Originally posted by: KarmaPolice
Originally posted by: Andyb23
Originally posted by: tweakmm
Originally posted by: Andyb23
Originally posted by: tweakmm
Originally posted by: Andyb23
It seems as if this is carrying on and Nintendo is not interested in keeping up. I mean the WII doesn't even have a DVD player and the new formats succeeding the DVD are coming out very quickly.
The Wii is defining a new market place. It's actually quite a brilliant strategy on Nintendo's part.
Nobody says "What of the 3 consoles do I want to get" it's "In addition to the Wii, do I want an Xbox or PS3"
Comparing the three systems as equals is not fair.
Thats an interesting way to put it, but I mean the core 360 is 299.99, only 50 bucks more than the Wii....
The core comes with what again? :laugh:
LOL, point taken
doesnt matter you still get a lot more with the system power wise..if you look at it from a hardware basis you get the better deal
the full xbox is not that expensive anymore either...
buy whatever you want but i think the xbox is the best right now.
Comparing the amount of power in a console vs. how much it costs is silly. All that matters is how much enjoyment you get back from you money. 360 still needs a better library of games. It was winning by default up until now - it's not really competing with the Wii, but in a year or so, the PS3 will probably be giving it some problems, if they can follow through and pull together their big franchises like FF, GT and MGS.
If they dropped the premium to $300, I'd prob pick one up though. If they ported XBMC over to it, not this hack media extender crap, that could natively play HD files, I'd buy one in a hot second. If there was ever a time MS should just suck it up and let the open source kids have at it, this is it. XBMC would be such a massive system seller.
Of the three consoles last generation, the PS2 was the least powerful I believe (which makes all of the Playstation fanboys' complaints about the underpowered Wii kind of ironic)
The PS2 was underpowered by a small margin, although AFAIK it had the highest floating point performance. Compared to the 360 and PS3, the Wii is underpowered by a mile.
But it's just so damn fun to play, I couldnt care less about the hardware inside.
I realised something, the notorious games that had graphics problems such as low FPS and artifacts are amde for consoles that were meant to take gaming to the bleeding edge (ie. PS2). Even though the Wii doesn't have that image, I'm afraid some devs will push it a little too far.
I guess basically, I'm kinda concerned that the console will have too much on its plate later this generation. Oh well I guess.
I doubt that will happen, because they won't try to compete on graphics in the first place. But a few years from now, once they really start to push the limits of the Wiimote, I'm sure we'll see some incredible stuff that the other systems just don't have the hardware to even try in the first place. It's already like that to a degree, but I'm sure itll be even more apparent in a year or two. I'd expect new Wii Sports editions to come out regularly. Wii hockey would be interesting.
