zinfamous
No Lifer
- Jul 12, 2006
- 111,858
- 31,346
- 146
Originally posted by: anxi80
as great as it is and part of the reason why i think these lists are horsesh*t is because one of the main criteria's is that it has to be an american film. great, its the american film institute but i still think its damaging its credibility by omitting some great foreign films. if that wasn't the case im sure leone and kurosawa would be kicking ass all over this list.Originally posted by: chuckywang
The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly is a major oversight.
I agree, but I have no beef with the AFI releasing their American-biased list (an extended qualifier of "Top 100 American films" would be nice...but I feel the implication is enough)
The international lists are always better, anyway. Raging Bull tends to be #1 (easily Scorsese's best, and well-deserved. Scorsese would have no problem that he tends to share that spot with 8 1/2, the Fellini fan that he is). Godfather is always up there, and Fellini, Kurosawa, Godard tend to get their standard top 10 nods. These are also voted on by critics and international commities.
Citizen Kane is generally top 5 too, and it's well-deserved (film has its own history, too)