Jaskalas
Lifer
- Jun 23, 2004
- 35,727
- 10,030
- 136
And you're suggesting that WE have a right to decide who uses that specific location...
Is this Mosque at this location not something you think can be protested?
And you're suggesting that WE have a right to decide who uses that specific location...
Exactly how do you want them to "prove it"?
Please prove to me YOUR loyalty, or your church's loyalty and patriotism. Show me.
Is this Mosque at this location not something you think can be protested?
Could be worse, could be Mormon Masters.You must bow down to your Muslim Master.
Then I support the right for all of your neighbors to carry (or even have in your home) the machine gun (or any gun) but I do not support your right to carry one (unless they think like you) because I don't like the way you think. :sneaky:
Could be worse, could be Mormon Masters.
Their beliefs are just as whacked if not more.
If they are looking for the government to buy them their ammo neither do I.
Here is the truth of the matter. They have a legal right, no question. A constitutional right, no question. But the truth is if they truly loved this country, sympathized with their fellow citizens, and were truly disgusted with the act perpetrated there, they wouldn't build there. They wouldn't do it.
Nah protest away, it's your Constitutional right to do so.Is this Mosque at this location not something you think can be protested?
There you go, I totally agree with you. I'm glad you came to your senses.Here is the truth of the matter. They have a legal right, no question. A constitutional right, no question. But the truth is if they truly loved this country, sympathized with their fellow citizens, and were truly disgusted with the act perpetrated there, they wouldn't build there. They wouldn't do it.
Here is the truth of the matter. They have a legal right, no question. A constitutional right, no question. But the truth is if they truly loved this country, sympathized with their fellow citizens, and were truly disgusted with the act perpetrated there, they wouldn't build there. They wouldn't do it.
Here is the truth of the matter. They have a legal right, no question. A constitutional right, no question. But the truth is if they truly loved this country, sympathized with their fellow citizens, and were truly disgusted with the act perpetrated there, they wouldn't build there. They wouldn't do it.
Explain? What does the government buying have to do with this? Is there money from the government going to this or something (that I don't know about)?
I guess you missed the interview I posted with the spokesman from the mosque ...
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2010/08/12/interview-with-ground-zero-mosque-spokesman/
When asked about funding he says ..."We are looking at State money, local money, federal dollars, potentially Homeland Security money, we're look at putting together terrorist abatement programming""
I don't want any of my money go to any of the churches. With that being said, this isn't the real reason you are against them building there. I can just about bet you would be OK any other church building there, money or not. If these people did all of their own funding, would you still feel that they should not have the "right" to build there?
I never said that's why I am against them building it there. I am against it because I think it is hugely insensitive to those that died, the survivors and their families, and America in general to build an Islamic cultural center, and mosque in such close proximity to the worst act of terrorism ever, perpetrated by followers of radical Islam. Sorry, but it's just a fact that a church, or synagogue wouldn't be an insult to their memories.
I never said that's why I am against them building it there. I am against it because I think it is hugely insensitive to those that died, the survivors and their families, and America in general to build an Islamic cultural center, and mosque in such close proximity to the worst act of terrorism ever, perpetrated by followers of radical Islam. Sorry, but it's just a fact that a church, or synagogue wouldn't be an insult to their memories.
I never said that's why I am against them building it there. I am against it because I think it is hugely insensitive to those that died, the survivors and their families, and America in general to build an Islamic cultural center, and mosque in such close proximity to the worst act of terrorism ever, perpetrated by followers of radical Islam. Sorry, but it's just a fact that a church, or synagogue wouldn't be an insult to their memories.
:awe:Ah...but remember...it's the Jews' fault that they attacked.
![]()
(I still think Mossad was behind it!)![]()
IF this mosque was being built on the grounds of the WTT, I could understand the anger...but it's not...it's being built two blocks away. Is ALL of Manhattan now too sacred to permit the building of a mosque?
Here is the truth of the matter. They have a legal right, no question. A constitutional right, no question. But the truth is if they truly loved this country, sympathized with their fellow citizens, and were truly disgusted with the act perpetrated there, they wouldn't build there. They wouldn't do it.