Mueller

[brycejones]

Followers of right-wing media remind me of followers of doomsday preachers.

Predictions and facts nearly consistently proved incorrect. Going through the history of Fox, Jones, etc shows well over a decade of utterly wrong propaganda.

From death panels to FEMA camps to martial law to Clinton death lists to a bad Obama economy to a conspiracy to hide unemployment... And the list could go on for days.

All easily proved wrong on the facts or by the test of time.

And yet... They keep watching.

Why?

Faith based projection.

They have absolute faith everyone is just as shitty as they are.

 

[zinfamous]

Putin loved Hillary, she's one of his enablers and an easy mark for him.

Huh? You really must reject all known history to believe such a blatant lie. LoL, you think Trump isn't thoroughly compromised by Putin? What a deplorable fool you are. Who holds the purse strings, idiot?

 

[zinfamous]

Oh and it gets better....

Uranium One informant makes Clinton allegations in testimony

ahahahahah, the desperation runs thick. Tagging back in with Uranium one, yet again, because the shit is piling up within.

Guess who isn't paying attention to this nonsense?

 

[imported_tajmahal]

Nice Alt Taj
I’ve asked before, when is she going to be charged? Your boys control everything right now, when can I expect her to be charged?
If she isn’t at least charged with a crime should I assume she is innocent or your boys are grossly incompetent which is it?

No alt, just me on one account. I don't cheat on my wife or in this forum. I may get a little off the rules at times, but I abide by them.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

Stop posting propaganda and use a neutral source.
https://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/facts-uranium-one/

Can you find me one?

 

[Fanatical Meat]

No alt, just me on one account. I don't cheat on my wife or in this forum. I may get a little off the rules at times, but I abide by them.

Good, when can I expect Hillary to be charged?

 

[imported_tajmahal]

Can't respond because i don't agree with your premises.

Trump supporters, I have a puzzle for you.

Two of you are suggesting that the Steele dossier (which was part of the basis for the Russia investigation) is a load of BS: completed unvetted, biased with partisan motives, to the point that they should not have been able to get a warrant and the fact that their investigation is based on it shows that the FBI are also biased to the point of loss of objectivity.

Cast your minds back to the day when Trump admitted on the record to obstructing justice: that he fired Comey to impede the Russia investigation: http://www.msnbc.com/am-joy/watch/trump-admits-comey-firing-related-to-russia-probe-943201347824

What followed was the appointment of Mueller as special counsel. Let me draw your attention to this quote from a conservative media source:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/0/former-fbi-director-robert-mueller-appointed-special-prosecutor/

and


First of all, Trump firing Comey: Do you think that his fellow Republicans either turned a blind eye to this, not bothering to even acquire a vague idea of what basis there might be for a connection between Trump and the Russia investigation as part of a check and balance to ensure that to the best of their knowledge and belief that Trump was not obstructing justice, then they would then do nothing as the investigation rolls on, then after the arrests come (being a sure-fire sign that there is some substance to the Russia investigation unless you honestly believe that a man who enjoyed bipartisan support for what must be the FBI's most important and high-profile investigation wouldn't pay sufficient attention to ensure his cases against each are watertight, because any mistake by the FBI in this investigation would cast further doubt on their competence and objectivity), then the Republicans start paying attention to the Russia investigation and decide that the dossier is BS?

Or do you believe that after Comey's dismissal by Trump, the Republicans did their jobs as they should by looking over the basis of the investigation, somehow decided that Trump wasn't guilty of obstruction of justice yet also decided that there is sufficient reason for the investigation to continue, then after the arrests come they then decide that the dossier is BS?

 

[imported_tajmahal]

Good, when can I expect Hillary to be charged?

Seriously, how would I know? As far as i'm concerned the sooner the better. I'd love to see dozens of subpoenas go out and members of the Obama administration, including Obama, testify under oath by a special prosecutor.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

Faith based projection.

They have absolute faith everyone is just as shitty as they are.

Have you guys read the Sportage thread on a coup?

 

[Jhhnn]

ahahahahah, the desperation runs thick. Tagging back in with Uranium one, yet again, because the shit is piling up within.

Guess who isn't paying attention to this nonsense?

It's totally lame conspiracy theory.

 

[Jhhnn]

Seriously, how would I know? As far as i'm concerned the sooner the better. I'd love to see dozens of subpoenas go out and members of the Obama administration, including Obama, testify under oath by a special prosecutor.

I'm sure you'd love that. OTOH, you don't have any facts to warrant such a course of action. Meanwhile, facts to the contrary are utterly overwhelming to anybody who has any resistance to conspiracy theory ideation at all.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Seriously, how would I know? As far as i'm concerned the sooner the better. I'd love to see dozens of subpoenas go out and members of the Obama administration, including Obama, testify under oath by a special prosecutor.

and if she doesn't get charged by your boys what does that mean?

 

[jackstar7]

Faith based projection.

They have absolute faith everyone is just as shitty as they are.

And we're back to Moonbeam territory.

 

[Jaskalas]

Why was a Russian operative sent to Trump tower

You referring to Don Jr's meeting with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya? She is connected to Fusion GPS, maybe you should ask Clinton given that she paid for Putin's involvement.

 

[hal2kilo]

And we're back to Moonbeam territory.

No, it's a pretty solid observation.

 

[bshole]

`

 

[Puffnstuff]

Can you find me one?

Confirmation bias runs strong in this one.

 

[jackstar7]

No, it's a pretty solid observation.

Ha. I don't think Moonbeam is wrong when it comes to these observations.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

You referring to Don Jr's meeting with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya? She is connected to Fusion GPS, maybe you should ask Clinton given that she paid for Putin's involvement.

So when is Hillary going to be charged? If she isn't charged what does that mean?
I'm suspicious of your claim but we'll put that aside. Trump Jr in an email sent by him said he is looking forward to getting dirt on Hillary from Russian operatives.

 

[cytg111]

You referring to Don Jr's meeting with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya? She is connected to Fusion GPS, maybe you should ask Clinton given that she paid for Putin's involvement.

- So Hillary Clinton is Putins secret gay lover and they destroyed the child, DNC behind 9/11. Check. What else is new today on infowars today?

 

[Jhhnn]

You referring to Don Jr's meeting with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya? She is connected to Fusion GPS, maybe you should ask Clinton given that she paid for Putin's involvement.

How did Clinton pay for Putin's involvement?

This is gonna be good, I can tell. A real humdinger!

 

[Puffnstuff]

What else is new today on infowars?

Just some reruns.

 

[mikeymikec]

Can't respond because i don't agree with your premises.

So how would you characterise Trump's admission, particularly in the light of 3+ people in the Trump campaign / administration arrested so far in the investigation?

 

[Younigue]

So how would you characterise Trump's admission, particularly in the light of 3+ people in the Trump campaign / administration arrested so far in the investigation?

Trump never ever says anything he means or says anything that means anything? Trump's a God, leave him alone! That Effer is moments away for making it legal for me to throw grenades at children!

△△△
That's my bet on what his answer will be.

 

[dyna]

The Nunes memo again verified that the Steele Dossier is not the source used to grant the FISA warrant against neo-nazi Carter Page (pretty much tarnishes little Donny's primary argument, doesn't it?).

Further, the memo clarified that many of the details in the Steele Dossier had been independently corroborated by other sources, essentially confirming the strength of much of the intelligence within that file.

So, little Donny's Nunes' "big old vindication" is that the evil Steele Dossier is in fact verified, it was also not instrumental in the investigation into Russian collusion or Carter Page. It was lil' Papdupolous that turned the intelligence agencies towards Trump.

This is 2 + 2 = 4 stuff. But you're bitching in the corner that 2 + 2 = 7 for some reason, and crying when I don't believe you.

1) The memo "claims" the warrant would have never been obtained without the Dossier as evidence.

"Futhermore, Deputy Director MccCabe testified before the Committee in December 2017 that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the FISC without the Steele dossier information."

I think your misunderstanding of the memo is that critical facts about its source were not disclosed in the FISA application.

2) Lastly, the memo claims for the most part the Dossier was unverified. I think there is some question about what was actually verified. It could have been Steele as the source was all that was verified for all that we know.