Originally posted by: KarenMarie
Responsibility to whom? To those who demand that he see it as they see it?
That was a poor choice of words on my part. My point was, he doesn't get a pass just because it's his body and he can do what he wants with it (as you suggested). He can do what he wants with his body, and other people can form their own opinions of him based on that and they can express those opinions as they please.
He's free to have "Death to all n!ggers" tattooed on his body if he wants, but you better believe people would tell him how they feel about that, as is their right. (I have no reason to believe the OP is a racist, I was merely offering that as an extreme example)
Perhaps it is only controversial to those who want the symbol to remain in the hands of the bigots. Perhaps the OP made a decision that he did not want to relinquish his views and beliefs in the symbol to those who have mistreated it. I agree with your opinion that the 10th amendement is a good choice for a tattoo... but the OP has a different opinion.
That's valid, but simply using the symbol does nothing to take it back from the bigots. Using it in a way that demonstrates its meaning to him does. I'm not really sure how you can do that, other than explaining the meaning to everyone who sees it.
But again, my point was that people are entitled to their own opinions on his choice of symbols.
And i cannot agree that he should be questioned, ridiculed and judged because he does not give in to those who see it as something different.
And yet everyone has the right to ridicule and judge him as they see fit, and you're welcome to judge them for judging him. It's not like he didn't know it was going to happen when he got the tattoo.
