• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

New World record in super PI

opened in IE for me but literally took 10 minutes. Its actually not finished loading the whole thing yet.
 
Originally posted by: Intelia
I just went to the link took all of 5 seconds
I do have an Intel cpu that mite explain it.

Nope, my hopless AMD Athlon XP 1700+ running at a mere 1.47 ghz opened it in 5 seconds too.

Guess that blows your cpu out of your water cooling.

1M superpi.... 18.5 seconds. At least they could use a real test.
 
Relax I was just kidding around. 1 month ago I posted the AMD setting the super pi record everyone thought it was great.
 
I didnt, its not sustainable cooling.

The "OMG HE RAN SUPERPI FOR 15 MINUTES ON $500 of LN2!" overclocks are just stupid in my opinion.

While i do envy cascade systems, most overclockers that use them also do "suicide" benching.

Im far more interested in 5ghz Dual core pentium 4s that can run 24/7 than an FX57 at 3.5ghz for 10 minutes.
 
Originally posted by: Acanthus
I didnt, its not sustainable cooling.

The "OMG HE RAN SUPERPI FOR 15 MINUTES ON $500 of LN2!" overclocks are just stupid in my opinion.

While i do envy cascade systems, most overclockers that use them also do "suicide" benching.

Im far more interested in 5ghz Dual core pentium 4s that can run 24/7 than an FX57 at 3.5ghz for 10 minutes.

'cause 5GHz dual cores P4's are possible. Sh1t. If you could show me one of those running 24/7, I'd buy one.
 
I agree with you but these guys work hard to get these things running at that speed. Give them credit and a big bank book.
 
My husband isn't A AMD fan but he thinks he can get an AMD to run 24/7 @3.4 on water and a chiller I won't doubt him at all on that. FX57

His 4.3 ran a 24/7 Intel P4C
 
Originally posted by: Intelia
I just went to the link took all of 5 seconds
I do have an Intel cpu that mite explain it.

thats weird... I'm at work, right now on a 3GHz Intel.
 
Originally posted by: JBT
Originally posted by: Intelia
I just went to the link took all of 5 seconds
I do have an Intel cpu that mite explain it.

thats weird... I'm at work, right now on a 3GHz Intel.

Well their you go I am suppose to be working but I am on this 3.2 Intel see what 200 Hz can do for ya!
 
Originally posted by: Intelia
Originally posted by: JBT
Originally posted by: Intelia
I just went to the link took all of 5 seconds
I do have an Intel cpu that mite explain it.

thats weird... I'm at work, right now on a 3GHz Intel.

Well their you go I am suppose to be working but I am on this 3.2 Intel see what 200 Hz can do for ya!

wups I just check I DO have a 3.2GHz... I wonder what could be wrong? Maybe it doesn't have anything to do with the CPU for this webpage. Any guesses?
 
opened in firefox, opened in explorer through (open link target in IE) firefox, seems fine, I know amd cpus run firefox faster but honestly your not going to be able to tell the difference between cpus in rendering webpages
 
Back
Top