New Zen microarchitecture details

Discussion in 'CPUs and Overclocking' started by Dresdenboy, Mar 1, 2016.

  1. zentan

    zentan Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2015
    Messages:
    177
    Likes Received:
    5
    Perhaps Zen would have a significant clock-deficit to Intel or maybe they can try to make it as closer as possible but w/ taking a significant beating on power.This is all assuming that Samsung 14nm can't go head-to-head w/ Intel 14nm at higher clock-ranges. Also till now there's no actual tests or benches we have seen.Think,we should wait more.

    I am more interested in Zen-based APUs,expecially for notebook market.
    It is where AMD could have leveraged its more core advantage if it goes w/ it's traditional 4core options with or without smt enabled.It is where it could have taken well on the dual core i5s which are what most mid-range notebooks are especially in MT(this is assuming Zen is a pretty significant improvement in per core performance and close enough to ~SB or IB ipc).But it seems zen-based APUs would be launched closer to cannonlake on notebooks.Intel might be more equipped with replies by then.
     
    #226 zentan, Mar 14, 2016
    Last edited: Mar 14, 2016
  2. Soulkeeper

    Soulkeeper Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2001
    Messages:
    6,315
    Likes Received:
    9
    Bristol Ridge and AM4 motherboards release imminent ?
    Seems like FM2+ supply is drying up, any NDA on this stuff ?
     
  3. PPB

    PPB Golden Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2013
    Messages:
    1,090
    Likes Received:
    134
    You can get today a 5820K for 320 bucks while the 5960X goes for 900. If someone is telling us that a competitive 8c/16t part with similar clocks than the 5930k but smaller die size (~19nm density+HDL+2CH DDR4IMC vs 22nm density+4CH DDR4 IMC + More I/O lanes) cant go just in the middle tending to 5820k's pricing, you are just delusional.

    We can tell it is already an smaller core than HW/BW/SKL by design decisions, dismiss all the uncore stuff that needs to go in lga2011-3 and wont be in a future AM4 platform, add a node that is just a little smaller parameter wise compared to Intel's 22nm. You have an smaller die whenever you compare both designs. Then add some perks like HDL to aid the density and you have really a small die for 8c/16t.

    Instead of being butthurt that AMD is probably bringing more cores to mainstream platforms, you all should cheer for Zen's success so we finally get over the dreaded 4 core mainstream trend. And no, that rumor of Cannonlake going 6/8 core is probably implying that it's Xeon-D variant should see some consumer action, that probably will happen but with Intel's juicy margins behind it.
     
  4. Abwx

    Abwx Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2011
    Messages:
    8,246
    Likes Received:
    154
    For GF i made a simplified mathematical demonstration that could be understood by about whoever know the four basic opeations, so far it wasnt contradicted neither here nor at SA where i explained the things more extensively, the numbers i estimated besed on GFs enginers dedicated conference are confirmed by their most recent slides...

    As for Intel underdelivering the hint was posted in a conversation between engineers at EE Times after one noticed that the device performances have been degraded when shrinking to 14nm from 22nm, this wasnt difficult to check with all available infos that have a physical relevance.

    Anyway you ll have the occasion to check my sayings in a few months if GF s slides or Intel s current public numbers are not enough for you.
     
  5. Arachnotronic

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    10,439
    Likes Received:
    837
    Doesn't help me if you don't present it here and explain it thoroughly. Please do so.

    OK, great, but that's probably because you're not explaining it well enough for anybody to confirm/disprove it. You make too many assumptions and skip over a lot of steps. If you want people on internet forums to understand, please assume as little knowledge on the part of the reader as possible.

    Oh, right, the comment some dude made that Nenni ripped off and used in a blog post, pretty sure this is from user "carop." I seriously doubt that xtor device performance degraded in going from 22nm -> 14nm; the performance/power levels achieved in real shipping 14nm product from Intel very likely could not have been achieved on Intel 22nm.

    I am sure when Zen hits, Chipworks will do a detailed transistor characterization report. Too bad I don't think anybody on this forum is going to be willing to spend ~$10k on such a report.

    Anyway, still waiting for proof. Remember, you have to prove it in a way that somebody w/ little EE experience can understand the gist of the argument. Thanks.
     
  6. Azuma Hazuki

    Azuma Hazuki Senior member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2012
    Messages:
    515
    Likes Received:
    149
    Let's all calm down and wait for the benches, okay? Personally I'm excited, but we'll see.
     
  7. Arachnotronic

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    10,439
    Likes Received:
    837
    Probably the best post in this thread. Will heed your advice and bow out. :thumbsup:
     
  8. beginner99

    beginner99 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Messages:
    3,111
    Likes Received:
    85
    IPC is useless if we don't know clocks. For all we know it could have skylake IPC at 2.5 GHz and hence be quiet useless.


    Has there been any finfet CPU/SOC clocking at even 3 Ghz outside of Intel? Not that I'm aware of. Heck only CPUs outside Intel reaching 3 Ghz were from AMD. So the capabilities of process are for sure a big ?.
     
  9. IllogicalGlory

    IllogicalGlory Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2013
    Messages:
    782
    Likes Received:
    217
    I'm really hoping that Zen shakes up the low end market. I'm tired of Athlons, Pentiums and i3s. None of them are good enough anymore. Give us a real quad core <$140!

    Offering a 2C/4T Zen chip at $70+ would be great too.
     
  10. jhu

    jhu Lifer

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 1999
    Messages:
    11,913
    Likes Received:
    6
    Actually, Skylake IPC at 2.5 GHz is nothing to sneeze at. It would go well in laptops.
     
  11. jhu

    jhu Lifer

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 1999
    Messages:
    11,913
    Likes Received:
    6
    Incorrect. IBM POWER 6 already made it to 5 GHz back in 2007 on a 65 nm process.
     
  12. deasd

    deasd Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2013
    Messages:
    199
    Likes Received:
    15
    I'm surprised and glad to see Samsung to manufacture CPUs for AMD. It would have no serious capital problem like initial GloFo manufacturing FX and Llano.
     
  13. LTC8K6

    LTC8K6 Lifer

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2004
    Messages:
    24,854
    Likes Received:
    234
    FX 8 core chips are less than $140. FX 4 & 6 core chips are less than $100.

    Been at those prices for a while.
     
  14. IllogicalGlory

    IllogicalGlory Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2013
    Messages:
    782
    Likes Received:
    217
    Yes but those are mostly useless. i3s perform as well or better in games. Not interested. I should have specified CPUs with a decent uarch. The only way to make use of those requires overclocking and that's an additional expense.
     
    #239 IllogicalGlory, Mar 14, 2016
    Last edited: Mar 14, 2016
  15. 3DVagabond

    3DVagabond Lifer

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    11,813
    Likes Received:
    76
    On that note could you tell us how much it costs for Intel to have their own foundries?
     
  16. Erenhardt

    Erenhardt Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2012
    Messages:
    3,248
    Likes Received:
    101
  17. cbn

    cbn Lifer

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2009
    Messages:
    10,998
    Likes Received:
    78
    FX8300 is $120 shipped at Newegg (with free Hitman 2016 game code) for folks that don't live near a Microcenter.
     
  18. AtenRa

    AtenRa Lifer

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Messages:
    12,228
    Likes Received:
    1,022
    If ZEN is what im expecting, at the time of release with more DX-12 games and new 14/16nm GPUs already on the market, i can see them selling at high price for the first 6-12 months.

    Also i would like to talk about the die size, the 4C 8T GT2 Skylake only has 8MB of L3 Cache. If AMD will only use a single die for both Server and Desktop SKUs, then im expecting a huge L3 or even L4 Cache. That will increase the die size of a 8C 16T to 160-200mm2.
     
  19. Silverforce11

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    10,458
    Likes Received:
    3
    Server SKUs are rumored to be 16C/32T and even 32C/64T, along with APU designs.
     
  20. cbn

    cbn Lifer

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2009
    Messages:
    10,998
    Likes Received:
    78
    @AtenRA

    Regarding Zen APU, what are you thoughts on other chips AMD could use on the interposer besides HBM?

    Maybe for a mobile chip other ICs could be justified to make the laptop board more compact?

    More compact laptop board = more room for cooling and thus thinner and lighter 35W mobile device?
     
  21. myocardia

    myocardia Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2003
    Messages:
    9,223
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm not sure when you checked that price, but right now it's $110 @ newegg, and still has the free game.
     
  22. myocardia

    myocardia Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2003
    Messages:
    9,223
    Likes Received:
    0
    They will be making only 8C/16T dies first, and the 4C/8T APUs after. Their server SKUs will be using some form of the interconnect fabric that they inherited when they bought Seamicro, to join the 8C/16T dies together.
     
  23. NTMBK

    NTMBK Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2011
    Messages:
    7,312
    Likes Received:
    193
    And how, precisely, are they going to do cache coherence over Seamicro fabric? o_O
     
  24. cbn

    cbn Lifer

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2009
    Messages:
    10,998
    Likes Received:
    78
    :thumbsup:
     
  25. AtenRa

    AtenRa Lifer

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Messages:
    12,228
    Likes Received:
    1,022
    I dont know if and when they will make 16/32C dies but im only talking now for the 8C 16T dies they will release later this year. Those dies could be the same for the Desktop and Server.
    If that is the case then they could have a huge L3 and/or L4 cashe.
    Well now that i thing about it, they could aways play the same game as Intel and release a 4C 8T small die at sub 100mm2 for the desktop and entry Server market. It could be great to have a 4C 8T ZEN at $200 to compete against the Core i5. For the same price you could have more throughput but less SingleThread performnce, but with DX-12 games already in the market at the end of 2016 this sub 100mm2 die could be the next big splash for gamers.

    And with this small die, they would actually be able to sell a 2C 4T CPU for sub $100 as well.