Patranus
Diamond Member
- Apr 15, 2007
- 9,280
- 0
- 0
BP has some very good reasons not to try to hide behind the cap. The cap is only for spills where there is no culpability. If BP believes they are at risk (or might be) they would be much better off preemptively making a deal for a much larger sum that protects them from liability due to negligence than crossing their fingers and hoping it blows over.LOL, sure.K1052 said:View Post
BP has said that they will not seek protection under the cap.![]()
BP has some very good reasons not to try to hide behind the cap. The cap is only for spills where there is no culpability. If BP believes they are at risk (or might be) they would be much better off preemptively making a deal for a much larger sum that protects them from liability due to negligence than crossing their fingers and hoping it blows over.
Baring this we'll have to wait until August when the relief well is finished - which will work. By then gulf and everything in it will be destroyed.
http://www.theoildrum.com/
Uh oh. And they're only drilling 2 and the second only because Obama insisted. Lets hope accuracy is a little better than 1979.Dont forget the relief well could miss its mark. The one in 79 took 7 trys to hit the well in 200ft of water.![]()
Excuse my ignorance, but isn't the portion of the riser above the BOP just a straight pipe? With 10,000 psi (give or take) pushing upward, the only way the riser can successfully be sealed is if the downward force exerted by the seal's clamp around the circumference of the riser is greater than the upward force exerted by the oil.
If the above analysis is correct - and given the 21-inch diameter of the riser - the clamp (basically held on by friction) would need to exert a downward force of approximately 3.5 MILLION pounds. I'm very, very skeptical that this will work.
sEEMS TO ME, THAT IF THEY COULD DO THIS, THEY WOULD HAVE DONE IT FIRST.
I'm not sure if it was clear, but I was talking about the liability cap, not the LMRP cap. But still you can't blame them for being practical about the bottom line as long as it doesn't slow down the recovery operation.Or they could still be trying to save an asset, lots of money to gain if they can close it off and still harvest.
Uh oh. And they're only drilling 2 and the second only because Obama insisted. Lets hope accuracy is a little better than 1979.Originally Posted by JSt0rm01
Dont forget the relief well could miss its mark. The one in 79 took 7 trys to hit the well in 200ft of water.
How about changing states?
Can we freeze oil?
-John
At a mile deep, the oceanic pressures should be intense,
How about we deploy a fabric, that is extremely large, and that covers the hole in iy's center.
Shouldn't the weight of the ocean be able to stop this spill?
-John
The relevant concept is pressure, not weight. The oceanic pressure is intense, but the oil pressure is much greater.At a mile deep, the oceanic pressures should be intense,
How about we deploy a fabric, that is extremely large, and that covers the hole in iy's center.
Shouldn't the weight of the ocean be able to stop this spill?
-John
At a mile deep, the oceanic pressures should be intense,
How about we deploy a fabric, that is extremely large, and that covers the hole in iy's center.
Shouldn't the weight of the ocean be able to stop this spill?
-John
Excuse my ignorance, but isn't the portion of the riser above the BOP just a straight pipe? With 10,000 psi (give or take) pushing upward, the only way the riser can successfully be sealed is if the downward force exerted by the seal's clamp around the circumference of the riser is greater than the upward force exerted by the oil.
If the above analysis is correct - and given the 21-inch diameter of the riser - the clamp (basically held on by friction) would need to exert a downward force of approximately 3.5 MILLION pounds. I'm very, very skeptical that this will work.
Edit: On second thought, I suppose they could drill holes through the wall of the riser, and hold the clamp on with bolts through the holes. But with oil gushing out of the riser, the turbulence inside the riser would be intense. Controlling robotic arms in that turbulence in order to place nuts inside the riser to fasten the bolts would be astoundingly difficult.
I still think that's the stupidest law ever. How can you cap economic damages.
Privatizing gains and socializing losses is the essence of American capitalism? Why do you hate America and Capitalism so much?