DrMrLordX
Lifer
- Apr 27, 2000
- 22,932
- 13,015
- 136
Cablemod???(looking at you, corsair, cablemod, and MSI).
Cablemod???(looking at you, corsair, cablemod, and MSI).
Did you somehow miss that cablemod was starting numerous fires and issued a recall of their 12vhpwr adapters? And then they continued to cause fires even after the recall and their claim it was fixed.Cablemod???
Umm can't tell if you're joking or not . . . you aren't serious, are you? You think THEY caused those fires?Did you somehow miss that cablemod was starting numerous fires and issued a recall of their 12vhpwr adapters? And then they continued to cause fires even after the recall and their claim it was fixed.
This is an admission, don't you think? https://cablemod.com/adapterrecall/Umm can't tell if you're joking or not . . . you aren't serious, are you? You think THEY caused those fires?
No, it isn't. If it's an admission of anything, it's an admission of defeat: it isn't possible to make a "safe" 12VHPWR cable.This is an admission, don't you think? https://cablemod.com/adapterrecall/
It might be but then it would be Iron Man level of techit isn't possible to make a "safe" 12VHPWR cable.
Oh no! I said something bad about a company you like!No, it isn't. If it's an admission of anything, it's an admission of defeat: it isn't possible to make a "safe" 12VHPWR cable.
I know what you meant but... it's the weekend so nitpicking is allowed:No, it isn't. If it's an admission of anything, it's an admission of defeat: it isn't possible to make a "safe" 12VHPWR cable.
This recall [...] does not affect our angled cables.
I don't know if you intentionally didn't read the rest of the post. The 12Vhpwr/12v2x6 spec lacks details about how the pins and sockets are supposed to be designed, as well as lacking tolerance information.Umm can't tell if you're joking or not . . . you aren't serious, are you? You think THEY caused those fires?
That would be a substantial downgrade and should not be accepted. It doesn't have the Error Checking memory option in the Nvidia Control Panel and is thus not even an in the same product category by Nvidia's standards. I would demand a 4090 or a refund.Suppose my RTX 4090 Founder's Edition connector is to burn out any day now and the card is still under warranty, and I end up RMA'ing the card, and the manufacturer did nothave any more of the 4090's in stock, what would I most likely get back; a RTX 5080, RTX 5080 and some money, or a RTX 5090 (I doubt that because it's much more expensive than the 4090 even though it's in the same class)? I just worry that if I ever need to RMA the card and it can't be repaired, that I will get a lower class card in return due to the retail price of the 5090. Anyone here RMA a 4090 then got a 5080 in return?
I don't know if you intentionally didn't read the rest of the post. The 12Vhpwr/12v2x6 spec lacks details about how the pins and sockets are supposed to be designed, as well as lacking tolerance information.
This has led to multiple, fundamentally different pin and socket designs, some of them are much worse than others.
I called out these three brands because they are the most prevalent brands I've seen associated with these incidents. It's not strictly their fault, they didn't design the pins and sockets they are using.
You seem to have conflated my calling out that the data seems to overrepresent these brands as somehow they are solely responsible for the issue.
It all goes back to a bad spec, obviously, but to pretend like the issue just exists at the exact same rate for everyone and every brand is to ignore the nature of the problem.
It's sad that they have to resort to a temp sensor instead of being able to throttle current per pin. "It is what it is".ASROCK's solution but it requires their own PSUs, or those compatible with their protection mechanism.
It's just Nvidia giving a middle finger to their loyal zombies. Hey, if it melts, just get it repaired! You had the money to afford it in the first place. Don't be cheap!It's sad that they have to resort to a temp sensor instead of being able to throttle current per pin. "It is what it is".
Let's be fair: AMD doesn't seem to have any better implementations of 12v2x6 or 12VHPWR.It's just Nvidia giving a middle finger to their loyal zombies. Hey, if it melts, just get it repaired! You had the money to afford it in the first place. Don't be cheap!
Exactly. The problem is the 12v2x6 itself. It needs the power supplies to have over-current limit protection on each of the 6 lines to match the rating of the physical wires and connector...Let's be fair: AMD doesn't seem to have any better implementations of 12v2x6 or 12VHPWR.
Right, but if I recall correctly (based on one of der8auer's videos), there's no practical way for the PSU to do that alone. There needs to be changes on the cards.Exactly. The problem is the 12v2x6 itself. It needs the power supplies to have over-current limit protection on each of the 6 lines to match the rating of the physical wires and connector...
Conspiracy theory: Nvidia did that to make their FE cards look better than their AIB partner cards.This is on the card makers who wanted a new standard and then approved a bad design, bad cable quality and Nvidia drops their old better circuit design on their newer rtx cards (as Buildzoid pointed out months ago).
According to der8auer, the FE cards are more prone to burnout that some AIB cards (especially on the 5090).Conspiracy theory: Nvidia did that to make their FE cards look better than their AIB partner cards.