Obama inherited a fiscal disaster. Now what?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

nealh

Diamond Member
Nov 21, 1999
7,078
1
0
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
I knew things were in the shitter economically, but I don't think the average American understands exactly HOW bad things really are. For example, did you know that your per capita share of America's total obligations, including entitlements, is more than $184,000 each? Holy debt-loads Batman, that's about 1/2 million bucks for the average American family. How does that feel?

Did you know that Team Bush borrowed $1 Trillion form the Social Security "trust" fund?

WTF did he spend that on?

Anyway, read on, some interesting stuff, especially with regards to the possibility that our AAA credit rating might be dinged as soon as 2012 as a result of this fiscal melt-down.

Obama inherited a fiscal disaster. Now what?
Without swift action, gargantuan debts could soon destroy Uncle Sam's credit rating.


WASHINGTON - Few Americans have any idea how bad the financial problems are that President Obama inherited from the Bush administration. Never mind the housing bubble, the bank meltdown, or the bailout scandals ? I am talking about the failure of federal government to honestly account either for its own actions or for America's most important programs: Medicare, Social Security, and Medicaid.

George W. Bush took office after three years of budget surpluses under President Bill Clinton. Eight years later, Obama walked into the Oval Office to find ? gift-wrapped with a bow, as he recently joked ? almost $11 trillion in Treasury debt, and deficits of more than $1 trillion a year for the foreseeable future. That's a $30,000 burden on every man, woman, and child in America, on top of the taxes they are already paying. Under better management, that number could have been zero.

If this weren't bad enough, President Bush's financial legacy is marred by other fundamental problems. Bush's team borrowed more than $1 trillion from the Social Security "trust fund" and seemed to spend it on everything except Social Security. Like Blanche DuBois in Tennessee Williams's "Streetcar Named Desire," Social Security now depends on the kindness of strangers ? namely, future taxpayers and foreign lenders.

Worse, the Bush administration refused to tell the public about the extraordinary underfunding or overpromising of our major entitlement programs. According to an audited Treasury report, Medicare is $34 trillion in the hole and Social Security is another $13 trillion. We don't even know how to measure Medicaid's problems, but some estimates put the shortfall around $30 trillion. To put this in perspective, the entire fiscal gap for America is at least four times as great as our total annual gross domestic product.

The US Treasury's Financial Report of the US Government is the key document for understanding these problems because it is the only place where Uncle Sam uses real accounting and audited numbers, just as every major company, charity, or state or local government is required to do by law. It is released every Dec. 15, and is available on the Treasury website. Until now, you have probably never heard of the Financial Report.

To its credit, the Obama White House has added a link to the Financial Report on its website, a step the Bush administration never took. The report will tell you that the per capita share of America's total obligations, including entitlements, is more than $184,000 each. The typical American family's share is roughly half a million dollars.

The truth hurts. But the real news is that the 2008 fiscal gap was more than $3 trillion and worsening fast due to our entitlement problems. Hardly any reporter covered this story. And this was before the cost of economic recovery or shoring up our financial system. Including these costs, the 2009 fiscal gap could approach $5 trillion.

Whether due to tradition, inertia, or ignorance, Uncle Sam refuses to weigh himself on an honest scale. It's a decision with serious consequences.

Two leading credit rating agencies on Wall Street, Standard & Poor's and Moody's, projected ? while Bush was still president ? that the US Treasury bond could lose its AAA rating as soon as 2012. If we allow this projection to come true, the US will have plummeted from the prospect of being debt-free to destroying its credit rating in only eight years.

Standard & Poor's was unusually specific in its projection. It said that the US could have the same credit rating as Estonia or Greece by 2015, Poland or Mexico by 2020, and Panama by 2025. Panama's debt is below investment grade; it's junk. How can the greatest nation in the world be reduced to such comparisons? The answer is eight years of financial mismanagement.

The first rule of holes is to stop digging. President Bush not only failed to stop digging, he used a power shovel. The giant task of the Obama administration will be to build a tall enough ladder to help us climb out. This is a job that will take many years ? perhaps decades.

The construction project starts Feb. 23, when Obama is expected to host a fiscal responsibility summit at the White House. His first challenge will be to explain the massive scope of the problem; next, he will have to convince Americans that he wants to preserve and strengthen the social safety net, not weaken it, as naysayers claim. Finally, Republicans and Democrats will have to agree to share some sacrifice. Nothing is off-limits: taxes and spending must both be on the table.

I have proposed forming a bipartisan fiscal reform commission that would hold public meetings around the country and then propose a framework for tax and entitlement reform. The chief virtue of the commission approach is that it starts the clock: If Congress, or the White House, has another solution, it will be considered alongside the commission's proposal.

What matters is that we solve these problems, which grow worse every day. All good-faith ideas must be welcomed.

http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0218/p09s02-coop.html

I am average or a bit below. I understood completely what would happen when the Dems gave housing loans to the people who couldn't afford the properties befor they increased in value. There are a few of us talk about this very thing threw the years. We all looked so sweet in our tinfoiled hats. But hay . You good ahead and sugar coat all ya want .


Just so YOU get a more clear understanding let me explain . How banking works . Short form


Yets say that just from 2001. Only 200 billion dollars was given to the banks from the fed . In exchange for US treasury bonds.

Now We know it was alot more than 200 billion . But 200 billion should give you a true scope of the real problem .

200 billion from the Fed to the banks. With that 200 billion the Banks can leverage

200x 90 = 18,000 billion in loans. Its a fact. Ya see the problem is even tho their is 18,000 billion in loans . That amount of cash was never used . Instead the Banks Leveaged it up. But only 200 billion in cash is all their ever was.

Now if 25% were bad loans thats 4,500 billion in bad loans .

The part that pisses me off is We lost 4.5 trillion bollars . and the real lose is in fact only 50 billion. That fact alone should raise all kinds of red flags . This is exactly what happened But the loses are way way bigger than 4.5 trillion. Also the Bonds were only issue at 200 billion . Thats what our government owes real money + interest. But we the people are Stuck with 4.5 trillion in loses. I want to be a banker. This is criminal conduct.

Every person involved from the lawmakers up that allowed this kind of thing should be in prison . If their to powerful to be brought to justice . Than they are also to dangerious to be in America. I believe these are the true terrorist . In an honest trial . With Honest people involved I could prove it in a court of LAW.

How about the average joe who bought what they could not afford or understand....lay the blame everywhere to be fair
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: alchemize
Hi DM :)

How do you explain the last two budgets? Link to where democrat senators filibustered previous 6 years budgets?

I'm sure I could find many statements by D's saying spending increases were "cuts" - thus whining about not spending MORE. Hell, I'm sure if we looked, DM and other libs here were likely parroting those same things...
 

Pocatello

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 1999
9,754
2
76
Until people realize that both the Democrats and the Republicans are robbing us blind, nothing will ever change. They're the same, except for the names. The Republicans said they are against the bill, yet are happy to spend the money coming their way.
 

alchemize

Lifer
Mar 24, 2000
11,486
0
0
Originally posted by: Pocatello
Until people realize that both the Democrats and the Republicans are robbing us blind, nothing will ever change. They're the same, except for the names. The Republicans said they are against the bill, yet are happy to spend the money coming their way.
Of course, What matters is not that the money is spent, but what it is spent on :)

Different cuts of the pig, but it's still Pork. Republicans rewarded their base, now dems are doing the same, and it appears they are trying to make up for lost time!
 

charrison

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
17,033
1
81
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: Pocatello
Until people realize that both the Democrats and the Republicans are robbing us blind, nothing will ever change. They're the same, except for the names. The Republicans said they are against the bill, yet are happy to spend the money coming their way.
Of course, What matters is not that the money is spent, but what it is spent on :)

Different cuts of the pig, but it's still Pork. Republicans rewarded their base, now dems are doing the same, and it appears they are trying to make up for lost time!

Yes if he keeps the spending up, we can rename this latest spending bill the republican reelection act of 2008. People know that at a divided govt will at least slow the spending down.
 

mozirry

Senior member
Sep 18, 2006
760
1
0
we need to sell our nuclear technology to gov'ts who can pay for it, like Iran haha
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
Not trying to change subject. I would like to expand it .

We all know what happened on 9/11/01. But what about 9/11/91 or 9/11/ 81 ect . ect. ect.


For instance on 9/11/91

This occurred.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc7i0wCFf8g


Now listen to Bush here. Who is this we. He speaks of. Right there is grounds for conspirecy against the People of the United States. For its a matter of Sovern power. By his own words he is a traitor. But what was Done ? NOTHING.

The Second part to pay attention to is His statement of the founding fathers of the UN and there Vision of the future.

Forgive my spelling . I can't list them all . Just the ones I can remember. This is old stuff for me.

Noel Field
Harry Dexter White

Lawrence Duggan

Solomon Alder

Virginius Frank Coe

Alger Hiss

William H Taylor.

Do yourselves a favor and find out who and what these men stood for. See your world more clearly.

 

alphatarget1

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2001
5,710
0
76
Maybe it's time to cut back on entitlements.

Would a brand new 47 year old president want to risk his political future to do what's right for the country? I think not.
 

miketheidiot

Lifer
Sep 3, 2004
11,060
1
0
Originally posted by: MotF Bane
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Thanks Bush for increasing the national debt by $4 trillion in your 8 years as President.

The American people spoke in 2006, and again in 2008, about who they want controlling their tax dollars.

Hint: it's not the GOP.

Hint: they want less spending. Not another wasted $787 billion.

hint: the guy that wanted to spend alot of money won pretty convincingly.
 

shiner

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
17,112
1
0
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Not trying to change subject. I would like to expand it .

We all know what happened on 9/11/01. But what about 9/11/91 or 9/11/ 81 ect . ect. ect.


For instance on 9/11/91

This occurred.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc7i0wCFf8g


Now listen to Bush here. Who is this we. He speaks of. Right there is grounds for conspirecy against the People of the United States. For its a matter of Sovern power. By his own words he is a traitor. But what was Done ? NOTHING.

The Second part to pay attention to is His statement of the founding fathers of the UN and there Vision of the future.

Forgive my spelling . I can't list them all . Just the ones I can remember. This is old stuff for me.

Noel Field
Harry Dexter White

Lawrence Duggan

Solomon Alder

Virginius Frank Coe

Alger Hiss

William H Taylor.

Do yourselves a favor and find out who and what these men stood for. See your world more clearly.

Your fruitcake is showing....
 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Not trying to change subject. I would like to expand it .

We all know what happened on 9/11/01. But what about 9/11/91 or 9/11/ 81 ect . ect. ect.


For instance on 9/11/91

This occurred.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc7i0wCFf8g


Now listen to Bush here. Who is this we. He speaks of. Right there is grounds for conspirecy against the People of the United States. For its a matter of Sovern power. By his own words he is a traitor. But what was Done ? NOTHING.

The Second part to pay attention to is His statement of the founding fathers of the UN and there Vision of the future.

Forgive my spelling . I can't list them all . Just the ones I can remember. This is old stuff for me.

Noel Field
Harry Dexter White

Lawrence Duggan

Solomon Alder

Virginius Frank Coe

Alger Hiss

William H Taylor.

Do yourselves a favor and find out who and what these men stood for. See your world more clearly.
You do understand that those "thousand points of light" don't actually exist?

Euphemisms, metaphors, and political rhetoric seem to pass right over the collective heads of conspiracy theorists though. That's why most people look at them cross-eyed.
 

miketheidiot

Lifer
Sep 3, 2004
11,060
1
0
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Maybe it's time to cut back on entitlements.

Would a brand new 47 year old president want to risk his political future to do what's right for the country? I think not.

the right thing to do is massively raise taxes.


*not going to happen
 

Jmman

Diamond Member
Dec 17, 1999
5,302
0
76
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Maybe it's time to cut back on entitlements.

Would a brand new 47 year old president want to risk his political future to do what's right for the country? I think not.

the right thing to do is massively raise taxes if you want to destroy the economy.


*not going to happen

fixed.......
 

Jiggz

Diamond Member
Mar 10, 2001
4,329
0
76
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: Ocguy31
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Did you know that Team Bush borrowed $1 Trillion form the Social Security "trust" fund?



My buddy told me about this and he thought it was one of the greatest heists in all of mankind.. lol.. Said they stole from the future..

Said IT CAN NEVER EVER EVER BE PAID BACK

but all those stupid religious senior citizens jumped up and voted for him like HE was the messiah.. gonna save them from TEH GAYZ... while ROBBING THEM BLIND

and loling all the way home

Do those stupid senior citizens know how to use punctuation and grammar?

What next, you become a spelling nazi or repost nazi? Why are you such a little bitch sometimes?? Reply to topics and information or just stfu

I hit a soft spot, huh?

I was simply pointing out that calling others stupid while typing like a deranged 16 year old is quite funny. Sorry to offend.


You didn't offend me at all... I was pissed because you took a very serious topic and completely dismissed it because you didn't like the punctuation or found a way to make a stupid fucking joke when your president stole $1,000,000,000,000 from Americans .. not even counting his fucked up stimulus plans right before he left office.

Huh? With less than a month in office, BHO broke all his campaign promises is not FU?
 

Jiggz

Diamond Member
Mar 10, 2001
4,329
0
76
Originally posted by: nealh
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Thanks Bush for increasing the national debt by $4 trillion in your 8 years as President.

The American people spoke in 2006, and again in 2008, about who they want controlling their tax dollars.

Hint: it's not the GOP.


Oh yeah..the Dems who have built a stimulus package lead by garbage with no real fixes...and where are the 3 million jobs coming from..pure BS

Didn't he said 4M jobs will be created? And then reduced to 3.5M upon approval of the bill at the House level and today 3M after it became a law! And finally, those 3M jobs are either created or saved? Are you following the semantics here? So basically if the job loses continue and in the end only 3M Americans are gainfully employed, the Stimulus Bill still worked! Because it saved those last 3M employed Americans! What a crack of sh@t!

Where this country is leading to is not hard to figure out! Just look West and you'll see! Three Blue States struggling and begging for $$$, and yet will not cut stupid social programs. You know why? For the next election . . .
 

Jiggz

Diamond Member
Mar 10, 2001
4,329
0
76
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Maybe it's time to cut back on entitlements.

Would a brand new 47 year old president want to risk his political future to do what's right for the country? I think not.

the right thing to do is massively raise taxes. Libs don't pay taxes anyway!


*not going to happen

fixed . . .
 

Mxylplyx

Diamond Member
Mar 21, 2007
4,197
101
106
While I'm no fan of Bush, saying that he squandered an opportunity to pay off our entire national debt is just stupid. Assuming the budget surpluses that existed during the height of the dot com bubble would go on forever is just as stupid as the people that thought house values would continue to rise forever. Also, those budget surpluses only existed because they were still raiding SS.
 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Not trying to change subject. I would like to expand it .

We all know what happened on 9/11/01. But what about 9/11/91 or 9/11/ 81 ect . ect. ect.


For instance on 9/11/91

This occurred.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc7i0wCFf8g


Now listen to Bush here. Who is this we. He speaks of. Right there is grounds for conspirecy against the People of the United States. For its a matter of Sovern power. By his own words he is a traitor. But what was Done ? NOTHING.

The Second part to pay attention to is His statement of the founding fathers of the UN and there Vision of the future.

Forgive my spelling . I can't list them all . Just the ones I can remember. This is old stuff for me.

Noel Field
Harry Dexter White

Lawrence Duggan

Solomon Alder

Virginius Frank Coe

Alger Hiss

William H Taylor.

Do yourselves a favor and find out who and what these men stood for. See your world more clearly.

Your fruitcake is showing....

Did you research any of those names. If you didn't your a foolish person. If you did I am not saying I am not a fruit cake. But it could be fairly said that . the potis calling the kettle black here. Everone of us has a special talent. Some relized and some not.

I discovered mine when i was about 10. Flow. I i have deep understanding of it. By association If I become interested in something. I have to understand it from the source. Once I know the source I can follow the path of list resistance. Now If something simple has a restriction . I find that flaw. I know its there so I find it. PC was way late in my life.
Racing the only thing I enjoyed Doing . But my passion has always been history and why 2+2=)0). After the internet come to me the info . was overwhelming. I had already read books very few have ever even seen . But this was way beyond that . Its pretty easy to find the trueth in the lies . So to is it easy to spot the lies in the trueth.

The news we get now. Even tho its modern fast . And all/ Its nothing close to the more true reporting of the 70's The 60's was scare the shit out of people time. It was Also when JFK warned us about whats happening write before our eyes.

I already know my end unless I am lucky enough to escape it first. But I don't know what any other people are going to do. All except one I recently met . I believe He comes out of this. Along with millions more. But I have only met one person besides myself that will say NO. I don't count . Because my ass better be gone by than. He left for Russia .

 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: Nemesis 1
Not trying to change subject. I would like to expand it .

We all know what happened on 9/11/01. But what about 9/11/91 or 9/11/ 81 ect . ect. ect.


For instance on 9/11/91

This occurred.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc7i0wCFf8g


Now listen to Bush here. Who is this we. He speaks of. Right there is grounds for conspirecy against the People of the United States. For its a matter of Sovern power. By his own words he is a traitor. But what was Done ? NOTHING.

The Second part to pay attention to is His statement of the founding fathers of the UN and there Vision of the future.

Forgive my spelling . I can't list them all . Just the ones I can remember. This is old stuff for me.

Noel Field
Harry Dexter White

Lawrence Duggan

Solomon Alder

Virginius Frank Coe

Alger Hiss

William H Taylor.

Do yourselves a favor and find out who and what these men stood for. See your world more clearly.
You do understand that those "thousand points of light" don't actually exist?

Euphemisms, metaphors, and political rhetoric seem to pass right over the collective heads of conspiracy theorists though. That's why most people look at them cross-eyed.


Ya good one.Being fallacious on the points taken . From my perspective is misdirection by yourself. That may or may not be the case . But in appearance in consideration of the points. It does give transparency to your statement.

 

Nemesis 1

Lifer
Dec 30, 2006
11,366
2
0





Lets Start with this gentleman. Who BUSH A republican gives so much merit.

Birth, education, and career
Born in 1907 in Richmond, Virginia, he attended public schools in Tennessee, Alabama, and Chicago. He attended the University of Chicago, earning his bachelor of philosophy in 1926 and continuing graduate work into 1928. From 1928 to 1930, he was a member of the staff of the Johns Hopkins University Institute of Law, returning to the University of Chicago as a research assistant and to write his thesis from 1930-33. From 1933 to 1934, he was a member of the staff of the Brookings Institution. In the summer of 1934, he was a consultant in the Office of the Secretary of the Treasury Department; in the summer of 1936 and spring-summer 1939, he was again a consultant at the Treasury. From the autumn of 1934 until the spring of 1939, he taught economics at the University of Toronto, remaining a member of its staff on leave for several years thereafter (in his testimony, Coe says "4, 5, or 6 years"). Beginning in 1939, he worked adviser to Paul McNutt, then head of the Federal Security Agency, and in 1940 as assistant to Leon Henderson in the Office of Price Administration (then known as the National Defense Council).


Delegates assemble after the opening of the Bretton Woods Conference; the front left is possibly Coe.Late in 1940, he returned to the Treasury Department as an assistant director of monetary research, where he stayed for about a year, during which he was special assistant to the United States Ambassador in England. In 1942, he became Executive Secretary of the Joint War Production Committee of the United States and Canada and an assistant to the Executive Director of the Board of Economic Warfare (later renamed the Foreign Economic Administration). In late 1944/early 1945, Coe was named Director of the Division of Monetary Research in the Treasury Department, serving as technical secretary at the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference at Bretton Woods, New Hampshire in 1944, he accepted a position as Secretary of the International Monetary Fund in 1946, his successor at Treasury being Harold Glasser.[3]

Coe resigned from the Fund in December 1952 after public calls were made by Congress for his ouster.[4] The IMF announced his resignation on December 3, 1952.[5]


[edit] Allegations and evidence of espionage
The evidence against Coe stems from his being named by two defected spies and ex post examinations of his career.

In 1939, former Communist underground courier Whittaker Chambers named Coe to then-Assistant Secretary of State Adolf Berle as a communist sympathizer who was providing information to the Ware group.[6][4]

In 1948, former NKVD courier Elizabeth Bentley, testifying before the House Un-American Activities Committee, mentioned Coe, whom she remembered as one of several important Treasury officials who passed on information to Silvermaster.[7] [8]

Called before the HUAC (chaired by Congressman Karl Mundt), Coe denied under oath having ever been a member of the CPUSA. Subsequently, he was questioned intensely in the IMF about his activities, but he was not sanctioned or removed from his duties.[9] In late 1952, he was called before a Grand Jury in New York (presided over by Senator Herbert O'Conor) and then before the McCarran Committee on December 1, 1952, both of which were investigating alleged Communist affiliations of U.S. citizens working for the United Nations and other international organizations. On the latter occasion, he declined to answer the question whether he was a member of the Comunist Party on Fifth Amendment grounds, citing the example of Alger Hiss's conviction for perjury.

His final appearance before McCarthy's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI) came on June 5 and 8, 1953, chaired by then Senator Karl Mundt.

Nominally, the investigation was into interference with negotiations to devalue the Austrian schilling in November 1949 as the Soviets had apparently been profiting from the black market. U.S. officials with the European Cooperation Administration (the Marshall Plan aid agency) reported that a command came via a ticker-tape telecon to break off negotiations at the last minute. The telecon, which was with an anonymous person at the State Department, cited Coe in his capacity as Secretary of the IMF as the source of the order. (In truth, the devaluation had been discussed by and was supported by the Executive Board of the IMF.)

The PSI ascertained that Coe could not have been the source of the communication as he was in the Middle East at the time,[10] and quickly turned to investigating Coe's alleged Communist activities. Coe, who consulted constantly with his lawyer Milton S. Friedman, maintained his fifth-amendment plea, stating at one point that he did not want to see the blacklist extended to include those who had helped him in his search for work.[11]

The subequent report of the Senate Sub-Committee on Internal Security stated: "Coe refused to answer, on the grounds that the answers might incriminate him, all questions as to whether he was a Communist, whether he was engaged in subversive activities, or whether he was presently a member of a Soviet espionage ring. He refused for the same reason to answer whether he was a member of an espionage ring while Technical Secretary of the Bretton Woods Conference, whether he ever had had access to confidential Government information or security information, whether he had been associated with the Institute of Pacific Relations, or with individuals named on a long list of people associated with that organization."[12]

Regarding his policy actions, it is often mentioned that Coe, together with Treasury Secretary Harry Dexter White, opposed President Franklin Roosevelt's gold loan program of $200 million to help the Nationalist Chinese Government stabilize its currency in 1943. However, White's documents indicate while he favored giving economic assistance, he had concerns that cash assistance might be misused or fall into enemy hands.[13]

Arlington Hall cryptographers identified the Soviet agent designated "Peak" in the VENONA as "possibly" Coe, but there is no clear reason for the identification (one secondary sources suggests it was because there was no additional information on Peak).[14] The decrypt in question reports that five reels of Peak's documents concerning U.S.-British Lend-Lease negotiations were en route to Moscow.[15]

A recent investigation into the KGB archives claims that files show Coe to have been a Soviet agent.[16] However, the authors do not quote or reproduce the documents in question, and at least one scholar argues that their testimony should be suspended until the primary sources become available.[17
 

nullzero

Senior member
Jan 15, 2005
670
0
0
Obama is totally clueless with how to fix the economy. He is listening to a bunch of lobbyist and clueless people from his staff on how to fix the economy. Obama has taken over control of the titanic... A ice berg as already collided into the hull its just a matter of time before it is all underwater. Does not matter which way Obama steers the ship its going to end up with the same fate.
 

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Fiscal disaster? Yeah, I have an idea on how to fix that... lets F'n sign a 787BILLION dollar pork bill... That'll help our fiscal "disaster" situation.

BTW, the SS "trust fund" doesn't exist and the money is always "borrowed" from it and put in the general fund. The SS "trust fund" doesn't actually ever hold money anymore.

Um, if you look into why the Great Depression happened, a main reason was because the government at the time decided to do nothing and just ride it out. It took a new president, FDR, to try a stimulus package, but by that point it was like trying to revive a nearly dead horse. It eventually required WW2 to fully recover the economy.

Thank GOD you are not in political power, CAD! If you were, it would take WW3 to get us out of this mess!
 

zephyrprime

Diamond Member
Feb 18, 2001
7,512
2
81
With our monetary system, default is the only answer. Default at both the government and personal levels. Hiking taxes to pay down debt won't work. Doing so will only caused soul crushing deflation.
 

nullzero

Senior member
Jan 15, 2005
670
0
0
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Fiscal disaster? Yeah, I have an idea on how to fix that... lets F'n sign a 787BILLION dollar pork bill... That'll help our fiscal "disaster" situation.

BTW, the SS "trust fund" doesn't exist and the money is always "borrowed" from it and put in the general fund. The SS "trust fund" doesn't actually ever hold money anymore.

Um, if you look into why the Great Depression happened, a main reason was because the government at the time decided to do nothing and just ride it out. It took a new president, FDR, to try a stimulus package, but by that point it was like trying to revive a nearly dead horse. It eventually required WW2 to fully recover the economy.

Thank GOD you are not in political power, CAD! If you were, it would take WW3 to get us out of this mess!

SlickBeast,

Government intervention usually never fixes the problems. Especially in today's world where the U.S. is already saddled with trillions of dollars of debt. You simply will get nowhere with issuing more debt to try to revive a economy with a debt overload. The U.S. is a drug addict with debt... the problem is Obama and the government is trying to give the drug addict a O.D. of debt to fix the situation lol.
 

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
Originally posted by: nullzero
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: CADsortaGUY
Fiscal disaster? Yeah, I have an idea on how to fix that... lets F'n sign a 787BILLION dollar pork bill... That'll help our fiscal "disaster" situation.

BTW, the SS "trust fund" doesn't exist and the money is always "borrowed" from it and put in the general fund. The SS "trust fund" doesn't actually ever hold money anymore.

Um, if you look into why the Great Depression happened, a main reason was because the government at the time decided to do nothing and just ride it out. It took a new president, FDR, to try a stimulus package, but by that point it was like trying to revive a nearly dead horse. It eventually required WW2 to fully recover the economy.

Thank GOD you are not in political power, CAD! If you were, it would take WW3 to get us out of this mess!

SlickBeast,

Government intervention usually never fixes the problems. Especially in today's world where the U.S. is already saddled with trillions of dollars of debt. You simply will get nowhere with issuing more debt to try to revive a economy with a debt overload. The U.S. is a drug addict with debt... the problem is Obama and the government is trying to give the drug addict a O.D. of debt to fix the situation lol.

Here in Canada in the early 90's we too had massive debt, but then along came a brilliant finance minister in our government, and within 5 years or so, the government was balancing its books and they had created over 100,000 jobs (that would be the equivalent of 1 million jobs created in the US).

Economic stimulus does work, and is historically proven. Short-sighted Conservatives would rather waste the money on something war-related. I can't believe Republicans are bitching about $700 million when Bush blew over a trillion dollars on Iraq. At least the $700 million will build some infrastructure.

Also, here in Canada none of our banks have failed. None. We are the only G8 nation that can claim this. It is a result of government intervention - good rules by which the banks must abide.