Powermoloch
Lifer
oh boy 😕 another wallet buster !
-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
Nvidia new weapon G71.
Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Here's the google cache of the site linked from the article:
http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:06...2445+nvidia+g71&hl=en&client=firefox-a
http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:06...2445+nvidia+g71&hl=en&client=firefox-a
Cookie Monster
Diamond Member
800mhz.... generally, clock speed as INQ suggest would mean core clock speeds,,,
but then.. 800 is like over kill.
but then.. 800 is like over kill.
Soccerman06
Diamond Member
First off, the Inquier is always wrong.
Second, http://anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2472&p=3 shows that you cant OC the 7800GTX past 475mhz.
Third, if the article is talking about the RAM, isnt the theoretical limit on GDDR3 800mhz? That would meen someone/company had to create GDDR3 that could run at the max theoretical limit.
Second, http://anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2472&p=3 shows that you cant OC the 7800GTX past 475mhz.
Third, if the article is talking about the RAM, isnt the theoretical limit on GDDR3 800mhz? That would meen someone/company had to create GDDR3 that could run at the max theoretical limit.
Cookie Monster
Diamond Member
Samsung is already mass producing 1.2ns GDDR3 rams clocked up to 1.66ghz, and could be used on the ultra version.
They said tweaking the core to be a bit more efficent then again they could be wrong, but simply a 7800GTX can reachbetween 470~530 on core speeds, according to many sites and ocers using stock cooling.
They said tweaking the core to be a bit more efficent then again they could be wrong, but simply a 7800GTX can reachbetween 470~530 on core speeds, according to many sites and ocers using stock cooling.
Soccerman06
Diamond Member
Really? What video card uses 1.66ghz GDDR3
and I ment 1.6ghz 🙂
(\__/) ()
(='.'=) = (.' )
(")_(") (") )o
im still workin on the side view
Cookie Monster
Diamond Member
...the 7800GTX missed the 1.2ns so, i guess the new coming ones from maybe ATi and Nvidia will use them on the high end cards.
Suspicious-Teach8788
Lifer
If they could clock 800 so easily, you could be OCing ur 7800 to insane speeds.... This might just be some exaggerated info from INQ (as usual)
imported_humey
Senior member
BTW, Asus did have a single slot 6800Ultra, but i be happier with dual slot on thse new card with rear exhaust outside case.
RussianSensation
Elite Member
ATI's original "official" date of release for R520 was July 26th. 7800GTX came out June 21st. This means they are not officially late yet. Also, not even 1 month has passed since nV's release.
Keysplayr
Elite Member
I have said this a dozen times and I know you must have read it, but the time it takes from tape out to store shelves averages 120 days (4 months). Now, I don't see how they can push it faster, but if they can how much sooner do you think it could possibly be? 90 days? 75 days? I don't think this is something that can be rushed, but I don't know what "breakthroughs" have been made in the speed of tape out to wafer production to packaging. So I think about 3 months is a fair optomistic guess giving the benefit of the doubt that the news of the tape out was somehow a whole month after the fact.
Keysplayr
Elite Member
No, I am not in the semiconductor biz. But interested in it enough to read many chock full o facts articles about what is involved. From the design on the table, to the actual wafer production. It really is mind blowing all the resources and time this stuff takes. That's why when some people say "Why can't ATI just whip it out?" I just shake my head. It's not that simple. It is a TONNNNN of procedures and a few more tons of QA (Quality Assurance) control on top of it all which is necessary.
obeseotron
Golden Member
Why shouldn't nVidia and ATI make $700 or even $1000 cards? AMD and Intel sell $1000 CPUs that are a lot cheaper to produce than graphics boards with GPUs bigger than those CPUs plus a ton of RAM and other stuff. Obviously they're not gonna sell too many, but leadership in the performance segment is a marketing thing as much as anything else. I would call the pricing of video cards much fairer than that of CPUs. A $150 CPU is often 75% as fast as a $1000 one, sometimes more. A pair of 7800GTXs is probably 4 times faster single 6600GT at high resolution, maybe more - think about the comparable CPU comparison. Anyone think a FX57 is 4 times as fast as a 3200+ at anything?
Crescent13
Diamond Member
NEVER TRUST ANYTHING FROM THE INQUIRER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
that is all.
that is all.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 24K
-
-
