Bump, any updates?
How do you keep your abrasive flat? Do you use some sort of sanding block?
How do you keep your abrasive flat? Do you use some sort of sanding block?
I just bought a Thermaltake Frio OCK... the base was like that...anecdotal comments -> I've lapped a fair amount of CPU's and HSF's in my time, this H100 was by far the most twisted, warped, pain in the freaking ass surface I have ever tried to lap.
And that's why the Amish people reject modern technology That shaking despite a tripod is clearly the work of the devil.technology, you got to love it!
I just bought a Thermaltake Frio OCK... the base was like that
It took me two sessions to even get to remotely fix it. It's now pretty flat and shiny, but the edges are still "roundy" (I don't know how to describe it - but in your pic atop your text I quoted, it is something like that... the very edge is "lower" than the flat surface, at least on that one side of yours - my sides are all like that, I hate it, I must have sanded it in a rage due to how warped the POS was). Not sure I can live with it, but the damned thing was so warped. After I first sanded it with the rough grit, I said to myself "oh crap, I'd need a metal file, not a sandpaper".
And that's why the Amish people reject modern technology That shaking despite a tripod is clearly the work of the devil.
I uploaded a short video to youtube showing the "shuttle" in action.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6Nq86ZdbdA
The camera is actually mounted on a tripod but you wouldn't know it from how shaky the video is...that's actually the "auto image stabilizer" trying to track the H100 sitting on top of the shoe-box rather than keeping the background wall, lamp, table fixed in space technology, you got to love it!
That is an awesome setup.
Do you use anything to wet the paper, or do you sand dry? I restored a turntable dust cover a couple of years back, and found that Formula 409 worked nicely for this.
Thanks for the tip, will come in useful when I get the backbone to sand a good CPU :thumbsup:For the CPU I strictly do dry-sanding only. You do not want to risk having the copper-loaded slurry making its way into the CPU pocket that is underneath the IHS itself (there is a hole on one side of the package).
Hello there, Idontcare -- we've been poking in these forum doors since '07 if I remember. . . .
I have the Noctua D-14. I could've easily sprung for the Megahalem. Just off the top of my head, the water-cooling options may give you about 10C to 15C advantage. I took a look at the H100, and was impressed. I must've looked at one of those preassembled H80's or something even less formidable. And I haven't attempted to build a WC rig yet. That being said, I did see some statistical results comparing some water-cooling systems to the air options, and planning on at least a possibility of replacing the Noctua with a decent WC kit, I somehow came to the conclusion about that 10C to 15C advantage.
Somebody else, please correct me if I'm wrong about that.
I've just spent a few days putting an i7-2600K through its paces. Techs at ASUS cite their own figures that something like 40% of their 2600K's will OC to 4.6/4.7 Ghz; another 40% might go to 4.8/4.9, and the remainder will OC to 5.0 Ghz. While that may be "on air," it just seems to me you have two choices:
-- Stay within the thermal and voltage specs (although there apparently isn't a reliable, official voltage spec -- but the Sandy is 32nm silicon like the Nehalem, so infer it from that)
-- Cool the heck out of it and overvolt the CPU until you get to 5.0 or beyond
With the air coolers, you can stay within the thermal spec and still OC to the Nehalem voltage spec -- more . . . or less . . . . You might be able to reach 4.7 Ghz and only peak out the temperature at 4 to 5C above the throttling threshold -- that is, I mean by throttling according to the TM1 "Adaptive Thermal Monitoring." People say [people say . . ] that you can run these processors beyond 80C, and the TJunction temperature is around 98C.
Some people are pushing these things well above the thermal spec of 72.6C on air. It's thin silicon, so you can choose to add a little more risk with each successive increment of voltage and heat.
So it all depends on whether the 10 to 15C actually makes it possible to get stability at a lower voltage. I'm just not so sure that it does. You may stay well within the 72.6 C limit or any looser limit you care to define. After that, it's just a matter of the voltage.
With my system, I was able to get to 4.73 with the peak "Maximum stress" IntelBurnTest temperature at around 76C. That was with the Noctua. Also keep in mind that I have a biased thermal sensor under the cap that probably contributes to reporting a temperature that is 5C or so in excess of the true temperature. So it MAY be that my 4.73 Ghz was really giving a temperature of about 72 to 73C.
And the fact is -- if you're cautious about voltage, if that's the game you're playing with yourself (because that's my game, too) -- the Noctua or competing heatpipe cooler would be adequate to get to "that point" -- 1.37V or so. At that point -- maybe a little sooner -- your temperatures will be pushing toward 80C. Maybe, with the bias in my own sensors and a "guesstimate" about what they really are, 75C. Maybe a tad better.
I've had exchanges with others here -- and seen forum posts elsewhere -- with people reporting 4.8 Ghz and temperatures in the low 80's. One Intel tech told an enthusiast: "Who SAID you can run these chips above 80C degrees?!"
That's what the Intel guy said, and others here may tell you something different.
Thanks!
Depending on what I am sanding, I do both wet and dry.
For the CPU I strictly do dry-sanding only. You do not want to risk having the copper-loaded slurry making its way into the CPU pocket that is underneath the IHS itself (there is a hole on one side of the package).
For the HSF, and only for the coarser grits (220/400/800), I do wet sanding because the paper loads up rather quick.
When I get to the finer grits (1000/2000/3000) I do dry sanding because I actually want to take advantage of the dynamic nature of the effective grit as the paper becomes loaded. The more you load the 1000 grit, the more it begins to effectively become a 1500 or 2000 grit paper near the end of the sanding.
Makes the transitions between successive grit paper much more seamless IMO.
Here's what I'm thinking in pictures....
Here's what we've had for years, not so great...
Then the bow came, and it was pretty darn good (almost too good in this pic, oh well, these were done quickly):
This assuming the bow is created because mounting pressure is along the top edges, and will happen to the entire base uniformly (or nearly). Nikh's idea to put the pressure back in the middle is awesome, but until we can mount with pressure down the middle, there will always be a bow (theory).
Now if u think my spanking of you is over... why did u blow all that money in sinks when u could of just gone water, and seen temps which would be illegal to post in that comparison?
At the very least IDC, your gpu's would of seen an OMGWTFBBQ reduction in half the current temps it has.
I thought he's doing it for sake of comparison, and he's putting the other cooler into a HTPC
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
IDC why did u lap that H#O.
:\
OK guys.... there has been a phase shift away from flat blocks for a while now.
We learned that when u apply pressure with a step, you get a better mount.
What does a Step mean?
Its a point in the center which forces the IHS on the CPU to warp, and hence get a better contact over the die location.
A better explanation from my pal Vapor.
This is also why orientation is important in mounting a waterblock, and its vital to do more then 1 mount if your going after consistency.
This applies only in waterblocks... heat sinks as far as i know dont see a big advantage in having a step.
In waterblocks this step is more called a BOW effect.
Now if u think my spanking of you is over... why did u blow all that money in sinks when u could of just gone water, and seen temps which would be illegal to post in that comparison?
At the very least IDC, your gpu's would of seen an OMGWTFBBQ reduction in half the current temps it has.
You'll note above in post #78 that I showed my H100 was significantly concave, not convex as needed to accomplish the effect you are referencing above.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO