New Ipod shuffle is NOT the world's smallest mp3 player!

[Narse]

Originally posted by: FreshPrince

Originally posted by: tfinch2

Originally posted by: FreshPrince

Originally posted by: Amused
FreshPrince,

Dude, you're beat. Just capitulate and go on with your life.

Size is measured by volume. It's this way with everything from cars, to houses, to washing machines, to refrigerators.

And no, I don't own an iPod nor am I an Apple fan... I just know when someone is owned. And right now you've not only been owned, you continue to own yourself.

no, size is measure by dimension. why? because we want to know if it will actually FIT into something. wider cars - can't fit into a narrow garrage. a wide ranch house can't fit into a smaller space that a narrow 2 story house can. taller regridgerators can't fit into shorter spaces, but it may be thinner in depth and smaller in volume. That is how everything that has to do with size works. volume means nothing, how the product fits into everyday use is key.

I accept that the shuffle will fit much more comfortably in jeans, but it's still not smaller when you want to store it somewhere.

I have not been owned.

<billymadison>Mr. FreshPrice, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.</billymadison>

yes, I'm the moron based on total volume.

Let's say you move into a new house and this weekend your wife charges you with purchasing a new fridge. you measure the dimensions of the "volume" space where you want to put it. It is 3' wide, 5' tall, and 3' deep. So based on your "logic", you say I need to get a fridge that is less than 45' cubic. Now, you go to the store and measure a fridge that is 3' wide, 6' tall, and 2' deep which equals 36' cubic and you immediately buy it because it is smaller than 45' cubic. the store delivers it and your wife kicks your ass because the new fridge is obviously too tall. your answer will be "but but but, it has a smaller volume, therefore it's smaller?" You also point her to this thread and proceed to "own" her and tell her that she's wrong, the new fridge is "smaller" than the space and it should fit. right?

wrong! I'm not owned.

Yes you are wrong!!! Let my try an explain why you are wrong. You said that the new shuffle is not smaller than the BLU payer, but when you compare 2 things that have differant dimensions the only way to compare them is Volume!!! and the shuffle is less volume than the Blu!!

OWNED

 

[BigJ]

Originally posted by: Narse

Originally posted by: FreshPrince

Originally posted by: tfinch2

Originally posted by: FreshPrince

Originally posted by: Amused
FreshPrince,

Dude, you're beat. Just capitulate and go on with your life.

Size is measured by volume. It's this way with everything from cars, to houses, to washing machines, to refrigerators.

And no, I don't own an iPod nor am I an Apple fan... I just know when someone is owned. And right now you've not only been owned, you continue to own yourself.

no, size is measure by dimension. why? because we want to know if it will actually FIT into something. wider cars - can't fit into a narrow garrage. a wide ranch house can't fit into a smaller space that a narrow 2 story house can. taller regridgerators can't fit into shorter spaces, but it may be thinner in depth and smaller in volume. That is how everything that has to do with size works. volume means nothing, how the product fits into everyday use is key.

I accept that the shuffle will fit much more comfortably in jeans, but it's still not smaller when you want to store it somewhere.

I have not been owned.

<billymadison>Mr. FreshPrice, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.</billymadison>

yes, I'm the moron based on total volume.

Let's say you move into a new house and this weekend your wife charges you with purchasing a new fridge. you measure the dimensions of the "volume" space where you want to put it. It is 3' wide, 5' tall, and 3' deep. So based on your "logic", you say I need to get a fridge that is less than 45' cubic. Now, you go to the store and measure a fridge that is 3' wide, 6' tall, and 2' deep which equals 36' cubic and you immediately buy it because it is smaller than 45' cubic. the store delivers it and your wife kicks your ass because the new fridge is obviously too tall. your answer will be "but but but, it has a smaller volume, therefore it's smaller?" You also point her to this thread and proceed to "own" her and tell her that she's wrong, the new fridge is "smaller" than the space and it should fit. right?

wrong! I'm not owned.

Yes you are wrong!!! Let my try an explain why you are wrong. You said that the new shuffle is not smaller than the BLU payer, but when you compare 2 things that have differant dimensions the only way to compare them is Volume!!! and the shuffle is less volume than the Blu!!

OWNED

I said this in two posts, even called him out to specifically answer that question, and he still hasn't responded.

He's so silly.

What will fit is subjective. Volume is not.

 

[waggy]

Originally posted by: FreshPrince

Originally posted by: tfinch2

Originally posted by: FreshPrince

Originally posted by: Amused
FreshPrince,

Dude, you're beat. Just capitulate and go on with your life.

Size is measured by volume. It's this way with everything from cars, to houses, to washing machines, to refrigerators.

And no, I don't own an iPod nor am I an Apple fan... I just know when someone is owned. And right now you've not only been owned, you continue to own yourself.

no, size is measure by dimension. why? because we want to know if it will actually FIT into something. wider cars - can't fit into a narrow garrage. a wide ranch house can't fit into a smaller space that a narrow 2 story house can. taller regridgerators can't fit into shorter spaces, but it may be thinner in depth and smaller in volume. That is how everything that has to do with size works. volume means nothing, how the product fits into everyday use is key.

I accept that the shuffle will fit much more comfortably in jeans, but it's still not smaller when you want to store it somewhere.

I have not been owned.

<billymadison>Mr. FreshPrice, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.</billymadison>

yes, I'm the moron based on total volume.

Let's say you move into a new house and this weekend your wife charges you with purchasing a new fridge. you measure the dimensions of the "volume" space where you want to put it. It is 3' wide, 5' tall, and 3' deep. So based on your "logic", you say I need to get a fridge that is less than 45' cubic. Now, you go to the store and measure a fridge that is 3' wide, 6' tall, and 2' deep which equals 36' cubic and you immediately buy it because it is smaller than 45' cubic. the store delivers it and your wife kicks your ass because the new fridge is obviously too tall. your answer will be "but but but, it has a smaller volume, therefore it's smaller?" You also point her to this thread and proceed to "own" her and tell her that she's wrong, the new fridge is "smaller" than the space and it should fit. right?

wrong! I'm not owned.

man you just do not get it.


but hey can you link me that fridge you are talking about? considering most are standard sizes.

 

[HopJokey]

FreshPrince,

Regardless of what your definition of "smaller" is, you are wrong on the account of saying that Apple has lied about saying the iPod Shuffle is the smallest mp3 player. They have not lied and their claim is accurate by measuring volume. It may not be the "smallest" by measuring the largest dimension of the object as you claim, but by volume (accepted by many) Apple's claim of smallest is correct.

I am not going to argue with your viewpoint of what it means to be "smallest" as everyone has an opinion, but you must respect Apple's definition of "smallest" (total volume) which is a valid one. If still, you only believe there can be one definition of "smallest" and that it be your own, you should sue Apple and take them to court for false Advertisement.

-HopJokey

 

[tfinch2]

Originally posted by: FreshPrince

Originally posted by: tfinch2

Originally posted by: FreshPrince

Originally posted by: Amused
FreshPrince,

Dude, you're beat. Just capitulate and go on with your life.

Size is measured by volume. It's this way with everything from cars, to houses, to washing machines, to refrigerators.

And no, I don't own an iPod nor am I an Apple fan... I just know when someone is owned. And right now you've not only been owned, you continue to own yourself.

no, size is measure by dimension. why? because we want to know if it will actually FIT into something. wider cars - can't fit into a narrow garrage. a wide ranch house can't fit into a smaller space that a narrow 2 story house can. taller regridgerators can't fit into shorter spaces, but it may be thinner in depth and smaller in volume. That is how everything that has to do with size works. volume means nothing, how the product fits into everyday use is key.

I accept that the shuffle will fit much more comfortably in jeans, but it's still not smaller when you want to store it somewhere.

I have not been owned.

<billymadison>Mr. FreshPrice, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.</billymadison>

yes, I'm the moron based on total volume.

Let's say you move into a new house and this weekend your wife charges you with purchasing a new fridge. you measure the dimensions of the "volume" space where you want to put it. It is 3' wide, 5' tall, and 3' deep. So based on your "logic", you say I need to get a fridge that is less than 45' cubic. Now, you go to the store and measure a fridge that is 3' wide, 6' tall, and 2' deep which equals 36' cubic and you immediately buy it because it is smaller than 45' cubic. the store delivers it and your wife kicks your ass because the new fridge is obviously too tall. your answer will be "but but but, it has a smaller volume, therefore it's smaller?" You also point her to this thread and proceed to "own" her and tell her that she's wrong, the new fridge is "smaller" than the space and it should fit. right?

wrong! I'm not owned.

Way to compare apples to refridgerators :roll: but on that point...

You point proves this one as well. Your pocket is not shaped like a cube, it is flat. Therefore you'd rather have a flat player like the dimensions of the shuffle rather than a bulky cube.

Gonna work out? Let me strap this stupid cube to my arm. :roll:

 

[FreshPrince]

Originally posted by: HopJokey
FreshPrince,

Regardless of what your definition of "smaller" is, you are wrong on the account of saying that Apple has lied about saying the iPod Shuffle is the smallest mp3 player. They have not lied and their claim is accurate by measuring volume. It may not be the "smallest" by measuring the largest dimension of the object as you claim, but by volume (accepted by many) Apple's claim of smallest is correct.

I am not going to argue with your viewpoint of what it means to be "smallest" as everyone has an opinion, but you must respect Apple's definition of "smallest" (total volume) which is a valid one. If still, you only believe there can be one definition of "smallest" and that it be your own, you should sue Apple and take them to court for false Advertisement.

-HopJokey

nah, Apple isn't worth suing.

I do appreciate that you realize my viewpoint, be it that it differs from the masses. I do respect Apple's claim to volume, if it is in fact what they were trying to do. Afterall, they didn't say on their website it is the smallest in volume, just the smallest, which is my view, is incorrect.

 

[FreshPrince]

Originally posted by: tfinch2

Originally posted by: FreshPrince

Originally posted by: tfinch2

Originally posted by: FreshPrince

Originally posted by: Amused
FreshPrince,

Dude, you're beat. Just capitulate and go on with your life.

Size is measured by volume. It's this way with everything from cars, to houses, to washing machines, to refrigerators.

And no, I don't own an iPod nor am I an Apple fan... I just know when someone is owned. And right now you've not only been owned, you continue to own yourself.

no, size is measure by dimension. why? because we want to know if it will actually FIT into something. wider cars - can't fit into a narrow garrage. a wide ranch house can't fit into a smaller space that a narrow 2 story house can. taller regridgerators can't fit into shorter spaces, but it may be thinner in depth and smaller in volume. That is how everything that has to do with size works. volume means nothing, how the product fits into everyday use is key.

I accept that the shuffle will fit much more comfortably in jeans, but it's still not smaller when you want to store it somewhere.

I have not been owned.

<billymadison>Mr. FreshPrice, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.</billymadison>

yes, I'm the moron based on total volume.

Let's say you move into a new house and this weekend your wife charges you with purchasing a new fridge. you measure the dimensions of the "volume" space where you want to put it. It is 3' wide, 5' tall, and 3' deep. So based on your "logic", you say I need to get a fridge that is less than 45' cubic. Now, you go to the store and measure a fridge that is 3' wide, 6' tall, and 2' deep which equals 36' cubic and you immediately buy it because it is smaller than 45' cubic. the store delivers it and your wife kicks your ass because the new fridge is obviously too tall. your answer will be "but but but, it has a smaller volume, therefore it's smaller?" You also point her to this thread and proceed to "own" her and tell her that she's wrong, the new fridge is "smaller" than the space and it should fit. right?

wrong! I'm not owned.

Way to compare apples to refridgerators :roll: but on that point...

You point proves this one as well. Your pocket is not shaped like a cube, it is flat. Therefore you'd rather have a flat player like the dimensions of the shuffle rather than a bulky cube.

Gonna work out? Let me strap this stupid cube to my arm. :roll:

ok stop, did I say the new shuffle is shaped badly for workouts? no, in fact, I said I may get one. yes, I get it fits better in a pocket, but in my view, it's still not the smallest because it doesn't fit everywhere. in order to be the smallest, in my mind, it would have to be able to fit into anywhere the 2nd smallest player can and even smaller spaces. That in my definition, is the smallest.

 

[Baked]

New Shuffle looks way cooler than the cube thingy. /thread

 

[BigJ]

Originally posted by: FreshPrince

Originally posted by: tfinch2

Originally posted by: FreshPrince

Originally posted by: tfinch2

Originally posted by: FreshPrince

Originally posted by: Amused
FreshPrince,

Dude, you're beat. Just capitulate and go on with your life.

Size is measured by volume. It's this way with everything from cars, to houses, to washing machines, to refrigerators.

And no, I don't own an iPod nor am I an Apple fan... I just know when someone is owned. And right now you've not only been owned, you continue to own yourself.

no, size is measure by dimension. why? because we want to know if it will actually FIT into something. wider cars - can't fit into a narrow garrage. a wide ranch house can't fit into a smaller space that a narrow 2 story house can. taller regridgerators can't fit into shorter spaces, but it may be thinner in depth and smaller in volume. That is how everything that has to do with size works. volume means nothing, how the product fits into everyday use is key.

I accept that the shuffle will fit much more comfortably in jeans, but it's still not smaller when you want to store it somewhere.

I have not been owned.

<billymadison>Mr. FreshPrice, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.</billymadison>

yes, I'm the moron based on total volume.

Let's say you move into a new house and this weekend your wife charges you with purchasing a new fridge. you measure the dimensions of the "volume" space where you want to put it. It is 3' wide, 5' tall, and 3' deep. So based on your "logic", you say I need to get a fridge that is less than 45' cubic. Now, you go to the store and measure a fridge that is 3' wide, 6' tall, and 2' deep which equals 36' cubic and you immediately buy it because it is smaller than 45' cubic. the store delivers it and your wife kicks your ass because the new fridge is obviously too tall. your answer will be "but but but, it has a smaller volume, therefore it's smaller?" You also point her to this thread and proceed to "own" her and tell her that she's wrong, the new fridge is "smaller" than the space and it should fit. right?

wrong! I'm not owned.

Way to compare apples to refridgerators :roll: but on that point...

You point proves this one as well. Your pocket is not shaped like a cube, it is flat. Therefore you'd rather have a flat player like the dimensions of the shuffle rather than a bulky cube.

Gonna work out? Let me strap this stupid cube to my arm. :roll:

ok stop, did I say the new shuffle is shaped badly for workouts? no, in fact, I said I may get one. yes, I get it fits better in a pocket, but in my view, it's still not the smallest because it doesn't fit everywhere. in order to be the smallest, in my mind, it would have to be able to fit into anywhere the 2nd smallest player can and even smaller spaces. That in my definition, is the smallest.

Then the cube doesn't even fit your own definition of smallest!

 

[tfinch2]

Originally posted by: FreshPrince

Originally posted by: tfinch2

Originally posted by: FreshPrince

Originally posted by: tfinch2

Originally posted by: FreshPrince

Originally posted by: Amused
FreshPrince,

Dude, you're beat. Just capitulate and go on with your life.

Size is measured by volume. It's this way with everything from cars, to houses, to washing machines, to refrigerators.

And no, I don't own an iPod nor am I an Apple fan... I just know when someone is owned. And right now you've not only been owned, you continue to own yourself.

no, size is measure by dimension. why? because we want to know if it will actually FIT into something. wider cars - can't fit into a narrow garrage. a wide ranch house can't fit into a smaller space that a narrow 2 story house can. taller regridgerators can't fit into shorter spaces, but it may be thinner in depth and smaller in volume. That is how everything that has to do with size works. volume means nothing, how the product fits into everyday use is key.

I accept that the shuffle will fit much more comfortably in jeans, but it's still not smaller when you want to store it somewhere.

I have not been owned.

<billymadison>Mr. FreshPrice, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.</billymadison>

yes, I'm the moron based on total volume.

Let's say you move into a new house and this weekend your wife charges you with purchasing a new fridge. you measure the dimensions of the "volume" space where you want to put it. It is 3' wide, 5' tall, and 3' deep. So based on your "logic", you say I need to get a fridge that is less than 45' cubic. Now, you go to the store and measure a fridge that is 3' wide, 6' tall, and 2' deep which equals 36' cubic and you immediately buy it because it is smaller than 45' cubic. the store delivers it and your wife kicks your ass because the new fridge is obviously too tall. your answer will be "but but but, it has a smaller volume, therefore it's smaller?" You also point her to this thread and proceed to "own" her and tell her that she's wrong, the new fridge is "smaller" than the space and it should fit. right?

wrong! I'm not owned.

Way to compare apples to refridgerators :roll: but on that point...

You point proves this one as well. Your pocket is not shaped like a cube, it is flat. Therefore you'd rather have a flat player like the dimensions of the shuffle rather than a bulky cube.

Gonna work out? Let me strap this stupid cube to my arm. :roll:

ok stop, did I say the new shuffle is shaped badly for workouts? no, in fact, I said I may get one. yes, I get it fits better in a pocket, but in my view, it's still not the smallest because it doesn't fit everywhere. in order to be the smallest, in my mind, it would have to be able to fit into anywhere the 2nd smallest player can and even smaller spaces. That in my definition, is the smallest.

Where else does it need to fit? Oh yeah, I have a .95"x.95"x.95" cube space cut out in my living room wall. The smallest player that will fit in there is the mobiblu cube, therefore it must be the smallest!

Well that definition is fvcking stupid plain and simple. Are you studying for a career in pathological science?

 

[JujuFish]

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: Sable
Self ownage FTW. :laugh:

yeah the ownage on the OP is great. but damn the ownage on FreshPrince is even better. how sad that he does not get what everyone else is saying.

FreshPrince IS the OP. You just owned yourself.

 

[JujuFish]

Originally posted by: FreshPrince
ok stop, did I say the new shuffle is shaped badly for workouts? no, in fact, I said I may get one. yes, I get it fits better in a pocket, but in my view, it's still not the smallest because it doesn't fit everywhere. in order to be the smallest, in my mind, it would have to be able to fit into anywhere the 2nd smallest player can and even smaller spaces. That in my definition, is the smallest.

And how do you define whether or not one space is smaller than another?

 

[RapidSnail]

Originally posted by: FreshPrince

Originally posted by: tfinch2

Originally posted by: FreshPrince

Originally posted by: tfinch2

Originally posted by: FreshPrince

Originally posted by: Amused
FreshPrince,

Dude, you're beat. Just capitulate and go on with your life.

Size is measured by volume. It's this way with everything from cars, to houses, to washing machines, to refrigerators.

And no, I don't own an iPod nor am I an Apple fan... I just know when someone is owned. And right now you've not only been owned, you continue to own yourself.

no, size is measure by dimension. why? because we want to know if it will actually FIT into something. wider cars - can't fit into a narrow garrage. a wide ranch house can't fit into a smaller space that a narrow 2 story house can. taller regridgerators can't fit into shorter spaces, but it may be thinner in depth and smaller in volume. That is how everything that has to do with size works. volume means nothing, how the product fits into everyday use is key.

I accept that the shuffle will fit much more comfortably in jeans, but it's still not smaller when you want to store it somewhere.

I have not been owned.

<billymadison>Mr. FreshPrice, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.</billymadison>

yes, I'm the moron based on total volume.

Let's say you move into a new house and this weekend your wife charges you with purchasing a new fridge. you measure the dimensions of the "volume" space where you want to put it. It is 3' wide, 5' tall, and 3' deep. So based on your "logic", you say I need to get a fridge that is less than 45' cubic. Now, you go to the store and measure a fridge that is 3' wide, 6' tall, and 2' deep which equals 36' cubic and you immediately buy it because it is smaller than 45' cubic. the store delivers it and your wife kicks your ass because the new fridge is obviously too tall. your answer will be "but but but, it has a smaller volume, therefore it's smaller?" You also point her to this thread and proceed to "own" her and tell her that she's wrong, the new fridge is "smaller" than the space and it should fit. right?

wrong! I'm not owned.

Way to compare apples to refridgerators :roll: but on that point...

You point proves this one as well. Your pocket is not shaped like a cube, it is flat. Therefore you'd rather have a flat player like the dimensions of the shuffle rather than a bulky cube.

Gonna work out? Let me strap this stupid cube to my arm. :roll:

ok stop, did I say the new shuffle is shaped badly for workouts? no, in fact, I said I may get one. yes, I get it fits better in a pocket, but in my view, it's still not the smallest because it doesn't fit everywhere. in order to be the smallest, in my mind, it would have to be able to fit into anywhere the 2nd smallest player can and even smaller spaces. That in my definition, is the smallest.

The mobiBLU doesn't fit everywhere.

The mobiBLU can't fit anywhere the second smallest player [Shuffle] can and even smaller spaces.


Small/est

1. of limited size; of comparatively restricted dimensions; not big; little: a small box.
2. slender, thin, or narrow: a small waist.


Size

1. the spatial dimensions, proportions, magnitude, or bulk of anything: the size of a farm; the size of the fish you caught.


Dimension/s

2a. measurement in length, width, and thickness [volume].

 

[Don Vito Corleone]

Originally posted by: Tom

Smallness can't be defined by some arbitrary container. I could propose a container the Ipod would fit in and the mobilu wouldn't fit in. It's meaningless to define "smallest" that way.

Take a container that is 3/4 inch thick by 4 feet by 8 feet. Could I could prove that a 1/2 inch thick sheet of plywood is smaller than a mobilu because the plywood would fit and the mobilu wouldn't ?

This is the best post in this priceless thread, other than the sheer comic value of the OP's ridiculous defenses.

 

[ElFenix]

freshprince should just give up.


any time someone gets owned, but refuses to give up, it should be called freshprinced. or shuffled. or something. maybe SP33Demon'd.

 

[tfinch2]

Originally posted by: ElFenix
freshprince should just give up.


any time someone gets owned, but refuses to give up, it should be called freshprinced. or shuffled. or something. maybe SP33Demon'd.

You've been cubed.

 

[waggy]

Originally posted by: JujuFish

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: Sable
Self ownage FTW. :laugh:

yeah the ownage on the OP is great. but damn the ownage on FreshPrince is even better. how sad that he does not get what everyone else is saying.

FreshPrince IS the OP. You just owned yourself.

wonderd how long it would take..

 

[Epic Fail]

Originally posted by: ta8689

Originally posted by: GeNome
I'm sorry, but I would never own an $80 peice of equipment that could easily get flushed down the toilet.

First, why would you put an mp3 player in a toilet? And second, if your just going to reply because its so small, how big do you think the processor in your computer is? And how much did you pay for that? I dont think youll be puting that in the toilet either.

read a few posts up and you will find the answer:

Originally posted by: Estrella
as long as i can fit it comfortably in my anus

 

[JujuFish]

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: JujuFish

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: Sable
Self ownage FTW. :laugh:

yeah the ownage on the OP is great. but damn the ownage on FreshPrince is even better. how sad that he does not get what everyone else is saying.

FreshPrince IS the OP. You just owned yourself.

wonderd how long it would take..

I was a bit surprised no one called you on it. With about 50 more posts beyond that I thought for sure someone would have. :evil:

 

[mpitts]

Math dorks, answer this question:

You have an empty 3' x 3' box. Would it hold more Apple iPod Shuffle's (1.67" x 1.04" x .41") or MobilBLU cubes (.94" x .94" x .94")?

 

[Epic Fail]

Originally posted by: mpitts
Math dorks, answer this question:

You have an empty 3' x 3' box. Would it hold more Apple iPod Shuffle's (1.67" x 1.04" x .41") or MobilBLU cubes (.94" x .94" x .94")?

Trick question, this isn't a box!

 

[waggy]

Originally posted by: JujuFish

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: JujuFish

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: Sable
Self ownage FTW. :laugh:

yeah the ownage on the OP is great. but damn the ownage on FreshPrince is even better. how sad that he does not get what everyone else is saying.

FreshPrince IS the OP. You just owned yourself.

wonderd how long it would take..

I was a bit surprised no one called you on it. With about 50 more posts beyond that I thought for sure someone would have. :evil:

heh soon as i hit reply i figured it would be guick before someone called me on it.

pages later i figured nobody noticed! i was really suprised it took as long as it did.

 

[Fenixgoon]

the new shuffle is the smallest, PERIOD. the mobilBLU cubes are the smallest full featured mp3 players. or so their respective companies claim, anway

 

[tfinch2]

Originally posted by: mpitts
Math dorks, answer this question:

You have an empty 3' x 3' box. Would it hold more Apple iPod Shuffle's (1.67" x 1.04" x .41") or MobilBLU cubes (.94" x .94" x .94")?

It will hold more Shuffles, about 7200 more if I calculated correctly.

 

[jpeyton]

The OP has been thoroughly owned, but hasn't come to terms with it (as of the time of this post).

When comparing size, you compare the volume an object occupies. And even if you want to compare just one single dimension (like the OP does), why choose to compare width when you can equally choose to compare depth (where the Shuffle obviously wins)?