NIE Terrorism Report Released

Witling

Golden Member
Jul 30, 2003
1,448
0
0
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence has released portions of the National Intelligence Estimate that has been characterized as saying that the Iraq war has increased Muslim extremism. This report was prepared by the administration and can be seen at National Intelligence Estimate

As of Tuesday afternoon when the report was leaked, the Web site was VERY slow.
 

Todd33

Diamond Member
Oct 16, 2003
7,842
2
81
Of course they will not release it all, they cherry pick the parts they want. Classic Bush WH.
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,360
126
Originally posted by: Todd33
Of course they will not release it all, they cherry pick the parts they want. Classic Bush WH.

You honestly think it would be in the best interest of national security to release classified info? ::boggle::
 

Balt

Lifer
Mar 12, 2000
12,673
482
126
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: Todd33
Of course they will not release it all, they cherry pick the parts they want. Classic Bush WH.

You honestly think it would be in the best interest of national security to release classified info? ::boggle::

Bush just did. What's your point?
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: Todd33
Of course they will not release it all, they cherry pick the parts they want. Classic Bush WH.

Bush has asked for the entire report to be declassified.

So, as usual, you are full of FUD.
 

shadow9d9

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
8,132
2
0
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: Todd33
Of course they will not release it all, they cherry pick the parts they want. Classic Bush WH.

You honestly think it would be in the best interest of national security to release classified info? ::boggle::

(AP) WASHINGTON A declassified government intelligence report says the war in Iraq has become a "cause celebre" for Islamic extremists, breeding deep resentment of the U.S. that is likely to get worse before it gets better.

In the bleak report, released Tuesday on President Bush's orders, the nation's most veteran analysts conclude that despite serious damage to the leadership of al-Qaida, the threat from Islamic extremists has spread both in numbers and in geographic reach.

It was only releasing the obvious...
 

shadow9d9

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
8,132
2
0
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: Todd33
Of course they will not release it all, they cherry pick the parts they want. Classic Bush WH.

Bush has asked for the entire report to be declassified.

So, as usual, you are full of FUD.

Actually what bush said the report said was FOS:


the report said:

_ The increased role of Iraqis in opposing al-Qaida in Iraq might lead the terror group's veteran foreign fighters to focus their efforts outside the country.

_ While Iran and Syria are the most active state sponsors of terror, many other countries will be unable to prevent their resources from being exploited by terrorists.

_ The underlying factors that are fueling the spread of the extremist Muslim movement outweigh its vulnerabilities. These factors are entrenched grievances and a slow pace of reform in home countries, rising anti-U.S. sentiment and the Iraq war.


Keep note of this last sentence, which show's Bush's public response to be yet another lie.

"Bush: It's Naive To Think Iraq War Worsened Terror"

 

shadow9d9

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2004
8,132
2
0
Virtually all assessments of the current situation were bad news. The report's few positive notes were couched in conditional terms, depending on successful completion of difficult tasks ahead for the U.S. and its allies. In one example, analysts concluded that more responsive political systems in Muslim nations could erode support for jihadist extremists.

Bush and his top advisers have said the formerly classified assessment of global terrorism supported their arguments that the world is safer because of the war. But more than three pages of stark judgments warning about the spread of terrorism contrasted with the administration's glass-half-full declarations.

"If this trend continues, threats to U.S. interests at home and abroad will become more diverse, leading to increasing attacks worldwide," the document says. "The confluence of shared purpose and dispersed actors will make it harder to find and undermine jihadist groups."

The democrats wanted to discuss this document and GUESS WHAT, the republicans OUTRIGHT REFUSED and voted against a discussion! We are SOOOO SAFE NOW! MMMHMM!
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
And once again the libbies are befuddled.

You guys claimed Bush was selectively "cherry picking" portions of this report to release. I proved you wrong, as usual, and now that the entire report has been declassified you've moved on to trying to tear it apart.

EDIT: Tear it apart = spinning it to your liberal agenda
 

Balt

Lifer
Mar 12, 2000
12,673
482
126
Originally posted by: Pabster
And once again the libbies are befuddled.

You guys claimed Bush was selectively "cherry picking" portions of this report to release. I proved you wrong, as usual, and now that the entire report has been declassified you've moved on to trying to tear it apart.

EDIT: Tear it apart = spinning it to your liberal agenda

Who needs to tear it apart? Do you actually believe the assessment in that document paints a pretty picture of our "War on Terror"? :roll:
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,360
126
I dont know why everybody doesnt realize if were to do NOTHING terror would go away! Wake up people!
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: blackangst1
I dont know why everybody doesnt realize if were to do NOTHING terror would go away! Wake up people!

Got to get their tin foil hats off first :laugh:

It is comical yet extremely sad that some actually believe that. Many are right here.
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
Almost as comical as the ones that think their keystrokes are some how going to make them brave like the men who are actually over there dying for their warmongering.
 

Corn

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 1999
6,390
29
91
Originally posted by: blackangst1
I dont know why everybody doesnt realize if were to do NOTHING terror would go away! Wake up people!

I long for the good old days, you know, before the Iraq war when Muslim extremists loved us and would have never considered attacking us.........
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
36,502
10,773
136
Originally posted by: Corn
Originally posted by: blackangst1
I dont know why everybody doesnt realize if were to do NOTHING terror would go away! Wake up people!

I long for the good old days, you know, before the Iraq war when Muslim extremists loved us and would have never considered attacking us.........

Don?t forget the part where we must covert to Islam and be ruled by Shira law. Suppose we should apologize for not doing that sooner eh? Then you can forget about religious tolerance, freedom of speech, and women and minority rights. Small price to pay for appeasing the aggressor eh?
 

Todd33

Diamond Member
Oct 16, 2003
7,842
2
81
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: Todd33
Of course they will not release it all, they cherry pick the parts they want. Classic Bush WH.

Bush has asked for the entire report to be declassified.

So, as usual, you are full of FUD.

LOL, The Dems do, Bush does not. If he wanted it declassified it would be done, it's his call. But in your world white is black and Iraq is going great. They could declassify almost all of it with no national security issues, those who wrote it and read it have already said so.

CAPITOL HILL (AP) - The top Republican and Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee are calling on the White House to declassify a high-level intelligence assessment on global terror.

The review reportedly states that the war in Iraq has contributed to global terrorism.

Senator Pat Roberts, a Kansas Republican, says the American people should be able to see a public version of the report and draw their own conclusions about its contents. Robert says media reports have so far given a "false impression."

Senator Jay Rockefeller, the committee's top Democrat, says releasing the report would "contribute greatly to the public debate" on counterterrorism policies.

The report distills the thinking of senior U.S. intelligence analysts working throughout the nation's 16 spy agencies. Some Democrats are calling for hearings on the report's findings.

http://www.cbs47.tv/news/national/story...d=14C0C153-6D2A-413A-9077-106D67BEE4C0

Bush said he has ordered to Director of National Security John Negroponte to declassify the report's key findings during a joint White House press conference with Afghan President Hamid Karzai.

i.e. Cherry pick it...

Originally posted by: Pabster
And once again the libbies are befuddled.

You guys claimed Bush was selectively "cherry picking" portions of this report to release. I proved you wrong, as usual, and now that the entire report has been declassified you've moved on to trying to tear it apart.

EDIT: Tear it apart = spinning it to your liberal agenda

In what world (Fox news?) did you prove anything? No links, no quotes, just something you pulled out of your a$$. Typical right wing research - you guys hate facts.
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: umbrella39
Almost as comical as the ones that think their keystrokes are some how going to make them brave like the men who are actually over there dying for their warmongering.

The irony is overwhelming.
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: Todd33
LOL, The Dems do, Bush does not. If he wanted it declassified it would be done, it's his call. But in your world white is black and Iraq is going great. They could declassify almost all of it with no national security issues, those who wrote it and read it have already said so.

The entire report has been declassified. I suggest you find a real news source besides CBS.

In what world (Fox news?) did you prove anything? No links, no quotes, just something you pulled out of your a$$. Typical right wing research - you guys hate facts.

Like I said, find a new news source. Google News has a plethora of links for your perusal.
 

umbrella39

Lifer
Jun 11, 2004
13,816
1,126
126
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: umbrella39
Almost as comical as the ones that think their keystrokes are some how going to make them brave like the men who are actually over there dying for their warmongering.

The irony is overwhelming.

So is the dictionary perhaps you should consult one once in a while, great comeback. :roll:
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: blackangst1
I dont know why everybody doesnt realize if were to do NOTHING terror would go away! Wake up people!

Got to get their tin foil hats off first :laugh:

It is comical yet extremely sad that some actually believe that. Many are right here.
Hey Pabsie, why don't you and your buddy look up the term "straw man"? (Hint: it's a type of dishonest argument.)

It is comical, yet extremely sad, that so many of the Bush faithful turn to such dishonest arguments and diversions as a first resort. I assume that must be the best they can offer, that they have no legitimate points to support their feckless leader.
 

Balt

Lifer
Mar 12, 2000
12,673
482
126
Originally posted by: blackangst1
I dont know why everybody doesnt realize if were to do NOTHING terror would go away! Wake up people!

Hi-

Maybe you missed the memo. Our actions are spreading terrorism further. Doing nothing may not decrease terrorism, but what we are doing isn't decreasing terrorism either. In fact it appears to be having the opposite effect.

That's not my speculation, that's what is actually in that document you apparently didn't bother to read.

 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: Todd33
LOL, The Dems do, Bush does not. If he wanted it declassified it would be done, it's his call. But in your world white is black and Iraq is going great. They could declassify almost all of it with no national security issues, those who wrote it and read it have already said so.

The entire report has been declassified. I suggest you find a real news source besides CBS.
Got any links to support your claim? I just checked half-a-dozen sites. None claimed Bush declassified the entire report. Most said something similar to the Washington Post article, dated Wednesday: "The Bush administration yesterday released portions of a classified intelligence estimate that says the global jihadist movement is growing and being fueled by the war in Iraq even as it becomes more decentralized, making it harder to identify potential terrorists and prevent attacks."

The only possible exception is Fox, which is a bit ambiguous in it's wording. Nonetheless, I don't see where even Fox claims Bush has declassified the whole report.


In what world (Fox news?) did you prove anything? No links, no quotes, just something you pulled out of your a$$. Typical right wing research - you guys hate facts.
Like I said, find a new news source. Google News has a plethora of links for your perusal.
And I assume you'll show the integrity to come back, acknowledge your error, and apologize if it turns out you misinterpreted the Fox story (or perhaps based your claims on one of Limbaugh's lies)?
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
It is comical, yet extremely sad, that so many of the Bush faithful turn to such dishonest arguments and diversions as a first resort. I assume that must be the best they can offer, that they have no legitimate points to support their feckless leader.

No straw man here. Just read through the "discussions" the last couple months and you can find plenty who imply quite clearly that if we just walked away everything would be so much better. Those terrorists would all go home!
 

Pabster

Lifer
Apr 15, 2001
16,986
1
0
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
And I assume you'll show the integrity to come back, acknowledge your error, and apologize if it turns out you misinterpreted the Fox story (or perhaps based your claims on one of Limbaugh's lies)?

I didn't read anything on Fox News, and I don't listen to Rush Limbaugh. So far you're 0/2.