well, coming from an x800pro owner:
sm3 was never about better IQ.... more effects perhaps, but quality is pretty comparable, it's more about efficiency of code and the 'cost' to do the effects.
agreed
and that's a load of crap.. out of dozoens of attempts, only 3 claimed successful, and all sapphire - which somehow doesn't make a lot of since as the mod is to the gpu, which should all be the same...
in general they overclock well however, and they should as they use the same gpu as the xt.
perhaps.. but it sure puts out the damn heat... and it rather depends on which model you're talking - ultra vs xt, pro vs gt..
true, but not necessarily (or at least not always) an advantage of one over the other..
a load of crap considering the (lack of) success rate atm...
since we really haven't seen sm3 performance, not sure where that comes from..
i think the x800pro is a very good card, i just think it's difficult to judge the just how good the nv40 is until it's available in the real world.. along with sm3 apps, overclocking, etc., and of course the xt isn't out yet either...
Not only are Shaders 3.0 not currently available but it is questionable whether there is significant increase in quality over shader 2.0... especially now.
sm3 was never about better IQ.... more effects perhaps, but quality is pretty comparable, it's more about efficiency of code and the 'cost' to do the effects.
Both x800 and 6800 flavors outperform the 9800xt and 5950 often times by 100%
agreed
x800 pro can be modded to x800xt pipeline/speeds.
and that's a load of crap.. out of dozoens of attempts, only 3 claimed successful, and all sapphire - which somehow doesn't make a lot of since as the mod is to the gpu, which should all be the same...
in general they overclock well however, and they should as they use the same gpu as the xt.
x800's don't have the same power demands as the 6800
perhaps.. but it sure puts out the damn heat... and it rather depends on which model you're talking - ultra vs xt, pro vs gt..
x800's dont take up as much room as 6800
true, but not necessarily (or at least not always) an advantage of one over the other..
considering the mod of x800pro, it's much more competitively priced
a load of crap considering the (lack of) success rate atm...
by the time ps3.0 is a needed (and by needed i mean, not having 3.0 is crippling to a card's performance and/or quality)
since we really haven't seen sm3 performance, not sure where that comes from..
Draw you're own conclusions, feel free to revise my list. It's a fact that both NVIDIA and ATI have powerful cards - no denying that whatever company you are loyal to. However, when considering the little things, from a personal standpoint I think ATI captured the big picture of an all-around good card with the x800.
i think the x800pro is a very good card, i just think it's difficult to judge the just how good the nv40 is until it's available in the real world.. along with sm3 apps, overclocking, etc., and of course the xt isn't out yet either...
