Originally posted by: RY62
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: rchiu
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: rchiu
Originally posted by: Dari
If Obama increases his delegate lead after Tuesday, how on earth can he look at his supporters and say he'll take the VP slot? Unacceptable. Hillary is better for VP. She can go to funerals and bake cookies.
Unacceptable because this ticket is gonna kick Repub's butt big time? This is a good chance for Obama to make up for his only weakness, the experience argument, and become a strong candidate 4/8 years down the road. It will be great if Democrats can broker something so if the Hillary/Obama got elected into the office, Obama can do stuff like brokering peace in the middle east, renegotiate NFTA...etc.
There is no point for Hillary to be a VP. She doesn't need more experience and Democrats have nothing to gain having her as a VP candidate. With Hillary/Obama ticket, Democrats could lock up the presidential post for the next 16 years.
Hillary does not have any more experience than Obama does. She's just a sequel like Bush Jr was in 2000. And this doesn't help Obama or the Dems (anymore than the Bush II presidency helped the Pubs), because you're not voting for the party, you're voting for a last name.
Heh, yeah sure. I guess Hillary going around the world since early 90's, including war torn area like Bosnia, speak for women's right in China, visiting refugee camps, speaking to high level leaders around the world don't count as experience. If living oversea counts as experience like Obama claimed, I'd have more foreign policy experience then either one of them. Hillary served in the Senate for 8 years, vs Obama's first term. She was coming out with Healthcare initiative, children's health insurance program and adoption and safe families act back in the 90's. You people can talk all you want, but the fact is Hillary has much more high level experience then Obama in Foreign policy, healthcare, family, trade and many other issue.
She made a speech in China and that counts as experience?
Going around the world? That's dumb. Pigeons can fly from Paris to New York-non-stop. Visiting refugee camps? Lawdy lawd, Hillaree helllp us.
Face it, her experience is not profound enough to matter.
LOL @U Obamabots. One day your complaining about her ex-president husband and that people are only voting for the name then the next day your trying to claim she has no experience.
I'm sure she didn't know pick up any experience in her 8 YEARS IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
Geesh!!
If you see that as her experience, it certainly isn't 35 years of experience (which means she'll have to have started earning her experience points right after college). And making speeches is what she criticizes for and yet claim it for herself? She talks about solutions but all I see in the things you mention is nothing but form over function. Are you impressed with her experience?
I'm 200% more impressed with Hillary's experience then I am Obama's.
Bottom line, I'd stand in line to vote for a Hillary/Obama ticket but I might not even bother to go out to vote for an Obama/XYZ ticket.
Says a lot about a man that prefers a woman who wouldn't be where she is today without her man and likes to claim her husband's credit as her own. Not everyone is privilege to have a powerful significant-otherfamily they can use to gain power. Some people (Obama included) have to work hard and earn everything they get in life.
Seems to me B.O. only got where he is because of another powerful woman. Without Oprah we wouldn't even know his name today.
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: SSSnail
So could your mom, see how that works?Originally posted by: Dari
The point went straight over your head. Hillary could've been a 25 cents a blow prostitute, but if she marries the President that changes everything? She didn't earn the right to represent America like all the hard-working Americans working in government.
Mods, I didn't mean that as a call out, just using that for argument's sake.
And your Obotsma remind me of the SAME crowd that supported Bush. Wait, you ARE the same crowd.
I don't understand your first statement in regards to the argument. No doubt my statement hurt your feelings though.
Originally posted by: SSSnail
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: SSSnail
So could your mom, see how that works?Originally posted by: Dari
The point went straight over your head. Hillary could've been a 25 cents a blow prostitute, but if she marries the President that changes everything? She didn't earn the right to represent America like all the hard-working Americans working in government.
Mods, I didn't mean that as a call out, just using that for argument's sake.
And your Obotsma remind me of the SAME crowd that supported Bush. Wait, you ARE the same crowd.
I don't understand your first statement in regards to the argument. No doubt my statement hurt your feelings though.
There you go again with your idiotic sentiments. I'm not wasting my time with you.
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: rchiu
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: rchiu
Originally posted by: Dari
If Obama increases his delegate lead after Tuesday, how on earth can he look at his supporters and say he'll take the VP slot? Unacceptable. Hillary is better for VP. She can go to funerals and bake cookies.
Unacceptable because this ticket is gonna kick Repub's butt big time? This is a good chance for Obama to make up for his only weakness, the experience argument, and become a strong candidate 4/8 years down the road. It will be great if Democrats can broker something so if the Hillary/Obama got elected into the office, Obama can do stuff like brokering peace in the middle east, renegotiate NFTA...etc.
There is no point for Hillary to be a VP. She doesn't need more experience and Democrats have nothing to gain having her as a VP candidate. With Hillary/Obama ticket, Democrats could lock up the presidential post for the next 16 years.
Hillary does not have any more experience than Obama does. She's just a sequel like Bush Jr was in 2000. And this doesn't help Obama or the Dems (anymore than the Bush II presidency helped the Pubs), because you're not voting for the party, you're voting for a last name.
Heh, yeah sure. I guess Hillary going around the world since early 90's, including war torn area like Bosnia, speak for women's right in China, visiting refugee camps, speaking to high level leaders around the world don't count as experience. If living oversea counts as experience like Obama claimed, I'd have more foreign policy experience then either one of them. Hillary served in the Senate for 8 years, vs Obama's first term. She was coming out with Healthcare initiative, children's health insurance program and adoption and safe families act back in the 90's. You people can talk all you want, but the fact is Hillary has much more high level experience then Obama in Foreign policy, healthcare, family, trade and many other issue.
She made a speech in China and that counts as experience?
Going around the world? That's dumb. Pigeons can fly from Paris to New York-non-stop. Visiting refugee camps? Lawdy lawd, Hillaree helllp us.
Face it, her experience is not profound enough to matter.
LOL @U Obamabots. One day your complaining about her ex-president husband and that people are only voting for the name then the next day your trying to claim she has no experience.
I'm sure she didn't know pick up any experience in her 8 YEARS IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
Geesh!!
If you see that as her experience, it certainly isn't 35 years of experience (which means she'll have to have started earning her experience points right after college). And making speeches is what she criticizes for and yet claim it for herself? She talks about solutions but all I see in the things you mention is nothing but form over function. Are you impressed with her experience?
I'm 200% more impressed with Hillary's experience then I am Obama's.
Bottom line, I'd stand in line to vote for a Hillary/Obama ticket but I might not even bother to go out to vote for an Obama/XYZ ticket.
Says a lot about a man that prefers a woman who wouldn't be where she is today without her man and likes to claim her husband's credit as her own. Not everyone is privilege to have a powerful significant-otherfamily they can use to gain power. Some people (Obama included) have to work hard and earn everything they get in life.
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: rchiu
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: rchiu
Originally posted by: Dari
If Obama increases his delegate lead after Tuesday, how on earth can he look at his supporters and say he'll take the VP slot? Unacceptable. Hillary is better for VP. She can go to funerals and bake cookies.
Unacceptable because this ticket is gonna kick Repub's butt big time? This is a good chance for Obama to make up for his only weakness, the experience argument, and become a strong candidate 4/8 years down the road. It will be great if Democrats can broker something so if the Hillary/Obama got elected into the office, Obama can do stuff like brokering peace in the middle east, renegotiate NFTA...etc.
There is no point for Hillary to be a VP. She doesn't need more experience and Democrats have nothing to gain having her as a VP candidate. With Hillary/Obama ticket, Democrats could lock up the presidential post for the next 16 years.
Hillary does not have any more experience than Obama does. She's just a sequel like Bush Jr was in 2000. And this doesn't help Obama or the Dems (anymore than the Bush II presidency helped the Pubs), because you're not voting for the party, you're voting for a last name.
Heh, yeah sure. I guess Hillary going around the world since early 90's, including war torn area like Bosnia, speak for women's right in China, visiting refugee camps, speaking to high level leaders around the world don't count as experience. If living oversea counts as experience like Obama claimed, I'd have more foreign policy experience then either one of them. Hillary served in the Senate for 8 years, vs Obama's first term. She was coming out with Healthcare initiative, children's health insurance program and adoption and safe families act back in the 90's. You people can talk all you want, but the fact is Hillary has much more high level experience then Obama in Foreign policy, healthcare, family, trade and many other issue.
She made a speech in China and that counts as experience?
Going around the world? That's dumb. Pigeons can fly from Paris to New York-non-stop. Visiting refugee camps? Lawdy lawd, Hillaree helllp us.
Face it, her experience is not profound enough to matter.
LOL @U Obamabots. One day your complaining about her ex-president husband and that people are only voting for the name then the next day your trying to claim she has no experience.
I'm sure she didn't know pick up any experience in her 8 YEARS IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
Geesh!!
If you see that as her experience, it certainly isn't 35 years of experience (which means she'll have to have started earning her experience points right after college). And making speeches is what she criticizes for and yet claim it for herself? She talks about solutions but all I see in the things you mention is nothing but form over function. Are you impressed with her experience?
I'm 200% more impressed with Hillary's experience then I am Obama's.
Bottom line, I'd stand in line to vote for a Hillary/Obama ticket but I might not even bother to go out to vote for an Obama/XYZ ticket.
Says a lot about a man that prefers a woman who wouldn't be where she is today without her man and likes to claim her husband's credit as her own. Not everyone is privilege to have a powerful significant-otherfamily they can use to gain power. Some people (Obama included) have to work hard and earn everything they get in life.
Says a lot about a man that is against a woman because of who she's married to.
I would have no problem supporting Obama if I believed he had the right stuff for the job, but I think he's still too green. I also believe that a Hillary/Obama ticket would unite the whole country and that's the most important factor to me.
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: senseamp
Obama is a community organizer, an empty suit, the political version of a used car salesman. When is the last time anyone cared about what a community organizer has to say? Why should Obama be any different. He knows the inspirational BS to say, so he says it, but there is no there there.
Now THIS is hate. So far from the truth it can't be anything but.
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: Dari
The point went straight over your head. Hillary could've been a 25 cents a blow prostitute, but if she marries the President that changes everything? She didn't earn the right to represent America like all the hard-working Americans working in government.
She'll earn it by winning.
She can't do that either. She could win every primary from here to August and she still cannot possibly win the nomination through popular vote.
I didn't know it was a popular vote contest. It's a delegate contest.
Originally posted by: SSSnail
So could your mom, see how that works?Originally posted by: Dari
The point went straight over your head. Hillary could've been a 25 cents a blow prostitute, but if she marries the President that changes everything? She didn't earn the right to represent America like all the hard-working Americans working in government.
Mods, I didn't mean that as a call out, just using that for argument's sake.
And your Obotsma remind me of the SAME crowd that supported Bush. Wait, you ARE the same crowd.
Originally posted by: Dari
There is no way Hillary/Obama would unite the nation.
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Hilarious. Democrats are going to give Republicans the White House. Again.
Morons.
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Hilarious. Democrats are going to give Republicans the White House. Again.
Morons.
Yeah, I can't beleive people are stupid enopugh to vote for Obama, he's obviously still wet behind the ears.
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Hilarious. Democrats are going to give Republicans the White House. Again.
Morons.
Yeah, I can't beleive people are stupid enopugh to vote for Obama, he's obviously still wet behind the ears.
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Hilarious. Democrats are going to give Republicans the White House. Again.
Morons.
Yeah, I can't beleive people are stupid enopugh to vote for Obama, he's obviously still wet behind the ears.
I'm sorry, who's the faction doing the "hating?"
:roll:
Originally posted by: loki8481
it's going to come down to the super delegates, and I think both Obama and Hillary will have good cases to make for themselves; a lot of it is going to depend on PA, though.
Originally posted by: SSSnail
Who's labeling? Who's throwing around insults like a two bit punks? Who's hatred so blind that they hate everything about a person, even her smile? WHO?
Match me the degree of hatred that you see for Oblahma from Hillary supporters, go on.
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
Originally posted by: loki8481
it's going to come down to the super delegates, and I think both Obama and Hillary will have good cases to make for themselves; a lot of it is going to depend on PA, though.
What is Hillary's case? She's not winning this election. She will not have the majority of delegates behind her when the DNC rolls around. IF she wins, it'll be a heist via super delegates which would piss off 1/2 the Democratic Party.
Originally posted by: loki8481
Hillbama might be the one thing that could unify the party and prevent one side from walking away from the convention feeling pissed off and slighted.
it'll never happen... it'd make far too much sense and work far too well in furthering the dem's goals of actually winning.
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
Originally posted by: loki8481
it's going to come down to the super delegates, and I think both Obama and Hillary will have good cases to make for themselves; a lot of it is going to depend on PA, though.
What is Hillary's case?
Originally posted by: SSSnail
Who's labeling? Who's throwing around insults like a two bit punks? Who's hatred so blind that they hate everything about a person, even her smile? WHO?
Match me the degree of hatred that you see for Oblahma from Hillary supporters, go on.
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: 1EZduzit
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Hilarious. Democrats are going to give Republicans the White House. Again.
Morons.
Yeah, I can't beleive people are stupid enopugh to vote for Obama, he's obviously still wet behind the ears.
I'm sorry, who's the faction doing the "hating?"
:roll:
Both of course, with one side a bit more virulent in their dislike of the other side's candidate. Do I need to post the thousand hate filled rants from dozens of posters against Hillary the evil satanic bitch?