Captante
Lifer
- Oct 20, 2003
- 30,277
- 10,783
- 136
Given capacity issues and clinical guidelines, I doubt hospitals will admit you unless you actually need supervised medical care.
Depending on where you are possibly not even then.
Given capacity issues and clinical guidelines, I doubt hospitals will admit you unless you actually need supervised medical care.
I was SO HAPPY when I discovered that I was suddenly eligible for my first jab to find that it WAS Moderna, because I figured it was a better bet than Pfizer. My reasoning was that the less stringent refrigeration requirements suggested it was more apt to do the job. Other than that it was rated at 94% while Pfizer was 94.5% IIRC effective, the difference seemingly negligible statistically. I figure a Moderna booster makes more sense than a Pfizer booster.
We really need to stop doing this. You can't compare across clinical trials like that, especially when they may measure their efficacy differently and have differing patient populations.Other than that it was rated at 94% while Pfizer was 94.5% IIRC effective, the difference seemingly negligible statistically.
I was SO HAPPY when I discovered that I was suddenly eligible for my first jab to find that it WAS Moderna, because I figured it was a better bet than Pfizer. My reasoning was that the less stringent refrigeration requirements suggested it was more apt to do the job. Other than that it was rated at 94% while Pfizer was 94.5% IIRC effective, the difference seemingly negligible statistically. I figure a Moderna booster makes more sense than a Pfizer booster.
We really need to stop doing this. You can't compare across clinical trials like that, especially when they may measure their efficacy differently and have differing patient populations.
It also sends the wrong messages about the vaccines. Even now, the best vaccine is any that had EUA or is approved, since they all worked (relative to placebo controls) to keep people not dead and out of the hospital.
If anyone ever runs a well setup head to head trial of the vaccines, feel free to go ham on those comparative results.
Honestly was happy to get any vaccine. When I was eligible in early April, the day I went, I had one choice: J&J or reschedule for another day (the site did not know in advance what they would give out on each day). The data for J&J has been fine. The side effects were kind of annoying: modest fever for a night, and some fatigue, but that can happen with nearly any vaccine.I got Pfizer and honestly was thrilled ! I was in the first wave of the vaccinated December 21 & January 11. Got my booster shot on 08/31 which was also Pfizer. I felt grateful and privileged to be able to get this protection so quickly. Round 2 & 3 kicked my rump, I can only imagine what Moderna would have done to me.
Husband and son got Moderna later when they were eligible husband felt lousy afterward, son had a sore arm and fatigue. All of us were thrilled to be vaccinated !
Before I get a booster, which one has mmWave 5G for best throughput?Either mRNA shot is fine far as I'm concerned. I wouldn't get the J&J myself at this point unless it was the only option.
I was given Moderna for the first round ... felt crappy after shot #1 but had very few side effects from #2 beyond a sore arm.
Was with some family today. One is a partner in a pretty big law firm in Jersey. They are really wanting people back at the office a few days a week. It's not just management, a good amount of employees want to have a hybrid setup. The pure zoom life is not for a bunch of folks, and it's just not as efficient or interesting for a lot of their work
Who would have thunk it. A species very invested in three dimensional interactions is not all suited to just two dimensional land.
That was the biggest factor for my partner, and I didn't have any preferences, but given it was easier to just book our appointments together, I followed her lead.I was SO HAPPY when I discovered that I was suddenly eligible for my first jab to find that it WAS Moderna, because I figured it was a better bet than Pfizer. My reasoning was that the less stringent refrigeration requirements suggested it was more apt to do the job. Other than that it was rated at 94% while Pfizer was 94.5% IIRC effective, the difference seemingly negligible statistically. I figure a Moderna booster makes more sense than a Pfizer booster.
To be a little fair, roughly 12% of the population isn't eligible yet. Although they are likely to have very low uptake rate.Woah did not realize the vaccine rate in the states was so low.
I assume that when the 5-11 year olds become eligible that their antivax parents won't let them get it. Similar to the numbers that i know personally of teens that "say" they don't want it when their antivax parents say they leave the decision up to the kids. Of coarse most of those are going to go along with their parents views.To be a little fair, roughly 12% of the population isn't eligible yet. Although they are likely to have very low uptake rate.
I used to get most of my vaccinations from my father, an M.D., and an educated man who would bring the vaccines home (from the hospital, I assumed) and put them in the refrigerator. When he came at us with a syringe, we submitted willfully, always. He wore the pants in the house and took no nonsense. He was the first of the family to become a physician, starting a tradition. One needs the fingers of both hands to count them all now. I can't imagine that anyone eligible in our family isn't covid vaxxed.I assume that when the 5-11 year olds become eligible that their antivax parents won't let them get it. Similar to the numbers that i know personally of teens that "say" they don't want it when their antivax parents say they leave the decision up to the kids. Of coarse most of those are going to go along with their parents views.
Nice.
I look at that and wonder if it's satirical. It evidently is, but a lot of people wouldn't notice the bit about the funeral home. They could have added notice of a 15% discount for covid victims. Or maybe they weren't being satirical???