Originally posted by: Idontcare
Core 2 Trio
I believe Intel will reserve the honors of incrementing the Core # from 2 to 3 for the successor to Nehalem-C (Westmere) which is currently codenamed
Sandy Bridge.
Are you serious? How would Core 2 Trio (as a name) be better than Core 2 Quad...which we have now? How is
that NOT confusing?
I think some of us might be forgetting that the post Pentium line started with Core (including Core Solo and Core Duo) and
then Core 2 (yes, I know Core was basically rebadged Pentium M and was pretty much exclusive to laptops, but it was still the successor to Core 2)... That being said I think Nehalem will definitely be Core 3 or something else...not Core 2.
I can understand the argument that Core 3 could be confusing, but Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad make things quite clear and so far haven't had much complaints... Core 3 Duo, Core 3 Quad and Core 3 Octo (or whatever we'll see for any other labeling terms) Should more than do the trick, I don't see how it's all that confusing...all other things being the same, Core 3 is better because 3 > 2...Core 3 Quad > Core 2 Quad, is there really someone who wouldn't get this?
If intel wants to really avoid confusion and really emphasize the new architecture they can always skip 3 and go straight to 4. Core 4 Quad (assuming quads really will be the new standard) would certainly take care of any confusion, and there'd be plenty of marketing play with stuff like,
"put some 'C4' in your system and watch your performance explode!" although maybe that would be as much of a problem considering those who are too serious
Originally posted by: TC91
Originally posted by: RallyMaster
Intel needs the Pentium name back for their higher end desktop lines.
maybe they will call it pentium 5
Won't happen, if it does it'd be extremely silly seeing as how Intel has already revived the Pentium brand (after saying they were retiring it) as a sort of midrange line positioned between Celeron and Core.
Originally posted by: ghost recon88
Me bets they won't even have "Core" in the name, seeing as how its an all new architecture, not just a die shrink like the Wolfdale/Yorkfield chips were.
So why no change during the Pentium days? Pentium 4 with its radical Netburst change certainly 'deserved' a change of name probably more so than anything else... (consider Core 2 being closer to Pentium 3 than Pentium 4 is...)
Intel dropped the Pentium name to shed itself of the poor image it had acquired while in its ending Netburst days and started the new line - Core - to give themselves a clean slate to work with in marketing terms, emphasizing performance per watt...and considering Intel's major success with the new line, I'd wager that Core is here to stay...at least until (or I guess if) it falters like Netburst did and thus ended the Pentium line (as their flagship brand - obviously Intel has since revived the Pentium brand name for use in a lower midrange line, but since this line isn't targeted as a flagship it doesn't need to have the cleanest/best reputation and the brand name was obviously too valuable to just throw away so they stuck it in a tier just above Celeron)