Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Originally posted by: Cuda1447
You are my hero AMD!
Why?
Originally posted by: Cuda1447
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Originally posted by: Cuda1447
You are my hero AMD!
Why?
1. You helped my with my router problem.
2. You're freakin cool!
Originally posted by: HappyPuppy
A very few people in this world would prefer to squat over a hole out back than to have indoor plumbing.![]()
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Originally posted by: HappyPuppy
A very few people in this world would prefer to squat over a hole out back than to have indoor plumbing.![]()
I don't get it![]()
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Originally posted by: HappyPuppy
A very few people in this world would prefer to squat over a hole out back than to have indoor plumbing.![]()
I don't get it![]()
Your toilet gets clogged every once and a while, but overall it's better than the alternatives for most people.
Window's isn't without it's problems, but for a majority of users it's better than most alternatives.
Originally posted by: notfred
So they're saying the trademark isn't valid since it's just a normal English word?
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Lindows seriously needs to stop being a little crybaby and just make products that are better than windows.
Originally posted by: iloveme2
Originally posted by: notfred
So they're saying the trademark isn't valid since it's just a normal English word?
it appears that way
Gentoo > Windows > LindowsOriginally posted by: Xiety
Windows > Lindows.
All MS haters can go to hell.
Originally posted by: mattyrug
Originally posted by: iloveme2
Originally posted by: notfred
So they're saying the trademark isn't valid since it's just a normal English word?
it appears that way
Yes, in America, you cannot put a trademark, copyright, or claim ownership on any word in the English language. (or at least one in the Dictionary)
I got to thinking about things like that after I posted that... I'm not 100% sure, but my understanding is that they can use the name, but not claim any sort of ownership of it. They couldn't sue another company using the same name applied differently, because they can't put a trademark on a single word (that's the Dictionary). They could use a word combined with another word and copyright the phrase (I believe), like "Lucent Technologies", "Apple Computers", or "Apple Records".... Neither the Beatles or "Apple Computers" would own the word Apple, but has exclusive rights to "Apple Computers" or "Apple Records". If I started "Happle Records" I don't think there is nothing that Apple Records could do about it.... Had Microsoft trademarked "Windows Software" or something like that, it still wouldn't have helped them. Like I say I could be 400% wrong here...What about words like Lucent and Oracle?
Originally posted by: NuclearFusi0n
Gentoo > Windows > LindowsOriginally posted by: Xiety
Windows > Lindows.
All MS haters can go to hell.
Originally posted by: ThaGrandCow
Originally posted by: NuclearFusi0n
Gentoo > Windows > LindowsOriginally posted by: Xiety
Windows > Lindows.
All MS haters can go to hell.
For that 1% of the population that is trained on linux, yes.
For the rest of the population that was raised on Windows and it "just works" for them because that's what they know how to use, then no.
I'm all for Linux/OSS taking over, I'm even trying to convert myself over to it. Until I can install it on my computer and have my roomates and other people that use my computer even remotely know how to use it when sitting down at it, I will still always choose Windows. In most cases, it's worth the additional 1-2 crashes a month that Windows does over Linux in order to stay compatible and work for everyone that doesn't want to go to class again just to use a computer.
Agree with jelly 100%. I VERY BRIEFLY played with Linux in 99 because I had had it up to here (picture of the top of my head) with windows 98. But then windows 2000 came out, and I've not looked at Linux since. I won't until it makes WILD gains against MS, and I find that unfreaking likely, since MS has billions behind it and already a far superior OS for me and the vast majority of the population. For all intents and purposes 2000/XP do not crash. Unlike Linux they are infinitely more user friendly and have infinitely more support for both hardware and software. Linux is good only insofar as it mildly encourages MS to be more competitive.Originally posted by: BigJelly
Originally posted by: ThaGrandCow
Originally posted by: NuclearFusi0n
Gentoo > Windows > LindowsOriginally posted by: Xiety
Windows > Lindows.
All MS haters can go to hell.
For that 1% of the population that is trained on linux, yes.
For the rest of the population that was raised on Windows and it "just works" for them because that's what they know how to use, then no.
I'm all for Linux/OSS taking over, I'm even trying to convert myself over to it. Until I can install it on my computer and have my roomates and other people that use my computer even remotely know how to use it when sitting down at it, I will still always choose Windows. In most cases, it's worth the additional 1-2 crashes a month that Windows does over Linux in order to stay compatible and work for everyone that doesn't want to go to class again just to use a computer.
I understood the crashing argument before windows xp, but in three years of running xp i had exactlly 0 bs of d. MS haters are just pointless, but im all for linux because compitition drove MS to get a os that doesnt crash (XP). Furthermore ms os systems arent just renamed after a couple years later and resold, they are actually improved heavily. Face it windows is here to stay as the dominate os for the next decade or longer.
I'm perfectly fine with Windows, but that doesn't excuse MS of underhanded practices they're well known for.Originally posted by: vi_edit
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Originally posted by: HappyPuppy
A very few people in this world would prefer to squat over a hole out back than to have indoor plumbing.![]()
I don't get it![]()
Your toilet gets clogged every once and a while, but overall it's better than the alternatives for most people.
Window's isn't without it's problems, but for a majority of users it's better than most alternatives.
Originally posted by: notfred
So they're saying the trademark isn't valid since it's just a normal English word?
Yes, in America, you cannot put a trademark, copyright, or claim ownership on any word in the English language. (or at least one in the Dictionary)
