If they paid... but union bashing is the other half of the shit sandwich.
No union bashing required at all. You've got the small businessman employing illegals so he can get the same - or more - work done for less labor cost (and not have to deal with the @sshole Whitey and the joke work ethic Black), charges the same or less, has to do less/no work himself. The homeowner/business owner gets to participate in the greed and/or laziness by looking the other way, because ultimately, they don't give a shit about union people (even when they themselves are in a union) they just care about the job getting done for the least amount of money out of their pocket.
Politicians love it on both sides of the aisle, the Dems can get those less well off "immigrants" and their kids, who will vote Dem, plus, can get the Bleeding Heart/White Guilt and SJW crowds whipped up with dumbf*ck rationale like a picture of Sitting Bull on Facebook saying, Tell me again what the problem with immigrants is?, or some imbecilic shit like that. The Reps are more than glad to let them in, because they nor their kids will have to deal with the illegal invasion. They won't live by them, or have their kids compete with them (in any real numbers at least, at least short and mid term, who thinks long term right?), and they'll drive down the wages of Americans which lets their business buds pay less.
Who feels the pain? Middle income blue collar folks, and low income folks. They of course get F'd, but, hey, who gives a F about them anyways, right? Point this out and you'll get either a Bleeding Heart/White Guilter response, and/or, a "Well studies show..." Haaaaahvaad response. It's sufficient duhflection to keep that illegal invasion going. Critical mass enough to sustain it has been reached...
Yeh, the horror stories part, it's not my personal take on the issue. It's what's been coming out of the RNC noise machine and being parroted by those that aren't as well informed as you or most of the other conservative posters in this forum.
It's red meat meant for the rabid base, and the RNC can't seem to keep up with demand.
I do understand that there is a definite negative impact in the form of macro-economically depressing wages among others. However, as I have implied in my posts in this thread, big business and their "lust" for maximizing profit at the expense of the working class has much more to do with the influx of illegals than any other divertive reason the RNC has managed to cough up.
See above. And it's certainly not just big business (although letting in 10s of Millions of invaders sure does sure up the declining birthrates in our consumer driven economy, eh?), there are
tons of small business owners lovingly employing people who never should have been here. That small restaurant owner needs those illegals, if he didn't have them, my god, he'd actually have to work there himself (just like they did back in the day before the illegal invasion). Or the roofing company owner...lordy, he'd actually either have to be on that roof himself and/or pay legal labor to get up there and bust @ss - how will he afford his new F-250 diesel he absolutely must have to drive around in?! And on and on and on.
I prefer them over the US citizens in question honestly.
I don't blame you, I've been on jobs where the Americans are outright a joke - it's embarrassing. Latin workers are usually hard workers, respectful, etc. But that's really neither here nor there. The point is, our US Politicians should be ensuring we don't have an illegal invasion occurring (like they've been willfully allowing the past few decades). If the Fed Gov can't even secure our border with $300B in spending on the Mil each year, then frankly, we don't have a Gov worth supporting (politically, or, financially). I'd respectfully submit they've gone from looking out for the country they're elected to represent interests to...supporting
other interests. And those other interests sure aren't helping the US Citizens (middle and low income) who need the Fed Gov help the most.
It's really a trustability thing for me (and many others at this point): US Politicians have willfully sold out for decades now, so, which Politician can I actually trust the most?
Billary? <insert scream laugh> She's simply a non-starter. Bernie? Probably not on the illegal invasion topic but the thing about Bernie is, at least what comes out of his mouth isn't careful political calculation for the most political benefit - Bernie actually believes what he's saying. He might be wrong, he may have no way possible to get it enacted, but, at least he's true. And lastly, Trump. We really have little way of knowing
exactly what Trump believes. Rather than political calculation like Team Billary, it seems Trump just...talks. The real question is, when Trump actually has to get down to making decisions, dealing with issues that are bigger than him, will he be able to? With Bummer we had someone who was (in no particular order) experienced at voting Present, reading a teleprompter, smiling, wasn't Billary, and wasn't a white male - not really a glowing list of experience. Trump actually has some kind of Leadership experience. It may be abrasive and/or non-PC direct, but, that's really not necessarily a bad thing (unless one has SJW panic lost puppy meltdowns over non-PC non-filtered communication, then, it's the end of the world ((unless their comedian of choice does it, then it's totally cool))).
So, we're not going to get Bernie because of dumbf*ck and/or selfish Dems, we're going to get Billary. Between Billary and Trump, the lessor of two evils is Trump. Unless Bernie is smart and runs Independent. Or if Trump chooses Johnson as his running mate (and he accepts). Then maybe Trump if elected will announce it was a big joke, resign, and we get Johnson. Talk about making history...