<< The two Gore combinations, minus the Bush-Buchanan votes, add up to 6,607 lost votes for Gore. >>
Bwwahahahaha!!!
That's classic reasoning if there ever was. I really dig how the newspaper seemed unsatisfied of the standard that the democrats, in charge of recounting the ballots in PBC, used in determining what constituted a valid vote--so they had to, of course, institute their own standard and "divining" voter intent:
<< Finally, the paper found that Gore would have had a net gain of 784 votes if the board had also counted the 5,361 ballots that had a dimpled chad, which means the chad had an indentation but no light could be seen through a pinhole or its edges. >>
LOL, but that standard would have backfired huge had it been used on "every" vote cast!!!
<< Burton pointed out a problem with The Post's method. If the canvassing board had counted dimpled chads as votes, it would have had to reject the ballots where voters made a clear punch for one candidate and made a dimple for another because that would have reflected an overvote. It is unknown how many ballots would have been disqualified if that had been done. >>
ROFLMF'nAO!!!!!!