- May 7, 2005
- 5,161
- 32
- 86
Originally posted by: biostud
Now I'm definately wait buying until r520 is released.
Originally posted by: ddogg
woah this truly looks like a monster of a card. ATI could be in some serious trouble considering the fact they are already 3 - 4 months late.
Originally posted by: jim1976
Originally posted by: ddogg
woah this truly looks like a monster of a card. ATI could be in some serious trouble considering the fact they are already 3 - 4 months late.
Or you can see it the other way? Nvidia knows what R520 is capable of and rushing to release something when it will be released?
We can play this game for days , why not just wait some more time and see?![]()
Originally posted by: jim1976
Originally posted by: ddogg
woah this truly looks like a monster of a card. ATI could be in some serious trouble considering the fact they are already 3 - 4 months late.
Or you can see it the other way? Nvidia knows what R520 is capable of and rushing to release something when it will be released?
We can play this game for days , why not just wait some more time and see?![]()
Originally posted by: trinibwoy
"But it was achieved using new and improved two-slot cooling, not water or phase-change cooling.
Are they retarded? A top end SKU with almost 2x the clock of the next card down on the same process?
Originally posted by: ddogg
Originally posted by: trinibwoy
"But it was achieved using new and improved two-slot cooling, not water or phase-change cooling.
Are they retarded? A top end SKU with almost 2x the clock of the next card down on the same process?
hmm ya....it could be another one of theinquirer's misguided information but it does seem exciting.
We have learned that several boards achieved a clock speed of 800MHz
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: ddogg
Originally posted by: trinibwoy
"But it was achieved using new and improved two-slot cooling, not water or phase-change cooling.
Are they retarded? A top end SKU with almost 2x the clock of the next card down on the same process?
hmm ya....it could be another one of theinquirer's misguided information but it does seem exciting.
is this what everyone's excited about?:
We have learned that several boards achieved a clock speed of 800MHz
several boards?
:roll:
there might be a "UltraExtremeO/C" {press edition} with an official clock of 800Mhz just to keep the performance crown. But most of us wont have the bucks for it.
ME?: i'm dropping out of this ridiculously expensive PC graphics "game".
:thumbsdown:
Originally posted by: grooblext
If they are dual slot, that will mean they can't be put into an SLI config right?
I wonder how it will compare in price / performance to a 7800GTX SLI setup.
Originally posted by: trinibwoy
Originally posted by: grooblext
If they are dual slot, that will mean they can't be put into an SLI config right?
I wonder how it will compare in price / performance to a 7800GTX SLI setup.
6800 Ultras are dual-slot.
Originally posted by: Drayvn
Originally posted by: trinibwoy
Originally posted by: grooblext
If they are dual slot, that will mean they can't be put into an SLI config right?
I wonder how it will compare in price / performance to a 7800GTX SLI setup.
6800 Ultras are dual-slot.
If they bring out a 7800U Dual like the dual 6600GT
Do you think it will have to be like quadruple slot cooling solution or do you think theyll just say "ahh f**k it its gonna cost them 1500 to buy might as well add another 1000 for phase cooling..."?
![]()
