What a cute strawman. I said it was a "consequence of your (...and CNN's, and others') bad advice from January." I never said you were exclusively to blame. You weren't even the only one in this thread saying that garbage.
Also, stop saying the CDC "still" recommends that people not run out and buy masks. The CDC did not advise against buying them back in January. That was CNN's take on what the CDC actually said. Back then the CDC merely said it wasn't necessary to wear them at that point unless you had an infected patient, and I agree because we didn't have community transmission in January. It's right there in the freakin' article you linked:
Americans are buying up surgical masks from major retailers to protect themselves from the novel coronavirus despite the CDC's position that the virus poses a low threat to the US. Some masks are effective in preventing transmission, but experts say Americans don't need to wear them.
www.cnn.com
Unlike you, others here correctly identified the actual problem with mask supplies (hint: it wasn't American panic buying) and took correct action according to what the CDC *actually* said. They said it wasn't needed "at this point" (Jan) and we correctly asked ourselves how we would get them at a later point should the become needed. We knew that the bulk were going to China and major suppliers were already selling out. We also knew that they were recommending them for healthy people in contact with infected people.
...and yet you lecture others here on "nuance."
If they weren't in short supply domestically then you absolutely would see mask recommendations for people in high-risk groups if they had to go out... and the people who care for them... if not everyone. There is no question that their current recommendation is to ration the limited supplies of N95+ masks for healthcare workers. They make that clear.
Absolutely no one predicted it would be contained. That is pure delusion you manufactured to justify your earlier position.
Once again, you fail to grasp the meaning of "immediate." You specifically addressed people "wringing their hands" about this and repeatedly argued why they shouldn't be immediately concerned. We told you that it wasn't about the immediate concern and was about the near-future but you just doubled-down on how the flu was a bigger concern. It does not take a genius to know that the more immediate concern != the bigger concern. I mean... DUH.
...but let's just wait until it's not fine even when we know it's coming.
They never changed their mind. You just failed to understand the "nuance" between immediate/current and future (well, now) concerns.
Of course more people had died of the flu than a brand new disease that wasn't even spreading in our country yet. How could that not be the case even if it had a 100% mortality rate? One only needed to look at what was happening where it was just getting started to know why it was INSANE to take comfort that more people here had died of flu. We're more people dying of the flu in Wuhan since it started spreading there? Nope. Only a delusional person would hide behind flu stats even at the very start of your participation in this thread.
...and now you don't seem know what the word "literally" means since you broke out that strawman again. I never said it was your recommendation alone. I said it was because of you and your ilk. You know it yet you made this defensive post anyway and called me a fool. "Delusional" is not flattering but I didn't stoop to calling you names. Maybe you aren't aware of the rule changes here?
Just stop defending the indefensible and admit: You were wrong. None of this easily disproven "CDC changed their mind so I did too." crap. You spread media lies about the flu being worse, mislabeled it "medical consensus," and you should be sorry.
You most certainly are the one spouting advice contrary to expert opinion, even in this very post.
They said that improper use CAN increase the chance of infection. You just said it does increase chances of infection, which is the opposite of what they said even in your own links.
Now, I already told you why the CDC is recommending against the general public wearing face masks today. Heck, the CDC already told you: to save them for healthcare workers because they are now in short supply.
Supplies weren't so short when you first started spouting your nonsense. It was mostly just Amazon and a few medical suppliers who were sold out since many foreign buyers hadn't figured out you could order from hardware stores, home improvements stores, contractor supply, etc. ..
but, no: CNN just had to misattribute the depletion of Amazon stock to Americans panic-buying and you were totally on-board to spread that false information and shame anyone for getting masks while they still could. Again: The media is not synonymous with experts. Hearing it from CNN in an article that cites the CDC and some doctor does not mean the CDC came to the same conclusions CNN. Where was the CDC telling Americans not to panic-buy masks back in January?
Might as well stop taking so much pride in posting links to the CDC mask recommendations while you're at it. We saw and discussed those CDC articles while you were still in hiding. We noted how they would switch between referencing "face masks" in general and then discuss N95 and up. We noted that they never said N95 masks were not effective. Welcome to weeks ago. I haven't donned my N95 yet but when/if I do I will be shaving off the beard and reading up on proper technique.