nt

[ThisIsMatt]

Originally posted by: tHa-ShIzNiT
I hate closed minded people like NightFlyerGTI.

I hate people who use the term closed minded.


I do think you're getting a little over reactive about the whole weed thing, though (and I probably think weed is just as lame as you do). As long as that isn't affecting you then you shouldn't bother with it. If he tells you stuff about it or complains about stuff that happens because of it (this case), then you should just tell him you don't want to hear about it or that it's his own fault.

 

[Whitecloak]

Originally posted by: ThisIsMatt

Originally posted by: tHa-ShIzNiT
I hate closed minded people like NightFlyerGTI.

I hate people who use the term closed minded.


I do think you're getting a little over reactive about the whole weed thing, though (and I probably think weed is just as lame as you do). As long as that isn't affecting you then you shouldn't bother with it. If he tells you stuff about it or complains about stuff that happens because of it (this case), then you should just tell him you don't want to hear about it or that it's his own fault.

 

[NuclearFusi0n]

Originally posted by: Amused
I'd get rid of him as soon as possible, not because I'm morally against smoking pot (I'm not), nor because I agree with our drug laws (I don't) but because of the legal ramifications.

What people here are failing to recognize is the way the police and courts treat drug cases. If he were to be caught with any significant amount of pot on him, the police can and more than likely will seize any and all possessions in his place of residence. It matters not who's possessions they are. It will then be up to NightFlyer to prove, through court, what possessions are his, and that he was not involved in the drugs. In short, because of our oppressive drug law enforcement, NightFlyer will be guilty until proven innocent... or more to the point, his property will.

I'll bet money a lot of the people getting on his case in this thread still live at home with their parents. Did you know if you were caught with a signifigant amount of drugs in your parent's house, the DA could have your parent's house, cars, bank accounts and all property seized? They can protest all they want, but they wont get a thing back until they get a lawyer and fight the seizure in court.

Let me reiterate that I am 100% opposed to the War on Drugs. But in the atmosphere that exists today, I would not allow a drug user to live with me. I have too much to lose and I'm not willing to take the time and money required to get it back.

I agree 100%.

 

[Gulzakar]

A former D.A.R.E student I take it?

All things considered, it could be worse. I don't know why your so worried about getting your room searched...unless you have some kiddie pron hidden under your bed, I don't think they are going to care about what you do.

 

[Kerouactivist]

I think it is a little silly that your so mad about this but, I understand your concern, just realize that as long if he doesn't have it in your room that it really doesn't matter. If you still can't get over it maybe you should think about changing roommates or suggest that he should move into a different room, and you will get a different roommate(if you can do that at your school, ussually you can). I think that would solve the problem on all ends and end a little bit of stress for each of you.

I am glad to see that you decided your not going to turn him in, which would make you a Narc/part of the hitler youth. IMO

 

[tcsenter]

Here's a scenario, since you've got a druggie for a roomy:

They find pot in your room. I guarantee you that he'll say he knows nothing about it, that's what all pot smokers do. I'm not saying he'll say its yours, but I'll bet you the farm that he'll deny deny deny that he knows anything about it, which of course implicates you. If it isn't his, then who the hell else could it belong to? There are only two of you. His denial is an implicit accusation against you.

So now you've got to defend yourself against something you have no part of. Get his slobbish gangsta-wannabe baggy clothes wearing reefer smoking 'I don't know how to pronounce a simple word like cool' ass thrown out if you have any chance at all.

Don't say nobody warned you.

 

[DeadHead]

Originally posted by: Amused
I'd get rid of him as soon as possible, not because I'm morally against smoking pot (I'm not), nor because I agree with our drug laws (I don't) but because of the legal ramifications.

What people here are failing to recognize is the way the police and courts treat drug cases. If he were to be caught with any significant amount of pot on him, the police can and more than likely will seize any and all possessions in his place of residence. It matters not who's possessions they are. It will then be up to NightFlyer to prove, through court, what possessions are his, and that he was not involved in the drugs. In short, because of our oppressive drug law enforcement, NightFlyer will be guilty until proven innocent... or more to the point, his property will.

I'll bet money a lot of the people getting on his case in this thread still live at home with their parents. Did you know if you were caught with a signifigant amount of drugs in your parent's house, the DA could have your parent's house, cars, bank accounts and all property seized? They can protest all they want, but they wont get a thing back until they get a lawyer and fight the seizure in court.

Let me reiterate that I am 100% opposed to the War on Drugs. But in the atmosphere that exists today, I would not allow a drug user to live with me. I have too much to lose and I'm not willing to take the time and money required to get it back.

To you and NuclearFusi0n1. The guy was caught with 2 roaches for 2 people and a rolling device. He is in college which mean he probably just moved from at least a few cities away. NightFlyerGTI is the one who came up with the assumtion they will search the room because the guy had to give his address. He is obviously not a dealer, and you need more then two roachs ( a LOT more) to have them consider siezing or even searching the residence. If they found a scale on him and other drugs, then you have to start worring. There is no way in hell they will sieze the entire dorm room full of stuff until they find out somehow this guy is at least a drug dealer. Its weed, the penelty shows its not a big crime to smoke it. Just remeber the thought of raiding came from the guy starting this thread.

 

[Amused]

Originally posted by: DeadHead

Originally posted by: Amused
I'd get rid of him as soon as possible, not because I'm morally against smoking pot (I'm not), nor because I agree with our drug laws (I don't) but because of the legal ramifications.

What people here are failing to recognize is the way the police and courts treat drug cases. If he were to be caught with any significant amount of pot on him, the police can and more than likely will seize any and all possessions in his place of residence. It matters not who's possessions they are. It will then be up to NightFlyer to prove, through court, what possessions are his, and that he was not involved in the drugs. In short, because of our oppressive drug law enforcement, NightFlyer will be guilty until proven innocent... or more to the point, his property will.

I'll bet money a lot of the people getting on his case in this thread still live at home with their parents. Did you know if you were caught with a signifigant amount of drugs in your parent's house, the DA could have your parent's house, cars, bank accounts and all property seized? They can protest all they want, but they wont get a thing back until they get a lawyer and fight the seizure in court.

Let me reiterate that I am 100% opposed to the War on Drugs. But in the atmosphere that exists today, I would not allow a drug user to live with me. I have too much to lose and I'm not willing to take the time and money required to get it back.

To you and NuclearFusi0n1. The guy was caught with 2 roaches for 2 people and a rolling device. He is in college which mean he probably just moved from at least a few cities away. NightFlyerGTI is the one who came up with the assumtion they will search the room because the guy had to give his address. He is obviously not a dealer, and you need more then two roachs ( a LOT more) to have them consider siezing or even searching the residence. If they found a scale on him and other drugs, then you have to start worring. There is no way in hell they will sieze the entire dorm room full of stuff until they find out somehow this guy is at least a drug dealer. Its weed, the penelty shows its not a big crime to smoke it. Just remeber the thought of raiding came from the guy starting this thread.

THIS time he had two roaches. What happens when he finds a really good deal on a couple of ounces? What happens if he's caught with his dealer in his car, and the cops assume the large quantity is his? Remember, cops now will assume you're a dealer even if you have less than a ounce on you, or if you have your weed in more than one baggy.

The point is, NightFlyer does not do drugs. He obviously does not know this guy, or what he is involved with. Why should NF take ANY risk for this guy's actions when he doesn't even do the drugs?

It's just not worth keeping the guy as a roomie. I'm not advocating ratting him out. Just changing roomies. Besides, the guy is a slob. I'd have booted him a long time before this simply for being a slob.

 

[ndee]

Originally posted by: NightFlyerGTI
HORROR STORY about weed :Q

He does weed? Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuhuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu. Come on, lighten up a bit, alcohol is the most time worse.

 

[DeadHead]

Your taking this waaaaaaaaaaaay to far. I'll admit there is a risk since he doesn't know the guy, but from what the story NF said its highly unlikly. I have known people who grow and people who just deal. The always have more then 2 joints on them. If someone calls them they don't want to go all the way back to their house/apt. If you got a good deal on a ounce, his roomate would smell it VERY quickly. This guy is obvisouly very opposed to weed, and so if a problem did arise where the cops would have to search (in itself is waaaaaaay unlikly) they would easly be able to see who smokes. The risks in giving the guy at least a chance are so small you can't even imagine. My opinion probably doesn't matter to him though since I am a "biased weed smoker." The guy would be happy to leave if you continue to call his actions stupid. I also tell you guys have never interacted with anything but the suburian way of life. ". Get his slobbish gangsta-wannabe baggy clothes wearing reefer smoking 'I don't know how to pronounce a simple word like cool' ass thrown out if you have any chance at all." I use to live in a shelterd suburban life also, I hated rap (still don't like it), and thought the same way. I then actually talked to these slobbish gangsta-wannabe people and found out they arn't half bad. I already know whats going to happen, and so there really isn't a point to bother posting except for wasting a little time before I turn in.

 

[aolsuxs]

I really dont mind this...disscusion were having but to change the thread title...lol, hillarious. So not everyone agrees with your opinion. I'll be damned. Despite who is wrong and whos right or whatever, to change the thread and whine that your thread is "highjacked" and to lock it since at the time you were a little overwhlemed. I don't know what you expected, if you wanted a thread where everyone just kissed your ass and just compliemented on the wonderful decisions you've made, what a great kid you are, how you are pefect, how big your slong is then this isn't the right place. How bout I make a thread, a poll, asks whats everyones favoritie fast food restaurant. I'd have various restaurants, MCD, BK, Jack in The Box, Etc etc. Now Lets say my favorite is...Burger King however I the results showed that the majority of people liked McDonalds. Well holy fvcking sh!t people dont agree on everything. Better change the thread "McDonald Nazis Hijack my thread. Please lock" Always good to hear the other side of the story, not run away when you hear anything other then yours.

 

[Eli]

LMAO..

This thread is funny.

Especially the first post... You're like having a coronary because your roommate "does weed"... because it's "illegal"..

OMG.. Alert the secret service!

You should be glad your roommate has some sort of brain, and wasn't shooting up.

 

[FrancesBeansRevenge]

My god. You are incredibly uptight and anal retentive.
It's no wonder no one can live with you.
Who the hell wants to live with a ballbuster like you?

Tip: Get a life. Your geek hobbies and messageboard activities don't count. Get a real life. With friends and girls and even a little partying.
I think it would go a LONG way to removing the large object from your arse.

It's funny. Rotten roommate after rotten roommate or uptight loser who can't stand anyone having any fun?
You make the call.

 

[narzy]

weed in his room = weed in your room you both guilty of possession of a controlled substance. you need to turn him in to protect your own ass, all that needs to happen is the room get searched, they find sh!t, and he say's "thats not mine it must be my roomates!" and bamo! your fsked.

you need to turn him in to protect yourself, ASAP.

 

[Kerouactivist]

This thread is in dire need of a poll

hehe

I wonder what it would look like hmmm.........

 

[Linflas]

Originally posted by: Amused

Originally posted by: DeadHead

Originally posted by: Amused
I'd get rid of him as soon as possible, not because I'm morally against smoking pot (I'm not), nor because I agree with our drug laws (I don't) but because of the legal ramifications.

What people here are failing to recognize is the way the police and courts treat drug cases. If he were to be caught with any significant amount of pot on him, the police can and more than likely will seize any and all possessions in his place of residence. It matters not who's possessions they are. It will then be up to NightFlyer to prove, through court, what possessions are his, and that he was not involved in the drugs. In short, because of our oppressive drug law enforcement, NightFlyer will be guilty until proven innocent... or more to the point, his property will.

I'll bet money a lot of the people getting on his case in this thread still live at home with their parents. Did you know if you were caught with a signifigant amount of drugs in your parent's house, the DA could have your parent's house, cars, bank accounts and all property seized? They can protest all they want, but they wont get a thing back until they get a lawyer and fight the seizure in court.

Let me reiterate that I am 100% opposed to the War on Drugs. But in the atmosphere that exists today, I would not allow a drug user to live with me. I have too much to lose and I'm not willing to take the time and money required to get it back.

To you and NuclearFusi0n1. The guy was caught with 2 roaches for 2 people and a rolling device. He is in college which mean he probably just moved from at least a few cities away. NightFlyerGTI is the one who came up with the assumtion they will search the room because the guy had to give his address. He is obviously not a dealer, and you need more then two roachs ( a LOT more) to have them consider siezing or even searching the residence. If they found a scale on him and other drugs, then you have to start worring. There is no way in hell they will sieze the entire dorm room full of stuff until they find out somehow this guy is at least a drug dealer. Its weed, the penelty shows its not a big crime to smoke it. Just remeber the thought of raiding came from the guy starting this thread.

THIS time he had two roaches. What happens when he finds a really good deal on a couple of ounces? What happens if he's caught with his dealer in his car, and the cops assume the large quantity is his? Remember, cops now will assume you're a dealer even if you have less than a ounce on you, or if you have your weed in more than one baggy.

The point is, NightFlyer does not do drugs. He obviously does not know this guy, or what he is involved with. Why should NF take ANY risk for this guy's actions when he doesn't even do the drugs?

It's just not worth keeping the guy as a roomie. I'm not advocating ratting him out. Just changing roomies. Besides, the guy is a slob. I'd have booted him a long time before this simply for being a slob.

You are kidding yourselves if you think the threat of asset forfeiture is not a serious one. Once assets are seized the DEA has 60 days to legally turn your former possessions into the governments property and believe me they make enough money off of this process to have a great interest in meeting the legal hurdles. Likewise with the sharing programs that are setup between the local law enforcement units and the Feds gives the locals a vested interest in turning seized assets into government property as well. The only thing a college student would have going for himself in this process is that they make a lot more money off of seized aircraft, cars, vessels, and cash to spend much time worrying about seizing a dorm room full of clothing, a stereo, TV, and a couple of PCs.

 

[ndee]

Originally posted by: NightFlyerGTI

Illegal actions eh? Hmm I rolled a stop sign today, thats illegal, guess I am slime. Oh and the other day I saw a little kid jay walk, guess hes slime too. If the guy is shooting heroine or doing something rather serious then I can see your concern. However if like you said he doesn't smoke in your room or doesn't hurt anyone/damage anything then I would leave him be. It's his life. Again the whole "people who use drugs are evil people" gets a little old.

Good for you. FYI, I'm probably the worst speeder on this entire board, but that doesn't make me slime. Not always anyway. The illegal actions I'm talking about here are DRUGS. Serious illegal actions. Not rolling through stop signs.

What's the difference between him shooting heroine and weed? He's doing illegal drugs and openly admits it. Drugs are drugs. Yes it's his life, and all people who use drugs may not all be 'evil', but they sure as hell aren't saints.

ROTFLMAO. You think heroine and weed is the same? Drugs are drugs? Cigarettes are drugs, alcohol is a drug. A drug is something you get addicted to right? Something you REALLY need. Then chocolate can also be a drug.

Now seriously, if you're putting heroine and weed in the same category, I can't take you for real.

 

[Skyclad1uhm1]

Originally posted by: NuclearFusi0n1

Originally posted by: NuclearFusi0n1
WHO THE HELL CARES IF ITS "JUST WEED"?

It's freakin illegal, and that could get NFGTI'S ROOM RAIDED, and that's NOT COOL.
Any roommate that can't even disguise his pot smoking well enough to avoid a potetial RAID isn't cool :|

fvck 'im :disgust:

nobody wants to challenge my statement? figures...

Apparently he could disguise it well enough for NightFlyerGTI to never notice it. Guess that means someone is stuck to his screen too much if he can't notice a drugs addict with 3176195 tons of coke in his room. After all, everyone knows every pot user will start using harddrugs within seconds too! Do you have a Divx movie, or a single copied piece of software? Or maybe a downloaded mp3? Hope the cops put you in jail for that!

 

[tcsenter]

I also tell you guys have never interacted with anything but the suburian way of life. ". Get his slobbish gangsta-wannabe baggy clothes wearing reefer smoking 'I don't know how to pronounce a simple word like cool' ass thrown out if you have any chance at all." I use to live in a shelterd suburban life also, I hated rap (still don't like it), and thought the same way. I then actually talked to these slobbish gangsta-wannabe people and found out they arn't half bad.

Woah there, Nelly. I lived or worked in or near Flint Michigan for 30 years. It doesn't get any more non-sheltered non-suburban than Dort HWY and Lippincott, where I worked third shift for nearly three years, or Grand Traverse and 5th Ave, where I also worked second or third shift for three years, and socialized with the locals all the time.

Sure, they're not 'half bad' to socialize and shoot the sh-t with from time to time. Hell, I've known a few people who have been esteemed guests at some of our finer federal and state prisons who aren't 'half bad' to shoot the sh-t with from time to time. At one time or another, I've mingled with prostitutes, drug dealers, street vagrants, drug addicts, gang members, convicted felons, you name it. I've got friends in places so low that you'd piss your pants just driving through with the windows up and doors locked.

Sure, they're not 'half-bad' to socialize with now and again. I mean, the cretins of our society aren't always acting like cretins around the clock, they can be downright friendly if they know you.

That doesn't mean I trust them any further than I could throw a house and I sure as hell don't want to be 'roomies' or neighbors with them.

We can agree there is something FUNDAMENTALLY WRONG and in a major way with the character of a person who seeks to emulate a highly disfunctional culture that is entrenched in ghetto mentalities and criminal lifestyles.

 

[ndee]

Originally posted by: Skyclad1uhm1

Originally posted by: NuclearFusi0n1

Originally posted by: NuclearFusi0n1
WHO THE HELL CARES IF ITS "JUST WEED"?

It's freakin illegal, and that could get NFGTI'S ROOM RAIDED, and that's NOT COOL.
Any roommate that can't even disguise his pot smoking well enough to avoid a potetial RAID isn't cool :|

fvck 'im :disgust:

nobody wants to challenge my statement? figures...

Apparently he could disguise it well enough for NightFlyerGTI to never notice it. Guess that means someone is stuck to his screen too much if he can't notice a drugs addict with 3176195 tons of coke in his room. After all, everyone knows every pot user will start using harddrugs within seconds too! Do you have a Divx movie, or a single copied piece of software? Or maybe a downloaded mp3? Hope the cops put you in jail for that!

[Edit] Didn't get that you were being sarcastic [/Edit]

 

[iamme]

Originally posted by: ndee

Originally posted by: Skyclad1uhm1

Originally posted by: NuclearFusi0n1

Originally posted by: NuclearFusi0n1
WHO THE HELL CARES IF ITS "JUST WEED"?

It's freakin illegal, and that could get NFGTI'S ROOM RAIDED, and that's NOT COOL.
Any roommate that can't even disguise his pot smoking well enough to avoid a potetial RAID isn't cool :|

fvck 'im :disgust:

nobody wants to challenge my statement? figures...

Apparently he could disguise it well enough for NightFlyerGTI to never notice it. Guess that means someone is stuck to his screen too much if he can't notice a drugs addict with 3176195 tons of coke in his room. After all, everyone knows every pot user will start using harddrugs within seconds too! Do you have a Divx movie, or a single copied piece of software? Or maybe a downloaded mp3? Hope the cops put you in jail for that!

That's about the most stupid statement I've ever heard: "After all, everyone knows every pot user will start using harddrugs within seconds too!" I smoke weed too, but I would never ever touch harddrugs. I know where the border is. Period.

It's the same like if you speed a little bit on the highway: After all, everyone knows every speeder will start speeding in residential areas.

I believeSkyclad1uhm1 was being sarcastic.

Anyways, if NightFlyerGTI doesn't want it in his room, then let him be. His roommate is doing something illegal. It doesn't matter what your opinions are on drugs....if there's a risk that NightFlyerGTI can get in trouble for it, he's got the right to ask his roommate to leave.

 

[bonk102]

i'm all for letting people smoke if they wanna smoke,

BUT

if he is keeping drugs in your SHARED apt. then you could go down for things he is doing, that aint' right

 

[snooker]

I think you have no clue. I am willing to bet you have alot of 'friends' who are pot smokers but do not disclose that to you because of your views towards it. I am willing to bet at least a few of the professors there are pot smokers, but since it is illegal to use they will not ever disclose they smoke weed.

Back in the 60's when weed was out there everywhere the government tried to pass weed off as a death drug that makes you go blind, which has since been proven false. I have never heard anyone 'smoking' themselves to death like other drugs can do these days.

I can tell when someone has never tried weed before. They are under the impression it is a life ending drug that will make someone homeless and jobless, which isn't true. I know several 'high profile' people in my community that smokes weed and has a huge job. Just like beer, you need to know when and when not to use.

As long as he is respectful enough to no bring it into the dorm, DON'T WORRY ABOUT IT. IT ISN'T YOUR PROBLEM OR ANY OF YOUR BUSINESS WHAT HE DOES IN HIS OWN FREE TIME, EVEN IF IT IS AGAINST THE LAW.

BTW, I am an ex'pot smoker and can tell you first hand, it does not make you go kill people or rob people for it. It is nothing like any other drug in the sense that it makes you go mad if you do not have it.

If your friend wants to spend his money on a bag instead of a movie, then let him!! It is his life and you do not have any right in the world to interfer in another human beings life unless it is directly affecting you, which it sounds like it isn't other then the knowledge knowing he does


Just look at it this way, If it was soooo bad, then cops who pull people over and find just a little bit and make the owner of it dump it out and rub it into the ground would instead be sending them to jail and throw the key away, which for the most part they don't unless you are a prick to the cop.


Also, The Brits just passed a law that makes pot posession a ticketable offense instead of an arrestable offense. The US usually follows suit with Britian in it's laws etc... so I am actually expecting pot to be 'not as illegal' in 5-10 years.


(Steps down from the soapbox)

 

[Linflas]

Just look at it this way, If it was soooo bad, then cops who pull people over and find just a little bit and make the owner of it dump it out and rub it into the ground would instead be sending them to jail and throw the key away, which for the most part they don't unless you are a prick to the cop.

Funny how common this used to be before "The War On Drugs" began in earnest. I recall being in an apartment that the cops came by to ask us to quiet down a bit and there were bongs on the table in plain view. The cops were friendly, we were friendly, they politely suggested we may want to make those disappear in the future before we answered the door. Another time we were stopped in a friends Bug and when the state trooper came up to the car and got the license and registration he suggested that the driver might want to push what was under his feet back under the seat before he "saw" it. It turned out that when we stopped the guys ounce had rolled out from it's hiding place and was laying under the drivers feet. Different world, different times.

 

[kherman]

Weed is easy to quit if you have will power. There is no chemcial addiction. You don't get sick if you quit it in a cold turkey type of manner.

Also, he sounds like the type of person that just does it on the weekend as a casual user. Not an every day user. There are two distinctive types. Everyday user and the type that does it after a night of drinking.