Obama administration officials can't guarantee middle-class Americans won't see tax hike

[IndyColtsFan]

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Originally posted by: blanghorst

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Can't answer the question? Or won't?? 😛

Just keep the circle jerk of declaring yourselves "victorious" going if it make you fell better. Oh, and keep that checkbook ready so you can pay more in taxes..... someday. Soon I hope.

You implied Obama did not continue some of Bush's more controversial policies. We provided proof that in fact, he has continued some of those policies. Instead of saying "Oh, I didn't realize that," you try to divert the discussion to non-related topics.

As I said, if you would like to discuss those particular topics, create another thread. Otherwise, you asked for links and were given the links. That is the extent of my obligation to you.

I know about Gitmo. Now how many of these suspected terrorists are you willing to move into your home, city, area, state?

Point to where I said Obama was wrong by continuing this policy. I NEVER said he was wrong, which you are failing to grasp. Let me spell it out ONE MORE TIME:

1. You asked for links proving that Obama continued some of Bush's more controversial policies.
2. I provided the link.

It doesn't matter whether you or I agree or disagree with either Bush or Obama. You asked for proof. I gave that to you. That is all I am obligated to provide to you.

If you can't answer that question or give a reasonble plan of what to do with these people that Obama INHERITED from Bush then it's nothing but political hackery to use this as "proof" of anything.

He was the one who pledged to close Gitmo. Guess he should have thought about the consequences first.

It's a problem, they are working on it. Some of them should probably NEVER be released, but I'm sure Obama will release them just to make you happy, so how many shall I sign you up for? 🙂

Ouch....please post a link to a post where I implore Obama to release those guys. Let me save you the trouble -- you can't, because I don't support releasing them.

 

[Stuxnet]

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Originally posted by: blanghorst

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Can't answer the question? Or won't?? 😛

Just keep the circle jerk of declaring yourselves "victorious" going if it make you fell better. Oh, and keep that checkbook ready so you can pay more in taxes..... someday. Soon I hope.

You implied Obama did not continue some of Bush's more controversial policies. We provided proof that in fact, he has continued some of those policies. Instead of saying "Oh, I didn't realize that," you try to divert the discussion to non-related topics.

As I said, if you would like to discuss those particular topics, create another thread. Otherwise, you asked for links and were given the links. That is the extent of my obligation to you.

I know about Gitmo. Now how many of these suspected terrorists are you willing to move into your home, city, area, state?

Last attempt, then I give up on trying to help you... see if you can follow:

1. No one said Obama's decision on Gitmo was right or wrong.

2. No one said Obama's decision on Gitmo was right or wrong because it is a separate issue from what was discussed, which was:

3. whether or not Obama has continued the policies of Bush that many AT'ers (and the general public) have declared as failures.

4. You wanted someone to substantiate the assertion that Obama was continuing policies that have been declared as failures.

5. Examples such as Gitmo, Iraq, warrantless wiretapping, etc., have all been provided as examples.

TEST

1. What is the difference between asserting that the decision to close Gitmo was right/wrong, and asserting that Obama is/isn't continuing Bush policies that were previously deemed as failures?

Answer:

 

[nobodyknows]

Originally posted by: spacejamz

Originally posted by: blanghorst

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Originally posted by: spacejamz

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

News flash for you, our current President is NOTHING like the last one.

that's funny...how many threads have we had here about issues that the liberals here were complaining about when GW was president, but now that Obama has decided to continue those exact same policies, the liberals are now okay with it?

Change we can believe in...

Got link?

Here is one of the most recent examples:

Oh oh

Nobodyknows, has your amensia wore off yet or is your head still stuck in the sand to not see how Obama is keeping GW's 'tradition's alive and well???

You know, the ones that the libbys were jumpin up and down demanding impeachment for, but now are suddenly okay with them??

So how many of these suspected terrorists are you willing to take into your home?

You better sday at least a dozen or you just a phoney partisian hack.

 

[theeedude]

Originally posted by: Skoorb
One payer healthcare, taxes, warrantless wiretapping, closing gitmo, pulling troops out quickly, it seems either the circumstances have changed an awful damn lot, or Obama was either lying or ignorant.

Don't you people want more than endless mediocrity? Why do you continue to defend it? Is this really the best the US can do and if so do you want to say you were ok with it?

With populace as stupid as ours, yes it is the best we can do, and yes I am OK with it if the alternative is grandpa+bimbo.

 

[IndyColtsFan]

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

So how many of these suspected terrorists are you willing to take into your home?

You better sday at least a dozen or you just a phoney partisian hack.

Where does he say that he supports releasing them? He DOES NOT. He actually doesn't say who he agrees with and until you know that, you can't keep using this ridiculous argument because IT ISN'T THE TOPIC UNDER DISCUSSION.

 

[Stuxnet]

At this point I think nobodyknows is just trying to hijack the thread. No one is this stupid. Seriously. Or we're all on Candid Camera.

 

[nobodyknows]

Originally posted by: jbourne77

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Originally posted by: blanghorst

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Can't answer the question? Or won't?? 😛

Just keep the circle jerk of declaring yourselves "victorious" going if it make you fell better. Oh, and keep that checkbook ready so you can pay more in taxes..... someday. Soon I hope.

You implied Obama did not continue some of Bush's more controversial policies. We provided proof that in fact, he has continued some of those policies. Instead of saying "Oh, I didn't realize that," you try to divert the discussion to non-related topics.

As I said, if you would like to discuss those particular topics, create another thread. Otherwise, you asked for links and were given the links. That is the extent of my obligation to you.

I know about Gitmo. Now how many of these suspected terrorists are you willing to move into your home, city, area, state?

Last attempt, then I give up on trying to help you... see if you can follow:

1. No one said Obama's decision on Gitmo was right or wrong.

2. No one said Obama's decision on Gitmo was right or wrong because it is a separate issue from what was discussed, which was:

3. whether or not Obama has continued the policies of Bush that many AT'ers (and the general public) have declared as failures.

4. You wanted someone to substantiate the assertion that Obama was continuing policies that have been declared as failures.

5. Examples such as Gitmo, Iraq, warrantless wiretapping, etc., have all been provided as examples.

TEST

1. What is the difference between asserting that the decision to close Gitmo was right/wrong, and asserting that Obama is/isn't continuing Bush policies that were previously deemed as failures?

Answer:

Obama is in a tough spot on this one, but after Bush fucked the dog on this issue for YEARS to expect Obama to have it cleaned up and handled in less then a years shows what a hack you are.

This proves NOTHING yet. If he still has them in prison come his next election cycle then this should be an issue. Otherwise, give hoim more time.

I don't believe I have to stop and expalin something so simple to you hacks. Just because two or three of you decide to agree with each other only proves you're having a circle jerk. Nothing more.

 

[nobodyknows]

Originally posted by: blanghorst

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

So how many of these suspected terrorists are you willing to take into your home?

You better sday at least a dozen or you just a phoney partisian hack.

Where does he say that he supports releasing them? He DOES NOT. He actually doesn't say who he agrees with and until you know that, you can't keep using this ridiculous argument because IT ISN'T THE TOPIC UNDER DISCUSSION.

I WASN'T ADDRESSING YOU SO KINDLY SHUT THE FUCK UP

 

[nobodyknows]

Originally posted by: blanghorst


Ouch....please post a link to a post where I implore Obama to release those guys. Let me save you the trouble -- you can't, because I don't support releasing them.

No shit? You only support making political hay out of the fact they aren't released yet? Gee, I didn't know that.

God, I can't beleive the dumbasses on this forum

 

[Stuxnet]

Originally posted by: nobodyknows
I don't believe I have to stop and expalin something so simple to you hacks. Just because two or three of you decide to agree with each other only proves you're having a circle jerk. Nothing more.

So you don't know the difference. Check :thumbsup:

The only hack around here is you. Try reading your posts again. Who's toeing the party line? Who's issuing double standards?

(hint: it's you)

 

[IndyColtsFan]

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Originally posted by: jbourne77

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Originally posted by: blanghorst

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Can't answer the question? Or won't?? 😛

Just keep the circle jerk of declaring yourselves "victorious" going if it make you fell better. Oh, and keep that checkbook ready so you can pay more in taxes..... someday. Soon I hope.

You implied Obama did not continue some of Bush's more controversial policies. We provided proof that in fact, he has continued some of those policies. Instead of saying "Oh, I didn't realize that," you try to divert the discussion to non-related topics.

As I said, if you would like to discuss those particular topics, create another thread. Otherwise, you asked for links and were given the links. That is the extent of my obligation to you.

I know about Gitmo. Now how many of these suspected terrorists are you willing to move into your home, city, area, state?

Last attempt, then I give up on trying to help you... see if you can follow:

1. No one said Obama's decision on Gitmo was right or wrong.

2. No one said Obama's decision on Gitmo was right or wrong because it is a separate issue from what was discussed, which was:

3. whether or not Obama has continued the policies of Bush that many AT'ers (and the general public) have declared as failures.

4. You wanted someone to substantiate the assertion that Obama was continuing policies that have been declared as failures.

5. Examples such as Gitmo, Iraq, warrantless wiretapping, etc., have all been provided as examples.

TEST

1. What is the difference between asserting that the decision to close Gitmo was right/wrong, and asserting that Obama is/isn't continuing Bush policies that were previously deemed as failures?

Answer:

Obama is in a tough spot on this one, but after Bush fucked the dog on this issue for YEARS to expect Obama to have it cleaned up and handled in less then a years shows what a hack you are.

It proves he is continuing a Bush policy, which is what you wanted links for.

I don't believe I have to stop and expalin something so simple to you hacks. Just because two or three of you decide to agree with each other only proves you're having a circle jerk. Nothing more.

You must be in high school or something. You were the one that asked for links showing he is continuing Bush's policies. You were given links (and information dealing with other policies as well). You were given other information. You continue ignoring it and diverting attention from the core argument:

Question: Did Obama continue some of Bush's controversial policies? (YOUR question)
Answer: Yes with evidence linked.

/thread

 

[IndyColtsFan]

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Originally posted by: blanghorst

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

So how many of these suspected terrorists are you willing to take into your home?

You better sday at least a dozen or you just a phoney partisian hack.

Where does he say that he supports releasing them? He DOES NOT. He actually doesn't say who he agrees with and until you know that, you can't keep using this ridiculous argument because IT ISN'T THE TOPIC UNDER DISCUSSION.

I WASN'T ADDRESSING YOU SO KINDLY SHUT THE FUCK UP

I will speak when I please, thanks anyway.

 

[nobodyknows]

Originally posted by: blanghorst

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Originally posted by: blanghorst

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

So how many of these suspected terrorists are you willing to take into your home?

You better sday at least a dozen or you just a phoney partisian hack.

Where does he say that he supports releasing them? He DOES NOT. He actually doesn't say who he agrees with and until you know that, you can't keep using this ridiculous argument because IT ISN'T THE TOPIC UNDER DISCUSSION.

I WASN'T ADDRESSING YOU SO KINDLY SHUT THE FUCK UP

I will speak when I please, thanks anyway.

Well then FUCK FACE, if your going to answer a question I asked someone else, don't fucking snip out the part of the quote that shows it was addressed to someone else or I will jump down your throat AGAIN!!!!!!!!

 

[Stuxnet]

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Originally posted by: blanghorst

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Originally posted by: blanghorst

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

So how many of these suspected terrorists are you willing to take into your home?

You better sday at least a dozen or you just a phoney partisian hack.

Where does he say that he supports releasing them? He DOES NOT. He actually doesn't say who he agrees with and until you know that, you can't keep using this ridiculous argument because IT ISN'T THE TOPIC UNDER DISCUSSION.

I WASN'T ADDRESSING YOU SO KINDLY SHUT THE FUCK UP

I will speak when I please, thanks anyway.

Well then FUCK FACE, if your going to answer a question I asked someone else, don't fucking snip out the part of the quote that shows it was asked of someone else or I will jump down your throat AGAIN!!!!!!!!

Someone's off their meds...

<-- Ritalin
Lithium -->

Please help yourself to both.

 

[nobodyknows]

Originally posted by: blanghorst

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Originally posted by: jbourne77

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Originally posted by: blanghorst

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Can't answer the question? Or won't?? 😛

Just keep the circle jerk of declaring yourselves "victorious" going if it make you fell better. Oh, and keep that checkbook ready so you can pay more in taxes..... someday. Soon I hope.

You implied Obama did not continue some of Bush's more controversial policies. We provided proof that in fact, he has continued some of those policies. Instead of saying "Oh, I didn't realize that," you try to divert the discussion to non-related topics.

As I said, if you would like to discuss those particular topics, create another thread. Otherwise, you asked for links and were given the links. That is the extent of my obligation to you.

I know about Gitmo. Now how many of these suspected terrorists are you willing to move into your home, city, area, state?

Last attempt, then I give up on trying to help you... see if you can follow:

1. No one said Obama's decision on Gitmo was right or wrong.

2. No one said Obama's decision on Gitmo was right or wrong because it is a separate issue from what was discussed, which was:

3. whether or not Obama has continued the policies of Bush that many AT'ers (and the general public) have declared as failures.

4. You wanted someone to substantiate the assertion that Obama was continuing policies that have been declared as failures.

5. Examples such as Gitmo, Iraq, warrantless wiretapping, etc., have all been provided as examples.

TEST

1. What is the difference between asserting that the decision to close Gitmo was right/wrong, and asserting that Obama is/isn't continuing Bush policies that were previously deemed as failures?

Answer:

Obama is in a tough spot on this one, but after Bush fucked the dog on this issue for YEARS to expect Obama to have it cleaned up and handled in less then a years shows what a hack you are.

It proves he is continuing a Bush policy, which is what you wanted links for.

I don't believe I have to stop and expalin something so simple to you hacks. Just because two or three of you decide to agree with each other only proves you're having a circle jerk. Nothing more.

You must be in high school or something. You were the one that asked for links showing he is continuing Bush's policies. You were given links (and information dealing with other policies as well). You were given other information. You continue ignoring it and diverting attention from the core argument:

Question: Did Obama continue some of Bush's controversial policies? (YOUR question)
Answer: Yes with evidence linked.

/thread

LOL at your anal need to think your better/smarter then someone. Are you just reaching puberty?

 

[IndyColtsFan]

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Originally posted by: blanghorst


Ouch....please post a link to a post where I implore Obama to release those guys. Let me save you the trouble -- you can't, because I don't support releasing them.

No shit? You only support making political hay out of the fact they aren't released yet? Gee, I didn't know that.

God, I can't beleive the dumbasses on this forum

You are an uneducated, ignorant troll of monumental proportions. Seriously, are you in high school?

I am NOT making ANY statement on Obama's decision to keep them imprisoned. I happen to AGREE with him on it, you idiot. Can you not UNDERSTAND this simple concept????

You wanted proof Obama continued some of Bush's controversial policies. I PROVIDED that evidence. I did not say Obama was wrong on them. I said simply "This is an example." You cannot dispute this, debate it, or make excuses. This policy (and several others you are ignoring) were continued.

The fact that you are so dense that you can't accept the fact that your questions was answered exactly as phrased shows you are nothing but an immature little hack that is bent on defending Obama regardless of what he says or does.

 

[Patranus]

Originally posted by: blanghorst
Where does he say that he supports releasing them? He DOES NOT. He actually doesn't say who he agrees with and until you know that, you can't keep using this ridiculous argument because IT ISN'T THE TOPIC UNDER DISCUSSION.

So what exactly is accomplished by closing GITMO? Why spend $90,000,000.00 $100,000,000.00 or whatever it is going to cost to simply move these prisoners to another prison?

Why? Simply to say that he closed GITMO while continuing the same policies to appease the San Francisco liberal....and Obama can't even accomplish this.

Just continuing the same old shit. Obama has to be held to the standard that HE SET and that HE RAN FOR PRESIDENT ON.

 

[nobodyknows]

Originally posted by: jbourne77

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Originally posted by: blanghorst

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Originally posted by: blanghorst

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

So how many of these suspected terrorists are you willing to take into your home?

You better sday at least a dozen or you just a phoney partisian hack.

Where does he say that he supports releasing them? He DOES NOT. He actually doesn't say who he agrees with and until you know that, you can't keep using this ridiculous argument because IT ISN'T THE TOPIC UNDER DISCUSSION.

I WASN'T ADDRESSING YOU SO KINDLY SHUT THE FUCK UP

I will speak when I please, thanks anyway.

Well then FUCK FACE, if your going to answer a question I asked someone else, don't fucking snip out the part of the quote that shows it was asked of someone else or I will jump down your throat AGAIN!!!!!!!!

Someone's off their meds...

<-- Ritalin
Lithium -->

Please help yourself to both.

LOL how often do you feel the need to jerk off in a 24 hour period? :laugh:

I'm guess often.

 

[IndyColtsFan]

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Originally posted by: blanghorst

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Originally posted by: blanghorst

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

So how many of these suspected terrorists are you willing to take into your home?

You better sday at least a dozen or you just a phoney partisian hack.

Where does he say that he supports releasing them? He DOES NOT. He actually doesn't say who he agrees with and until you know that, you can't keep using this ridiculous argument because IT ISN'T THE TOPIC UNDER DISCUSSION.

I WASN'T ADDRESSING YOU SO KINDLY SHUT THE FUCK UP

I will speak when I please, thanks anyway.

Well then FUCK FACE, if your going to answer a question I asked someone else, don't fucking snip out the part of the quote that shows it was addressed to someone else or I will jump down your throat AGAIN!!!!!!!!

The mods have requested that we keep quotes down to a minimum, which I was doing. People can scroll back to the original post to note the full contents.

 

[nobodyknows]

Originally posted by: blanghorst

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Originally posted by: blanghorst


Ouch....please post a link to a post where I implore Obama to release those guys. Let me save you the trouble -- you can't, because I don't support releasing them.

No shit? You only support making political hay out of the fact they aren't released yet? Gee, I didn't know that.

God, I can't beleive the dumbasses on this forum

You are an uneducated, ignorant troll of monumental proportions. Seriously, are you in high school?

I am NOT making ANY statement on Obama's decision to keep them imprisoned. I happen to AGREE with him on it, you idiot. Can you not UNDERSTAND this simple concept????

You wanted proof Obama continued some of Bush's controversial policies. I PROVIDED that evidence. I did not say Obama was wrong on them. I said simply "This is an example." You cannot dispute this, debate it, or make excuses. This policy (and several others you are ignoring) were continued.

The fact that you are so dense that you can't accept the fact that your questions was answered exactly as phrased shows you are nothing but an immature little hack that is bent on defending Obama regardless of what he says or does.

Originally posted by: blanghorst


I will speak when I please, thanks anyway.

 

[Stuxnet]

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Originally posted by: blanghorst
Question: Did Obama continue some of Bush's controversial policies? (YOUR question)
Answer: Yes with evidence linked.

/thread

LOL at your anal need to think your better/smarter then someone. Are you just reaching puberty?

LOL at your inability to admit you were proven flat wrong. It's ok to admit you were wrong, you know. Us big boys do it all the time.

 

[nobodyknows]

Originally posted by: blanghorst

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Originally posted by: blanghorst

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Originally posted by: blanghorst

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

So how many of these suspected terrorists are you willing to take into your home?

You better sday at least a dozen or you just a phoney partisian hack.

Where does he say that he supports releasing them? He DOES NOT. He actually doesn't say who he agrees with and until you know that, you can't keep using this ridiculous argument because IT ISN'T THE TOPIC UNDER DISCUSSION.

I WASN'T ADDRESSING YOU SO KINDLY SHUT THE FUCK UP

I will speak when I please, thanks anyway.

Well then FUCK FACE, if your going to answer a question I asked someone else, don't fucking snip out the part of the quote that shows it was addressed to someone else or I will jump down your throat AGAIN!!!!!!!!

The mods have requested that we keep quotes down to a minimum, which I was doing. People can scroll back to the original post to note the full contents.

But ypu didn't honor that request in this very post?

Face it, you just want to argue and you have yoy butt fucking buddy (who thinks he's jason borne) to help you.

 

[Stuxnet]

Originally posted by: nobodyknows
LOL how often do you feel the need to jerk off in a 24 hour period? :laugh:

I'm guess often.

Your mom's wiping the last shot off her chest as we speak... why don't you ask her 😉

(just responding in kind 🙂 )

 

[nobodyknows]

Originally posted by: jbourne77

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Originally posted by: blanghorst
Question: Did Obama continue some of Bush's controversial policies? (YOUR question)
Answer: Yes with evidence linked.

/thread

LOL at your anal need to think your better/smarter then someone. Are you just reaching puberty?

LOL at your inability to admit you were proven flat wrong. It's ok to admit you were wrong, you know. Us big boys do it all the time.

LOL@U I know some two-peckered billygoats that have more sense then you

 

[nobodyknows]

Originally posted by: jbourne77

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Originally posted by: jbourne77

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Originally posted by: blanghorst

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

Originally posted by: blanghorst

Originally posted by: nobodyknows

So how many of these suspected terrorists are you willing to take into your home?

You better sday at least a dozen or you just a phoney partisian hack.

Where does he say that he supports releasing them? He DOES NOT. He actually doesn't say who he agrees with and until you know that, you can't keep using this ridiculous argument because IT ISN'T THE TOPIC UNDER DISCUSSION.

I WASN'T ADDRESSING YOU SO KINDLY SHUT THE FUCK UP

I will speak when I please, thanks anyway.

Well then FUCK FACE, if your going to answer a question I asked someone else, don't fucking snip out the part of the quote that shows it was asked of someone else or I will jump down your throat AGAIN!!!!!!!!

Someone's off their meds...

<-- Ritalin
Lithium -->

Please help yourself to both.

LOL how often do you feel the need to jerk off in a 24 hour period? :laugh:

I'm guess often.

Your mom's wiping the last shot off her chest as we speak... why don't you ask her 😉

(just responding in kind 🙂 )

My mom's dead, thats so much for bringing her into this you fucking low life piece of pond scum.