New Zen microarchitecture details

Discussion in 'CPUs and Overclocking' started by Dresdenboy, Mar 1, 2016.

  1. Dresdenboy

    Dresdenboy Golden Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2003
    Messages:
    1,687
    Likes Received:
    455
    In a series of recent Linux kernel driver patches AMD provided further details of the family 17h processors. All these findings let the 40% claim look more likely. What they don't tell you are achievable clock frequencies and power demands. So discussing absolute performance is moot at this time still.

    Some highlights (or "lowlights" for some - as you wish ;)):
    • GMI link confirmed (first appeared on Fudzilla slide)
    • FMAC units are no longer tied to the FP3 pipe as said in the October patch - this could mean no bottleneck here - and maybe some other trick (the FP3 wasn't there by accident)
    • uOp cache
    • 4x parallel page table walker (Skylake has 2 per core)
    • Checkpointing and atomic ops mentioned (could mean finally some HW transactional memory support after proposing it in 2009)
    • 4 cycle latency 2R1W 32kB L1 D$
    I also updated the microarchitecture diagram:
    [​IMG]

    In depth analysis on my blog: http://dresdenboy.blogspot.com/2016/02/new-amd-zen-core-details-emerged.html

    Edit: Fixed a typo.
     
    #1 Dresdenboy, Mar 1, 2016
    Last edited: Aug 29, 2016
    cytg111 and TheDreamcaster like this.
  2. Loading...

    Similar Threads - microarchitecture details Forum Date
    Why no info on Intel's next microarchitecture? CPUs and Overclocking Oct 20, 2016
    Intel microarchitecture: Nehalem v. Skylake CPUs and Overclocking Apr 8, 2016
    Anand: Apple's A7 Cyclone Microarchitecture Detailed (2014-03-31) CPUs and Overclocking Mar 31, 2014
    Future Microarchitectures CPUs and Overclocking Sep 6, 2009
    Intel's Next Generation Microarchitecture Unveiled CPUs and Overclocking Mar 14, 2006

  3. grimpr

    grimpr Golden Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    Messages:
    1,091
    Likes Received:
    7
    Very interesting, so, GMI is a new fabric interconnect or an upgraded version of hypertransport?
     
  4. Dresdenboy

    Dresdenboy Golden Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2003
    Messages:
    1,687
    Likes Received:
    455
    It's new, but I didn't see anything mentioned regarding its heritage. It's very likely, that it is based on HyperTransport (and PCIe) somehow.
     
  5. turtile

    turtile Senior member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2014
    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    10
    I would assume that they used something from Seamicro? Or did they just waste almost a half billion dollars on it?
     
    #4 turtile, Mar 1, 2016
    Last edited: Mar 1, 2016
  6. swilli89

    swilli89 Golden Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    1,148
    Likes Received:
    372
    Wow good stuff man! First CPU I've been truly excited about since Sandy Bridge!
     
  7. Atreidin

    Atreidin Senior member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2011
    Messages:
    457
    Likes Received:
    25
    The L1 latency could be a hint that they are targeting high clocks. That's nothing solid, of course.
     
  8. cytg111

    cytg111 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    3,047
    Likes Received:
    162
    Nice job. uOp cache is new to AMD archs is it not?
     
    NicolasCC likes this.
  9. swilli89

    swilli89 Golden Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    1,148
    Likes Received:
    372
    This is a good point.. If they came with a 4 core Zen @ 4ghz base and the claimed 40% IPC improvement it would be a game changer. For gamers, we have long been at the point of saturation, since Sandy Bridge. You would NOT feel a difference sitting at two beige boxes, one running a 2500K and one running a 6600K in pretty much any game.

    However knowing AMD, hopefully they bring this performance to a 6-core @ $200 and shake up the market.
     
    NicolasCC likes this.
  10. myocardia

    myocardia Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2003
    Messages:
    9,223
    Likes Received:
    0
    I had also hoped that. Do we have any reason(s) so far to think that they did not use Seamico's technology, or at least base their new fabric on Seamicro's tech?
     
  11. Dresdenboy

    Dresdenboy Golden Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2003
    Messages:
    1,687
    Likes Received:
    455
    Right, of course, there will be SeaMicro IP in there. So this could be a mix with the best of all these worlds. One SeaMicro influence can be seen in some patents, where AMD describes a slot based server board with a torus like data fabric. And for many cores on a chip they're also going to use a torus topology.
     
  12. Dresdenboy

    Dresdenboy Golden Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2003
    Messages:
    1,687
    Likes Received:
    455
    I had the same thoughts. There are many more hints that they won't aim for some med/low clocks. FinFET also helps a lot here.

    Yep, it is.
     
  13. Arachnotronic

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    10,327
    Likes Received:
    780
    Lol, this reminds me of what the AMD fans were saying on the eve of the Derpdozer launch.
     
  14. cytg111

    cytg111 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    3,047
    Likes Received:
    162
    Value added : Zero.
    Much like this post. Ill go report us both now. Later.
     
  15. NTMBK

    NTMBK Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2011
    Messages:
    7,270
    Likes Received:
    169
    Thanks for this, Dresdenboy! Looking forward to seeing some Zen benchmarks at the end of the year.
     
    NicolasCC likes this.
  16. NTMBK

    NTMBK Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2011
    Messages:
    7,270
    Likes Received:
    169
    Adding a healthy pinch of salt is adding value in my eyes ;) Let's not get too hyped before we actually see some benches.
     
  17. Arachnotronic

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    10,327
    Likes Received:
    780
    It is a fact -- before BD launched, these forums were buzzing with claims that AMD was going to kick SNB into the stone age with 8 cores, more IPC than Phenom II, etc. Your join date is 2008, so I am sure you saw all of the internet buzz around Bulldozer, too.

    That hype led to a lot of disappointment/angst, particularly among those who held off on buying SNB because they were told to "wait for Bulldozer."

    Zen might be different, but to borrow the words of swilli89, "knowing AMD" it'll under-perform comparable Intel parts. Past performance is the best indicator of future performance and AMD has a lot to prove in CPUs.
     
  18. Sweepr

    Sweepr Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    4,804
    Likes Received:
    686
    There's nothing wrong with his post, stop being overly sensitive about any criticism towards AMD. Whether you like it or not, claiming they will sell a 6C/12T CPU with competitive IPC/clocks at $200 sounds way too optimistic.
     
  19. cytg111

    cytg111 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    3,047
    Likes Received:
    162
    A pinch, sure, but truckload? At every turn? No thanks.
    This common behavioral group dynamics of ganging up on one individual or minority exposes, imo, some pretty substandard characteristic properties of some of our fellow members. I believe this board have had enough of it so I report away.. If enough besides me do it, maybe things will change.

    (see, crowding up as I type)
     
    #18 cytg111, Mar 1, 2016
    Last edited: Mar 1, 2016
  20. Arachnotronic

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    10,327
    Likes Received:
    780
    In other words, even when a poster does not violate the ToS, you report them anyway because you don't like their opinions? Okay.
     
  21. Arachnotronic

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    10,327
    Likes Received:
    780
    If AMD has a 6C/12T winner like that, they should not charge just $200 for it. They could easily sell it for $400+ and there would be a lot of people who would gladly pay.

    Anyway, it's interesting to see the hype around Zen. It is very easy to make an unreleased chip seem like anything you want it to be, especially when you are comparing it to chips that are in the here and now.
     
  22. frozentundra123456

    frozentundra123456 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    Messages:
    9,467
    Likes Received:
    229
    How would a quad with a even with a 40% IPC increase at 4ghz be a game changer? We already have that in Skylake, probably even Haswell. If you cant tell any difference between SB and skylake, you could not tell any difference with this mythical quad with a 40% IPC increase either. And if you believe AMD will bring a competitive hex core at 200.00, well, I have some land you might wish to look at. Even AMD's marketing is not that inept.
     
  23. Arachnotronic

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Messages:
    10,327
    Likes Received:
    780

    40% IPC increase from XV is about Haswell level. This kind of performance has been "buyable" since 2014 with the launch of HSW-E 6C/12T for under $400 as long as you're willing to overclock.

    I love how when Intel provides a certain level of performance/functionality, they are accused of screwing customers, but if AMD is able to provide it, it's a "game changer" and "most exciting architecture in the history of ever."
     
  24. MrTeal

    MrTeal Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2003
    Messages:
    2,451
    Likes Received:
    39
    It's not about whether or not you could have bought HSW-E performance for the last 18 months anyway. It's that AMD is going to be selling 8 core Haswell-E levels of performance in the same $100-$200 range as the current octo-core FX processors. I don't recall the exact quote, but I think Lisa Su herself said something along the lines of "AMD cherishes its history as a value leader, and seeks to continue being a budget brand going forward." It was something like that, at least.
     
  25. ShintaiDK

    ShintaiDK Lifer

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    20,392
    Likes Received:
    120
    I thought she said she was done being the discount brand.
     
  26. cytg111

    cytg111 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    3,047
    Likes Received:
    162
    For disturbing the peace. Yea sure.
    What, you see it as your sacred duty to keep it real so you sprinkle some anti-amd-fan rhetoric around when a poster steps over the line (guesstimating Zen performance and pricepoint)? Thank god we have you to smack the "keeping-it-real" hammer down.

    insulting other members is not allowed
    Markfw900
     
    #25 cytg111, Mar 1, 2016
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 1, 2016