of ending our dependancy on foreign oil could providing a logical next step in weaning ourselves off fossil fuels. And the environmental reality is that the total carbon footprint of all the cars in the US is less than the coal fired electricty plants so in the big picture MPG standards do little to address our emmisions problems.

Where is the change we were promised? Where is a strong concerted forward thinking energy policy? They might as well mandate flying cars by 2012

The problem with that is?

The problem is when you reduce weight and power you diminish
capacity, functionality, durability, comfort and safety. I for one will pay for this protection as long as 80,000lb tractor trailers frequent the freeways I drive. Small econoboxes are fine for in city commuting, but for those living in the suburbs or rural areas and having long commutes and tons of freeway driving they are not safe and practical IMO unless conditions change.

What's your recommendation? More of the same? Try and force change in the American publics taste for Auto's by mandating what American auto companies can make? Seems like thats what got us where we are now!

Negative on all accounts. You sacrifice HP/Torque aka Performance, not much else.
 

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,976
141
106
Originally posted by: Xellos2099
Is this mpg even achievable without cutting weight or less horsepower on gas vehicle? Before everyone scream hybrid not everyone can afford 30-40k car.


you forgot. the eco-KOOKS don't want you to drive. the whole point of this is to demoblize the common citizen and force you all into public transportation and make you live in soviet style transit villages.

 

TheSlamma

Diamond Member
Sep 6, 2005
7,625
5
81
Even Honda's little Fit is a 2600lb car with all the safety equipment it has, I cannot see a gasoline engine pushing a 2600lb car and getting 42mpg. Especially since the EPA rates are based in traffic conditions and all accessories and AC running. He might as well come out and say everything has to be a hybrid if that 42mpg rumor is true, I think 42mpg sounds far fetched rumor though, lets wait and see the real number.

But maybe this administration figured out a way to *Change* the energy content of Gasoline ;)
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
Originally posted by: TheSlamma
Even Honda's little Fit is a 2600lb car with all the safety equipment it has, I cannot see a gasoline engine pushing a 2600lb car and getting 42mpg. Especially since the EPA rates are based in traffic conditions and all accessories and AC running. He might as well come out and say everything has to be a hybrid if that 42mpg rumor is true, I think 42mpg sounds far fetched rumor though, lets wait and see the real number.

But maybe this administration figured out a way to *Change* the energy content of Gasoline ;)

Its called technological improvements. The car companies and thier bed buddies big oil have been sitting on it for decades. Here is a small taste... more to come http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=15153

Take that type of technology, improve upon it and there you go. 42mpg easy. Even more if it were hybridized.

Great move by Obama
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
Originally posted by: IGBT

you forgot. the eco-KOOKS don't want you to drive. the whole point of this is to demoblize the common citizen and force you all into public transportation and make you live in soviet style transit villages.

Ugh... you're either joking, paranoid, or a total moron. Cars will never go away in America and no-one is wanting them too. Certainly not our govt. that is in bed with Big Oil.

Originally posted by: Xellos2099
Is this mpg even achievable without cutting weight or less horsepower on gas vehicle? Before everyone scream hybrid not everyone can afford 30-40k car.

I dont know what hybrids you are looking at, but I just bought a brand new Honda Civic hybrid for 21k including the 10 year 100k mile warranty. I drove my 40 miles to work today and got 53mpg for the one trip, of course traffic was perfect. I am averaging about 46 mpg.
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
Thw Government (and Unions) have been slowly killing the Auto Industry with regulations as well as contracts.

Obama is only escalating it.

-John
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
Originally posted by: Zorkorist
Thw Government (and Unions) have been slowly killing the Auto Industry with regulations as well as contracts.

Obama is only escalating it.

-John

Can you imagine trying to start a bew car business today?

It wouldn't be allowed.

-John
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,848
6,386
126
Originally posted by: Zorkorist
Originally posted by: Zorkorist
Thw Government (and Unions) have been slowly killing the Auto Industry with regulations as well as contracts.

Obama is only escalating it.

-John

Can you imagine trying to start a bew car business today?

It wouldn't be allowed.

-John

double fail
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
Originally posted by: Zorkorist
Originally posted by: Zorkorist
Thw Government (and Unions) have been slowly killing the Auto Industry with regulations as well as contracts.

Obama is only escalating it.

-John

Can you imagine trying to start a bew car business today?

It wouldn't be allowed.

-John

If you had a decent idea, and could make a decent car with good mileage, it would sell like crazy - especially without the big 3's union issues to pay for. That is if the big 3 would allow it.

The reason new companies haven't popped up inthe US over the past 30-40 years is because of the big 3, not the economy or the govt. They either buy them out early, or snuff them with higher paid lawyers before they get anywhere. The big 3 have owned the industry and locked anyone else out. The only chance anyone else had was to do it in other countries.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
A realistic goal with today's technology. While the present downturn w/govt bailouts provides the right opportunity for the automakers to retool away from using yesterday's technology, as they've been doing for far too long.

Look, I've said it before, I'll say it again: if you don't want govt mandates, don't take govt money. TANSTAAFL.
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: Zorkorist
Originally posted by: Zorkorist
Thw Government (and Unions) have been slowly killing the Auto Industry with regulations as well as contracts.

Obama is only escalating it.

-John

Can you imagine trying to start a bew car business today?

It wouldn't be allowed.

-John

If you had a decent idea, and could make a decent car with good mileage, it would sell like crazy - especially without the big 3's union issues to pay for. That is if the big 3 would allow it.

The reason new companies haven't popped up inthe US over the past 30-40 years is because of the big 3, not the economy or the govt. They either buy them out early, or snuff them with higher paid lawyers before they get anywhere. The big 3 have owned the industry and locked anyone else out. The only chance anyone else had was to do it in other countries.

If,
If, If!

How about, I have a decent idea for an auto, and I think I can make it cheap, but please don't let the GVovernment o Unions get wind of it.

-John
 

Xellos2099

Platinum Member
Mar 8, 2005
2,277
13
81
It is a very short sighted goal and I don't believe Obama has a degree in engineering. How does he know 42mpg is doable and why would a politician dictate on how consumer products is going to work if ti is not their field of experty? People are pushing for hybrid but it got its share of problem like the batteries which could prove to be even more polluting than the so call greenhouse gas. For those who dis suv saying it is a waste of gas. Think of it this way. You got a 6 family members household and a normal sedan is not going to be big enough, so the choice is either 2 sedan or one suv. I don;t know about you but having oen suv on the street surely as hell beat 2 sedan on the street, either in term of traffic or gas usage.
 

MovingTarget

Diamond Member
Jun 22, 2003
9,002
115
106
I would say that it is about time. Our engineers are more than capable of meeting this mandate.
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: TheSlamma
Even Honda's little Fit is a 2600lb car with all the safety equipment it has, I cannot see a gasoline engine pushing a 2600lb car and getting 42mpg. Especially since the EPA rates are based in traffic conditions and all accessories and AC running. He might as well come out and say everything has to be a hybrid if that 42mpg rumor is true, I think 42mpg sounds far fetched rumor though, lets wait and see the real number.

But maybe this administration figured out a way to *Change* the energy content of Gasoline ;)

Its called technological improvements. The car companies and thier bed buddies big oil have been sitting on it for decades. Here is a small taste... more to come http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=15153

Take that type of technology, improve upon it and there you go. 42mpg easy. Even more if it were hybridized.

Great move by Obama


That car is only going to get like 25mpg, no where near 42. You are only got to get to 42 with hybrids. The price of new car just went up several thousand...
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: Vic
A realistic goal with today's technology. While the present downturn w/govt bailouts provides the right opportunity for the automakers to retool away from using yesterday's technology, as they've been doing for far too long.

Look, I've said it before, I'll say it again: if you don't want govt mandates, don't take govt money. TANSTAAFL.

The government owns the auto indunstry right, they no longer have a say in the matter. This is not going to turn out well.
 

CycloWizard

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
12,348
1
81
Originally posted by: sandorski
No. Waiting for "The Market" is a policy of Fail. It is too Short-Sighted to be of any value.
You think the government has better long-term vision than individuals or companies? The mess that GM et al. are in now is nothing compared to the hole the government has dug for itself and us.
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
I would say that it is about time. Our engineers are more than capable of meeting this mandate.

I see what you did there... of corse any engineer could do it, given long enough.

Government, aint it grand?

-John
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
I would say that it is about time. Our engineers are more than capable of meeting this mandate.

Making it is one issue, keeping it affordable and keeping it practical is another.
 

Squisher

Lifer
Aug 17, 2000
21,204
66
91
Originally posted by: Vic
A realistic goal with today's technology.

Only if you downsize the average American vehicle to what you see in other countries.

 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
Originally posted by: Xellos2099
It is a very short sighted goal and I don't believe Obama has a degree in engineering. How does he know 42mpg is doable and why would a politician dictate on how consumer products is going to work if ti is not their field of experty? People are pushing for hybrid but it got its share of problem like the batteries which could prove to be even more polluting than the so call greenhouse gas. For those who dis suv saying it is a waste of gas. Think of it this way. You got a 6 family members household and a normal sedan is not going to be big enough, so the choice is either 2 sedan or one suv. I don;t know about you but having oen suv on the street surely as hell beat 2 sedan on the street, either in term of traffic or gas usage.

Obama's "plan" is arbitrary at least. It has no basis in science or economics.

It is pure political posturing.

-John
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
Originally posted by: Zorkorist
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: Zorkorist
Originally posted by: Zorkorist
Thw Government (and Unions) have been slowly killing the Auto Industry with regulations as well as contracts.

Obama is only escalating it.

-John

Can you imagine trying to start a bew car business today?

It wouldn't be allowed.

-John

If you had a decent idea, and could make a decent car with good mileage, it would sell like crazy - especially without the big 3's union issues to pay for. That is if the big 3 would allow it.

The reason new companies haven't popped up inthe US over the past 30-40 years is because of the big 3, not the economy or the govt. They either buy them out early, or snuff them with higher paid lawyers before they get anywhere. The big 3 have owned the industry and locked anyone else out. The only chance anyone else had was to do it in other countries.

If,
If, If!

How about, I have a decent idea for an auto, and I think I can make it cheap, but please don't let the GVovernment o Unions get wind of it.

-John

If if if? What do you want from me? It wasnt the govt, or the unions that stopped it all along. It was the big 3.
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: Zorkorist
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: Zorkorist
Originally posted by: Zorkorist
Thw Government (and Unions) have been slowly killing the Auto Industry with regulations as well as contracts.

Obama is only escalating it.

-John

Can you imagine trying to start a bew car business today?

It wouldn't be allowed.

-John

If you had a decent idea, and could make a decent car with good mileage, it would sell like crazy - especially without the big 3's union issues to pay for. That is if the big 3 would allow it.

The reason new companies haven't popped up inthe US over the past 30-40 years is because of the big 3, not the economy or the govt. They either buy them out early, or snuff them with higher paid lawyers before they get anywhere. The big 3 have owned the industry and locked anyone else out. The only chance anyone else had was to do it in other countries.

If,
If, If!

How about, I have a decent idea for an auto, and I think I can make it cheap, but please don't let the GVovernment o Unions get wind of it.

-John

If if if? What do you want from me? It wasnt the govt, or the unions that stopped it all along. It was the big 3.

You might want to look at the government requires you put on auto before you say that. ANd labor is a factor as well too.
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: TheSlamma
Even Honda's little Fit is a 2600lb car with all the safety equipment it has, I cannot see a gasoline engine pushing a 2600lb car and getting 42mpg. Especially since the EPA rates are based in traffic conditions and all accessories and AC running. He might as well come out and say everything has to be a hybrid if that 42mpg rumor is true, I think 42mpg sounds far fetched rumor though, lets wait and see the real number.

But maybe this administration figured out a way to *Change* the energy content of Gasoline ;)

Its called technological improvements. The car companies and thier bed buddies big oil have been sitting on it for decades. Here is a small taste... more to come http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=15153

Take that type of technology, improve upon it and there you go. 42mpg easy. Even more if it were hybridized.

Great move by Obama


That car is only going to get like 25mpg, no where near 42. You are only got to get to 42 with hybrids. The price of new car just went up several thousand...

Read again, I said technology LIKE that, and further iterations of that, and or other similar improvements. That particular model gave V8 power from a V6, and improved efficiency 10-20% over standard engines. take that a few steps further, put it in a 4 and 6 cyl models and we are there. Car companies have been sitting on their asses, and I am glad for the requirement. .
 

retrospooty

Platinum Member
Apr 3, 2002
2,031
74
86
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: Zorkorist
Originally posted by: retrospooty
Originally posted by: Zorkorist
Originally posted by: Zorkorist
Thw Government (and Unions) have been slowly killing the Auto Industry with regulations as well as contracts.

Obama is only escalating it.

-John

Can you imagine trying to start a bew car business today?

It wouldn't be allowed.

-John

If you had a decent idea, and could make a decent car with good mileage, it would sell like crazy - especially without the big 3's union issues to pay for. That is if the big 3 would allow it.

The reason new companies haven't popped up inthe US over the past 30-40 years is because of the big 3, not the economy or the govt. They either buy them out early, or snuff them with higher paid lawyers before they get anywhere. The big 3 have owned the industry and locked anyone else out. The only chance anyone else had was to do it in other countries.

If,
If, If!

How about, I have a decent idea for an auto, and I think I can make it cheap, but please don't let the GVovernment o Unions get wind of it.

-John

If if if? What do you want from me? It wasnt the govt, or the unions that stopped it all along. It was the big 3.

You might want to look at the government requires you put on auto before you say that. ANd labor is a factor as well too.

2 different posts from you replying to me and you didnt bother to read or understand either of them.

What I was saying is that the big 3 are the ones that have stopped any smaller upstarts in the USA for the past 30-40 years. They stifle them outr before they have a chance. It's not the govt or the unions. W