Mueller talking to congress

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
It was also stated that No US Citizens were involved or colluded with the Russians in those efforts. I think everybody or at least most people know this is a fact and it happened during Obama's time in office.

If it happens again in 2020 it is on Trump's watch.
rofl!!! Writing your own version of history...lololol Where did it state no US citizen colluded......hmmmmmm
Rofl@blame Obama,...….hahahaaaaa
 

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
22,444
6,540
136
Makes no sense.

Let’s talk about the felonies. How do you feel about them?
It appears that the president in incapable of committing a felony. I have no idea what idiot came up with that idea, or why the DOJ accepts it, but that seems to be the insanity we're living with. So there are no felonies to discuss because Trump can't be charged. Isn't that just the neatest little bundle
This is not shocking at all. You are the kind of useful idiot that is required to continue looting the country.
Fuck off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pcgeek11

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
22,444
6,540
136
He really helped to string out Ben-fucking-ghazi forever, didn't he? Right wing conspiracy theorists went absolutely wild over it. Flood the public consciousness with bullshit whenever possible.
Unable to see the forest through the trees.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,725
17,376
136
It was also stated that No US Citizens were involved or colluded with the Russians in those efforts. I think everybody or at least most people know this is a fact and it happened during Obama's time in office.

If it happens again in 2020 it is on Trump's watch.

That is incorrect. Mueller stated that nothing could be proved due to either lying by witnesses, deletion of data, and the use of apps that kept no records and were encrypted.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
26,727
16,016
136
I really like Trey Gowdy. Pity he left congress.
Trey comes off as a reasonable guy some times... but then its like he remembers that his family is held hostage somewhere and he goes full ghazi'. Its weird.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,225
55,768
136
It appears that the president in incapable of committing a felony. I have no idea what idiot came up with that idea, or why the DOJ accepts it, but that seems to be the insanity we're living with. So there are no felonies to discuss because Trump can't be charged. Isn't that just the neatest little bundle

Fuck off.

I don’t think the president can be charged with a felony because the president says so doesn’t seem like a good argument to me.

What do you think?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,225
55,768
136
It was also stated that No US Citizens were involved or colluded with the Russians in those efforts. I think everybody or at least most people know this is a fact and it happened during Obama's time in office.

If it happens again in 2020 it is on Trump's watch.

Nothing in Muellers report stated that.

Where did you get this nonsense and why are you trying to mislead people into thinking it?
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,394
5,004
136
rofl!!! Writing your own version of history...lololol Where did it state no US citizen colluded......hmmmmmm
Rofl@blame Obama,...….hahahaaaaa

Mueller's statement quoted here:

“investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons knowingly and intentionally coordinated with the IRA’s interference operations”

The Obama administration was in charge of election security during the election.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,394
5,004
136
I reread Muellers statement. He did not say that.

Nothing in Muellers report stated that.

Where did you get this nonsense and why are you trying to mislead people into thinking it?

Sorry I didn't make an exact quote. What he said was this:

“investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons knowingly and intentionally coordinated with the IRA’s interference operations”

Not misleading in the least.
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
Sorry I didn't make an exact quote. What he said was this:

“investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons knowingly and intentionally coordinated with the IRA’s interference operations”

Not misleading in the least.
that is a lot different than what you said earlier........still trying to mislead people...…..add a few words here and there and then back tracj when what you just posted does not say without a shadow of a doubt there was no Americans involved...
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,725
17,376
136
I quoted his statement above...

Yeah and you left out the context.

https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/04/19/po...cryption/index.html?r=https://www.google.com/

S]ome of the individuals we interviewed or whose conduct we investigated -- including some associated with the Trump Campaign -- deleted relevant communications or communicated during the relevant period using applications that feature encryption or that do not provide for long-term retention of data or communications records," the report says.

"In such cases, the Office was not able to corroborate witness statements through comparison to contemporaneous communications or fully question witnesses about statements that appeared inconsistent with other known facts."

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/05/mueller/590467/

There is insufficient evidence to accuse the Trump campaign of criminal conspiracy with its Russian benefactors. However, “the social media campaign and the GRU hacking operations coincided with a series of contacts between Trump Campaign officials and individuals with ties to the Russian government.”


Read Mueller’s first public comments on the Russia investigation

These contacts were covered up by a series of lies, both to the special counsel and to Congress. Lying by the Trump campaign successfully obscured much of what happened in 2016. The special counsel in some cases “was not able to corroborate witness statements through comparison to contemporaneous communications or fully question witnesses about statements that appeared inconsistent with other known facts.” In particular, the investigation never did determine what happened to proprietary Trump-campaign polling data shared with the Russians.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,394
5,004
136
that is a lot different than what you said earlier........still trying to mislead people...…..add a few words here and there and then back tracj when what you just posted does not say without a shadow of a doubt there was no Americans involved...

I disagree, it is basically the same, granted I didn't quote nor did I say I was in my original statement.

What Mueller did say was quoted in my correction. They found No Evidence of ...

Without a shadow of doubt? Really?

So you want Mueller to prove a negative?
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,725
17,376
136
I disagree, it is basically the same, granted I didn't quote nor did I say I was in my original statement.

What Mueller did say was quoted in my correction. They found No Evidence of ...

Without a shadow of doubt? Really?

So you want Mueller to prove a negative?

Stop lying you fucking piece of shit!
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,394
5,004
136


That type of "context" would apply to nearly anyone considering the wide spread use of encryption apps, VPN services and messaging apps that doesn't retain data long term.

I myself use encryption and a VPN service that keeps no logs all the time. Everybody should.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
I disagree, it is basically the same, granted I didn't quote nor did I say I was in my original statement.

What Mueller did say was quoted in my correction. They found No Evidence of ...

Without a shadow of doubt? Really?

So you want Mueller to prove a negative?
"If we had confidence that the President did not commit a crime, we would have said so."
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,394
5,004
136
Stop lying you fucking piece of shit!


Not lying.

“investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons knowingly and intentionally coordinated with the IRA’s interference operations”

Thanks for living up to my low expectations.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,725
17,376
136
That type of "context" would apply to nearly anyone considering the wide spread use of encryption apps, VPN services and messaging apps that doesn't retain data long term.

I myself use encryption and a VPN service that keeps no logs all the time. Everybody should.

Oh and the widespread use of lies, don't forget that app.

Fucking moron.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,394
5,004
136
Oh and the widespread use of lies, don't forget that app.

Fucking moron.

Thanks again. Trump lies all the time. That isn't and wasn't a secret to anyone.

“investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons knowingly and intentionally coordinated with the IRA’s interference operations”
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Not lying.

“investigation did not identify evidence that any U.S. persons knowingly and intentionally coordinated with the IRA’s interference operations”

Thanks for living up to my low expectations.
Low expectations? Looks like you're the one defending a criminal as President. And all because of your precious feels.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,394
5,004
136
Low expectations? Looks like you're the one defending a criminal as President. And all because of your precious feels.


I only quoted what the Mueller report said. Make of it what you will.