Too bad Frum doesn't recognize how broadly his error here applies to his positions. He recognizes he was wrong after 100 blows to the head by a 2 by 4 of the facts of gay marriage after it happened - after he fought to prevent it - proving him wrong. No recognition of WHY he was wrong. The word 'bigotry' does not appear in his comments - except being implied as something he was guilty of but doesn't understand he was.
I'm a big fan of people who are wrong being supported to grow out of that.
I'm not such a big fan of media figures being overly rewarded for having been wrong and very selectively correcting it.
It's a little like watching, say, a former rapist make a ton of money talking about how much he realizes he was wrong. There are a lot of people who never raped who might be better listened to and given the rewards of media attention. Frum only has this national platform because of the artificially bought and paid for right-wing media industry, largely for having been the speechwriter for a guy who stole the presidency; his books sold to a right-wing market built up with subsidies.
It's a bit like the sales of David Brock's hack job against Anita Hill or any of the other hack jobs in that market the difference being David Brock came to admit he was making money from hack jobs from a bought and paid for industry, while Frum has not. A point I made to David Frum in person, and he was basically oblivious. I asked him if he'd recognized the same things about how corrupt the right-wing media industry is as Brock had - with a clear implication that he was the same sort of propagandist Brock had been.
He reacted with confusion, and just saying no, he had not. Well, he's closer to recognizing the problems with the right-wing propaganda in that industry on one issue.
Whoop de do. I applaud his progress on the issue, but it doesn't change him being a very harmful figure who makes the same mistake on other issues.
Frum's the author of the book highly praising Bush as a great president, "The Right Man". It's a good reflection of how helpful he is in the political media.
While it's tempting to repeat the positive about Frum's progress on one issue, it's worth noting that he says he's not a Christian - something awkward for him when apparently all staff like him were expected to attend bible study in the Bush White House - and just as Brock bring gay was important to his progress recognizing the right was wrong, it may have helped Frum question this issue as well.
Many Christians support gay marriage - but not so many on the ideological right. It's hard to think of many who have progressed as Frum finally, after over a decade watching his views proven wrong by gay marriage becoming legal and going fine by his own admission, did.