Lurknomore
Golden Member
- Jul 3, 2005
- 1,308
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: southpawuni
Originally posted by: fierydemise
Originally posted by: southpawuni
Originally posted by: fierydemise
Your saying crossfire is a failure because it hasn't rebounded yet? How is it supposed to rebound before release?
Because ATI's research into it hasnt birthed anything worth purchasing yet.
It cant rebound yet. I was pointing out that currently, its a bigger failure than the 5800.
At least the 5800 led to the industrys leading GPUs of today.
You acknowledged that it can't rebound yet, so then how can you say that it is a failure because it hasn't rebounded?
It cant rebound because theres no improved product out yet.
The only reason it cant rebound yet is because ATI hasnt chosen to rebound from it yet. "Can't" might not be the best word, more like "ATI WON'T" rebound.
It certainly could rebound, ATI just doesnt care enough to become #1 and want to save some cash and remain #2.
Nvidia (after the 5800), spilled more cash and released better cards fairly quickly, then completely took over with the Geforce 6 and 7 series.
ATI, wont do this.
But maybe "can't" is the best word, if we agree on that verbage we are admitting to ATI's possibly being merely too inept to rebound quickly. Or maybe this is the best they can do?
Originally posted by: fierydemise
So now your assuming that ATI doesn't want the performance throne, everything ATI (and nVidia) do is to gain the performance throne and superiority in the minds of the consumer. Your calling Crossfire a failure based on your biased assumptions of ATI company policies. Fanboy anyone?
Originally posted by: M0RPH
Can I borrow your crystal ball? Cause I want to see what next year's video cards are like. Thanks.Originally posted by: southpawuni
Nvidia (after the 5800), spilled more cash and released better cards fairly quickly, then completely took over with the Geforce 6 and 7 series.
ATI, wont do this.
Originally posted by: southpawuni
Originally posted by: fierydemise
So now your assuming that ATI doesn't want the performance throne, everything ATI (and nVidia) do is to gain the performance throne and superiority in the minds of the consumer. Your calling Crossfire a failure based on your biased assumptions of ATI company policies. Fanboy anyone?
Um, well. Do you see any efforts to take the throne? What I'm seeing is their crappy R&D resulting in the worst product ever, Crossfire.. and they dont want to spend the money to hold off releasing it and do better.
So no, its easy to see that they dont want the throne apparantly at the current time.. they release an inferior product and everyone knows it.. and they "want" the throne so badly?
Well, you can "want" in one hand fierydemise and you can poop in the other.. both will do just as much good if you dont do anything.
Again, fanboy does not = recognizing a superior product.
Originally posted by: M0RPH
Can I borrow your crystal ball? Cause I want to see what next year's video cards are like. Thanks.Originally posted by: southpawuni
Nvidia (after the 5800), spilled more cash and released better cards fairly quickly, then completely took over with the Geforce 6 and 7 series.
ATI, wont do this.
It hasnt happened yet.
As far as wishing and hoping ATI produces something better than Crossfire?
Who cares, when pretty much the best way of doing it the way Nvidia did dual graphics with SLI?
If anything, all we'll see is a near direct copy of Nvidias current products.
Thats how behind ATI is.
Pretty much if they could switch technological positions with Nvidia, they would.
SLI > Crossfire and GF7 > anything ATI has
Yes, I do see ATI's efforts to take the throne... it's called R520 and it will give ATI the performance crown in approximately 6 days and 14 hours. That's what matters really, not SLI or Crossfire. You're placing way too much importance on these dual GPU solutions. Sure, people may buy the motherboards because they've been sucked into the marketing that it's a viable upgrade path. However, the VAST majority of people will never use the capability.Originally posted by: southpawuni
Um, well. Do you see any efforts to take the throne? What I'm seeing is their crappy R&D resulting in the worst product ever, Crossfire.. and they dont want to spend the money to hold off releasing it and do better.
So no, its easy to see that they dont want the throne apparantly at the current time.. they release an inferior product and everyone knows it.. and they "want" the throne so badly?
Originally posted by: southpawuni
Originally posted by: fierydemise
So now your assuming that ATI doesn't want the performance throne, everything ATI (and nVidia) do is to gain the performance throne and superiority in the minds of the consumer. Your calling Crossfire a failure based on your biased assumptions of ATI company policies. Fanboy anyone?
Um, well. Do you see any efforts to take the throne? What I'm seeing is their crappy R&D resulting in the worst product ever, Crossfire.. and they dont want to spend the money to hold off releasing it and do better.
So no, its easy to see that they dont want the throne apparantly at the current time.. they release an inferior product and everyone knows it.. and they "want" the throne so badly?
Well, you can "want" in one hand fierydemise and you can poop in the other.. both will do just as much good if you dont do anything.
Again, fanboy does not = recognizing a superior product.
Originally posted by: M0RPH
Yes, I do see ATI's efforts to take the throne... it's called R520 and it will give ATI the performance crown in approximately 6 days and 14 hours. That's what matters really, not SLI or Crossfire. You're placing way too much importance on these dual GPU solutions. Sure, people may buy the motherboards because they've been sucked into the marketing that it's a viable upgrade path. However, the VAST majority of people will never use the capability.Originally posted by: southpawuni
Um, well. Do you see any efforts to take the throne? What I'm seeing is their crappy R&D resulting in the worst product ever, Crossfire.. and they dont want to spend the money to hold off releasing it and do better.
So no, its easy to see that they dont want the throne apparantly at the current time.. they release an inferior product and everyone knows it.. and they "want" the throne so badly?
Originally posted by: Turtle 1
Another poster here seems to think all present nvidia cards will function in vista and will work with aeroglass with these cards . This is news to me and if that poster could supply a link were he got this information it would be a good thing.
Not according to the leaked benches we've seen. Where do you come by your information?Originally posted by: M0RPH
Yes, I do see ATI's efforts to take the throne... it's called R520 and it will give ATI the performance crown in approximately 6 days and 14 hours.
Not to me? Time will tell though. Back in the day, most enthusiasts had 3dfx SLI.That's what matters really, not SLI or Crossfire. You're placing way too much importance on these dual GPU solutions. Sure, people may buy the motherboards because they've been sucked into the marketing that it's a viable upgrade path. However, the VAST majority of people will never use the capability.
Originally posted by: Rollo
Originally posted by: Turtle 1
Another poster here seems to think all present nvidia cards will function in vista and will work with aeroglass with these cards . This is news to me and if that poster could supply a link were he got this information it would be a good thing.
If you're referring to me, I could care less what will work in Vista. I'll buy what does.
I'm not really planning my Christmas 2006 rig yet, my time machine is in the shop. :roll:
They did? You mean the benchs that were later proven to not even be using Crossfire, but instead only rendering 1/2 the frames?Originally posted by: fierydemise
Originally posted by: southpawuni
Originally posted by: fierydemise
So now your assuming that ATI doesn't want the performance throne, everything ATI (and nVidia) do is to gain the performance throne and superiority in the minds of the consumer. Your calling Crossfire a failure based on your biased assumptions of ATI company policies. Fanboy anyone?
Um, well. Do you see any efforts to take the throne? What I'm seeing is their crappy R&D resulting in the worst product ever, Crossfire.. and they dont want to spend the money to hold off releasing it and do better.
So no, its easy to see that they dont want the throne apparantly at the current time.. they release an inferior product and everyone knows it.. and they "want" the throne so badly?
Well, you can "want" in one hand fierydemise and you can poop in the other.. both will do just as much good if you dont do anything.
Again, fanboy does not = recognizing a superior product.
They had the performance crown before SLI and then they retook it in early june with Crossfire (prerelease), now 4 months later ATI no longer cares about the performance crown?
Originally posted by: Snakexor
cant you tell by rollos avatar he is a grumpy old man picking on college/hs students because his rig is better than theirs and he likes to make them jealous/mad?![]()
Originally posted by: southpawuni
They did? You mean the benchs that were later proven to not even be using Crossfire, but instead only rendering 1/2 the frames?Originally posted by: fierydemise
Originally posted by: southpawuni
Originally posted by: fierydemise
So now your assuming that ATI doesn't want the performance throne, everything ATI (and nVidia) do is to gain the performance throne and superiority in the minds of the consumer. Your calling Crossfire a failure based on your biased assumptions of ATI company policies. Fanboy anyone?
Um, well. Do you see any efforts to take the throne? What I'm seeing is their crappy R&D resulting in the worst product ever, Crossfire.. and they dont want to spend the money to hold off releasing it and do better.
So no, its easy to see that they dont want the throne apparantly at the current time.. they release an inferior product and everyone knows it.. and they "want" the throne so badly?
Well, you can "want" in one hand fierydemise and you can poop in the other.. both will do just as much good if you dont do anything.
Again, fanboy does not = recognizing a superior product.
They had the performance crown before SLI and then they retook it in early june with Crossfire (prerelease), now 4 months later ATI no longer cares about the performance crown?
Where do you get your information?
Either bad info, or you dont know as much about video as you are purporting to know.. which would make you not just a fanboy, but ignorant as well.
My preference of Nvidia is based within actual reasons.. not just because the "9700 roxhored!" and suddenly I'm a fan for life. Like half of the ATI fanboys in this forum.
Originally posted by: Turtle 1
Originally posted by: southpawuni
They did? You mean the benchs that were later proven to not even be using Crossfire, but instead only rendering 1/2 the frames?Originally posted by: fierydemise
Originally posted by: southpawuni
Originally posted by: fierydemise
So now your assuming that ATI doesn't want the performance throne, everything ATI (and nVidia) do is to gain the performance throne and superiority in the minds of the consumer. Your calling Crossfire a failure based on your biased assumptions of ATI company policies. Fanboy anyone?
Um, well. Do you see any efforts to take the throne? What I'm seeing is their crappy R&D resulting in the worst product ever, Crossfire.. and they dont want to spend the money to hold off releasing it and do better.
So no, its easy to see that they dont want the throne apparantly at the current time.. they release an inferior product and everyone knows it.. and they "want" the throne so badly?
Well, you can "want" in one hand fierydemise and you can poop in the other.. both will do just as much good if you dont do anything.
Again, fanboy does not = recognizing a superior product.
They had the performance crown before SLI and then they retook it in early june with Crossfire (prerelease), now 4 months later ATI no longer cares about the performance crown?
Where do you get your information?
Either bad info, or you dont know as much about video as you are purporting to know.. which would make you not just a fanboy, but ignorant as well.
My preference of Nvidia is based within actual reasons.. not just because the "9700 roxhored!" and suddenly I'm a fan for life. Like half of the ATI fanboys in this forum.
Actually its was an offical score done with 2 x850xtpe . So where do you get your info from Rollo
Originally posted by: Turtle 1
Actually its was an offical score done with 2 x850xtpe . So where do you get your info from Rollo I can't quit remember the scores but it was 15,500+ It was done at that hugh O/C bash ATI threw . other than sli ATI has owned nvidia since the R300 release .
Ati has not ans. the G70 yet but when it does ATI claim to the fastestest single card setup will stand from the R300 to the present. Now Asus is ready to release a dual core 7800 as a single card I bet your the type that thinks that should count. Crossfire has already taken the crown in X850 and 6800 Ultra class.
Of course we DO have official results NOW.. but I was originally responding to this claim in case you arent paying attention and just fanboying around (which you are).ATI distributed a special driver to their partners prior to the Computex launch that was designed to simulate CrossFire performance, by only rendering odd frames (effectively doubling the frame rate and simulating AFR performance). Although we can't confirm that we also ran with this driver back at Computex, chances are we probably did. But more importantly, the reviews you've seen where a pair of slave cards are used aren't actually testing CrossFire, they are simply simulating the performance of CrossFire by rendering half the frames.
Originally posted by: fierydemise
They had the performance crown before SLI and then they retook it in early june with Crossfire (prerelease), now 4 months later ATI no longer cares about the performance crown?
Originally posted by: Rollo
Originally posted by: Snakexor
cant you tell by rollos avatar he is a grumpy old man picking on college/hs students because his rig is better than theirs and he likes to make them jealous/mad?![]()
Quiet young whippersnapper! Back in the day, we didn't argue about video cards, because there was no electricity yet. So, we argued about which brand of candles would burn the brightest, last the longest, make your house smell best, and I remember one time when the iceman.....blahblah.......blahblah.....blah.......zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
z
Right, so now you don't want the best, just fun? Well I guess you'll be dumping your 7800 SLI and going with crossfire because that'll be fun and you'll also retract this thread as well?You still don't get it. I don't necessarily buy things because they're better than the last and I'm on some path toward the "best"- I buy things to try them out because it's fun to get new computer hardware.
Rollo 2004: I refuse to purchase a R4xx because it's the "same" technology as a R3xx and ATi is ripping me off.Actually I purchased TEN nV4x cards, they were a far more interesting product line.
And?That's nice, old games can be fun, but the graphics are lacking and there's a fairly large difference in playing Tribes 1 at 19X14 and playing HL2 at 19X14.
Sorry, telling you to play at 16xAF means I'm jealous of your rig? What the hell are you talking about? Next time try employing an adult argument and you might fare better.It certainly seems to as you waste no opportunity to note I should be playing at 16X AF, because you say so.
That was an analogy to show how ridiculous your stance is. And yes, there is a big difference at long range.It's not as big a difference as 3rd and 4th gear on a car,
LMAO. You're worried about a 1% performance hit on a 7800 SLI setup but you're only too happy to pimp soft shadows at 1024x768?and there is a performance difference
You know what I know? You're wrong.You know what I think? I think you're a jealous man who wishes he had the means to play with hardware like I do.
I don't need to discredit anything, your blatant trolling and fanboyism does that just fine. "I'm just poor collector and everyone is attacking me", then you make threads like this which are nothing more than another attack at ATi.Since you don't, you follow me around yelling "He liked the 5800!" and "He uses 8X instead of 16X!" to try and discredit the work I do for this community.
I'm sorry, but telling us 6800 SLI/6600GT SLI is viable means what exactly? At worst it's deceptive. At best it's spam.Whatever you think of me, please list the other members here who went out and bought four flavors of SLI and posted benches for the community on their own time?
That'll never happpen because you get your kicks from trolling. That's the whole reason you're here and that's why you create threads like this; when called out you respond with "you're jealous" and "my five year old has a better rig than you".To be honest, there are times petty little people like you make me want to just say "heck with it, I don't need this".
And if you weren't around we wouldn't need to ignore comments like 6600GT SLI/6800SLI is viable, soft shadows/FP HDR is viable and the 5800U doesn't have a noise problem.If there weren't people here who seem to appreciate my efforts, I would, and they'd be left with the likes of you telling them how it's wise to buy slower video cards, if they don't have a fan
Originally posted by: Cookie Monster
Just to point out, that even though the 5800 ultra or the hair dryer had IQ issues, people are badly misinformed about its performance being bad.
Although not good at DX9 games, in DX8.1 it often beat the 9700/9800 pro, or were equal. And OpenGL it still dominates. And back in those days, there was alot of DX8.1 games.
Yes, i did some research based on ATs reviews on the 5800 ultra, and it wasnt that bad of a performer against the 9700/9800 as many led me to believe.
Originally posted by: Cookie Monster
Just to point out, that even though the 5800 ultra or the hair dryer had IQ issues, people are badly misinformed about its performance being bad.
Although not good at DX9 games, in DX8.1 it often beat the 9700/9800 pro, or were equal. And OpenGL it still dominates. And back in those days, there was alot of DX8.1 games.
Yes, i did some research based on ATs reviews on the 5800 ultra, and it wasnt that bad of a performer against the 9700/9800 as many led me to believe.