News NVIDIA and Intel to Develop AI Infrastructure and Personal Computing Products

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

regen1

Member
Aug 28, 2025
53
76
46
Few Jensen takeaways:
> mentioned something like a year or so of collaboration going on for this.
> Claims no change in ARM roadmaps.
Wants to reach whatever general computing platform that has market reach. Mentions Intel unquestionably having the largest enterprise, industrial, cloud, consumer footprint. Praises FOVEROS.
> With x86 platform they were using external PCIe retimers(scaling up to NVLink 8) whereas with ARM they were doing NVL72. Collab brings parity and thus more rack-scale on x86.

The scope of collab is still not fully clear, more clarity with time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marees and Josh128

Josh128

Golden Member
Oct 14, 2022
1,260
1,884
106
So I listened to the call. My takeaways (in no particular order).
  • AI! AI! AI!
  • They focused more on server CPUs than client GPUs.
  • They said Intel is selling server CPUs to Nvidia who will sell them to customers.
  • The deal has supposedly been in the works for nearly a year
  • If I heard him right, Lip-Bu Tan mentioned unified memory for the client SOCs which would imply it's a true iGPU.
  • Huang said this deal has no impact on Nvidia's ARM roadmap.
  • No announcement of Nvidia products being fabbed by Intel Foundry
  • No mention of what happens to Intel's graphics IP or datacenter AI accelerators.
  • When asked why the cash infusion into Intel, Huang said "It's a good investment".
Fantastic screen name and avatar by the way. 10/10
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 511 and Covfefe

fastandfurious6

Senior member
Jun 1, 2024
723
916
96
NVIntel Halo incoming

but how soon? all nvidia has is VERY FAT gpus, can they shrink them efficiently for APU/SOC mix with hot&hungry intel x86?

Tegra? lol!
 

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
16,758
7,207
136
All the high margin opportunities are on graphics/AI, not CPU.

AI is a dead opportunity really. You should pretty much expect even AMD to not get much. The Cloud Providers will roll their own, and that will be the main competitor to nVidia.
 

eek2121

Diamond Member
Aug 2, 2005
3,407
5,043
136
Kind of.
WoA is just dead on arrival.

As it has always been. For many years folks on this forum and elsewhere have been swearing ARM will overtake x86. I suspect many more years will pass at minimum. Many folks want cheap/efficient/fast/compatible. Not going to happen for quite a while. x86 will continue to offer a good balance for any serious workload.

I didn’t come here to talk about that, however. I came here to talk about this:


This is corporate speak for: “it’s dead, jim.”
 

poke01

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2022
4,097
5,423
106
WoA is dead cause of Microsoft, Qualcomm and various other things. There STILL not a single CPU on that platform that is worthy.
 

511

Diamond Member
Jul 12, 2024
4,249
3,876
106
this chart is what Intel suits won't show. They talked about Lunar Lake improved battery life but that was just in video playback which is performed by the very good media engines in Lunar. The actual CPU core IP is still dog crap.
The LP-E cores are perfectly fine though they handle everything on battery that is why LNL has so good Battery Life.
Wish test has been done on Linux instead of windows.
 

511

Diamond Member
Jul 12, 2024
4,249
3,876
106
I have seen Some AMD investor complaining that Intel getting so much Money is unfair 🤣🤣 and MLIDs tweet is pure gold.