More than 1 in 5 Trump SUPPORTERS think he will involve the US in a nuclear war

[0roo0roo]

I like that you take the time to demonstrate how stupid you are with as many graphics as possible.

Makes it easier for people to ingest.

It's funny, because the pictures are for your benefit, and I don't need to say why.

https://www.surveymonkey.com/survey-thanks/

 

[fskimospy]

It's funny, because the pictures are for your benefit, and I don't need to say why.

https://www.surveymonkey.com/survey-thanks/

They do paid surveys but this one clearly states it was a random digit dial survey.

Maybe we should start trying to teach you with pictures because you don't seem to be able to grasp it otherwise.

 

[Knowing]

I already did in my OP and my point has been proven just fine. It's not my job to go and disprove whatever asinine excuses you try to conjure up like peer reviewed election polls. (That still takes the cake)

Opinion polls have been peer reviewed. I don't know why this fact upsets you but you should probably reconcile it with your worldview.

 

[Knowing]

Information that was, unsurprisingly, presented in the OP.

Saying you don't believe it is one thing but saying it's not there is entirely another.

I clicked the link in the op. "Via surveymonkey" tells me next to nothing about the method.

 

[Commodus]

While we keep finding out these guys are #imwithher

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...ooter-caught-suspect-allegedly-turkish-origin

It's crass, tasteless and more than a little rich to try to bring down Clinton by pointing out that one mass shooter supported her, especially when there's nothing Clinton has proposed that would encourage his actions. Here's the thing: Trump has attracted legions of white supremacists (including key KKK figures) and anti-Muslim bigots (the kind that beat up Muslims in the street) because of his platform. Right now, the Clinton link is merely coincidental at best; the Trump link is undeniable.

It's going to be fun when Trump loses and you spend the next 4-8 years writhing in agony as empathy, tolerance and civil rights rule the day.

 

[0roo0roo]

They do paid surveys but this one clearly states it was a random digit dial survey.

Maybe we should start trying to teach you with pictures because you don't seem to be able to grasp it otherwise.

They do online surveys, even at the $5,000 check out mark they don't allow you to specify random dial.
I maybe wrong, but its not clearly stated on first glance, and the sparse data presented kind of indicates they are hiding something. All these surveys are garbage because anyone who values their time simply doesn't waste it doing online surveys, and hangs up on every marketer/pollster who calls.

I do wonder which salty bush pays for lincoln leaders...

It's crass, tasteless and more than a little rich to try to bring down Clinton by pointing out that one mass shooter supported her, especially when there's nothing Clinton has proposed that would encourage his actions. Here's the thing: Trump has attracted legions of white supremacists (including key KKK figures) and anti-Muslim bigots (the kind that beat up Muslims in the street) because of his platform. Right now, the Clinton link is merely coincidental at best; the Trump link is undeniable.

It's going to be fun when Trump loses and you spend the next 4-8 years writhing in agony as empathy, tolerance and civil rights rule the day.

Don't even pretend you didn't start this game by calling everyone the kkk.
What's fair is fair.
If we're going to play the deplorables ...its not just "one", its case after case

Dont even pretend to not know that the only two attempts on a candidate in this race were from your side.

 

[fskimospy]

The methodology of the poll clearly states it's random digit dial. As to your complaint that polls are useless I will just point you to the last several presidential elections where they basically nailed it.

Just say 'I was wrong'.

 

[0roo0roo]

The methodology of the poll clearly states it's random digit dial. As to your complaint that polls are useless I will just point you to the last several presidential elections where they basically nailed it.

Just say 'I was wrong'.

Where on the survey monkey page does it allow you to buy a random digit dial?

 

[fskimospy]

Where on the survey monkey page does it allow you to buy a random digit dial?

You do realize that they not only do mass market things but also contract to do scientific surveys, right? Read the poll methodology. Are they lying about it or are you stupid?

 

[0roo0roo]

Why so cryptic if you have the answers, where can you contract them for such services?

 

[fskimospy]

Why so cryptic if you have the answers, where can you contract them for such services?

I don't know, why don't you go look?

The poll clearly states it was a random digit dial poll. Are you claiming they are lying? If so, show evidence. If not, admit you were wrong.

Do I need to break out the pictures? I mean I guess you were stupid/mentally ill enough to be a gamergate person so maybe?

 

[fskimospy]

Also what is cryptic about 'read the poll methodology?' Lol.

 

[0roo0roo]

I don't know, why don't you go look?

The poll clearly states it was a random digit dial poll. Are you claiming they are lying? If so, show evidence. If not, admit you were wrong.

Do I need to break out the pictures? I mean I guess you were stupid/mentally ill enough to be a gamergate person so maybe?

When you refuse to answer simple questions, something is amiss.

 

[fskimospy]

When you refuse to answer simple questions, something is amiss.

This is pathetic desperation even for you. Either you are claiming they are lying about their methodology, thus destroying their business, or they are not.

Put up or shut up.

 

[0roo0roo]

yes I understand, you are doubling down on nothing to bump your thread.

Polls are propaganda, they only care that they are paid.

As you've already seen, people aren't too concerned with methodology.

 

[fskimospy]

yes I understand, you are doubling down on nothing to bump your thread.

Polls are propaganda, they only care that they are paid.

As you've already seen, people aren't too concerned with methodology.

That's funny, considering you questioned the methodology so apparently you cared until it made you look stupid.

 

[jackstar7]

Talk about doubling down on nothing. Oroooo, you self-owning dumbnuts.

 

[dead_smiley]

So what? The so-called Patriot Movement is a tiny loud mouthed media manipulating part of that. Shit talking fools.

Responsible & rational gun owners won't touch revolutionary bullshit with a pole. They have no reason to do so.

You do realize that the founding fathers intended we the people to put down a tyrannical government. They knew it would come back some day, hense the 2nd amendment.

Sent from my overpriced smartphone

 

[jackstar7]

You do realize that the founding fathers intended we the people to put down a tyrannical government. They knew it would come back some day, hense the 2nd amendment.

Sent from my overpriced smartphone

WWYBYWB?

 

[dead_smiley]

WWYBYWB?

I had to look that one up. I haven't been banned before from any forum. Are my remarks reason to be banned or do I need to step in line to avoid it?

Sent from my overpriced smartphone

 

[Victorian Gray]

yes I understand, you are doubling down on nothing to bump your thread.

Polls are propaganda, they only care that they are paid.

As you've already seen, people aren't too concerned with methodology.

You're funny.

 

[Jhhnn]

You do realize that the founding fathers intended we the people to put down a tyrannical government. They knew it would come back some day, hense the 2nd amendment.

Sent from my overpriced smartphone

They intended for the militia to protect the state & the people from threats foreign & domestic as in Shay's rebellion, the Whiskey rebellion & the Civil War. The notion that they intended to enable revolution down the road is revisionist history fantasy. The whole militia concept was abandoned when it proved defective in the war of 1812-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_1812#Unprepared

 

[dead_smiley]

They intended for the militia to protect the state & the people from threats foreign & domestic as in Shay's rebellion, the Whiskey rebellion & the Civil War. The notion that they intended to enable revolution down the road is revisionist history fantasy. The whole militia concept was abandoned when it proved defective in the war of 1812-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_1812#Unprepared

Seems I need to brush up on my history. Thanks for your post.

Sent from my overpriced smartphone

 

[Knowing]

They intended for the militia to protect the state & the people from threats foreign & domestic as in Shay's rebellion, the Whiskey rebellion & the Civil War. The notion that they intended to enable revolution down the road is revisionist history fantasy. The whole militia concept was abandoned when it proved defective in the war of 1812-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_1812#Unprepared

The second amendment references a 'free state.' The Constitution creates an intended distinction between the just powers of legitimate government and the rights of free men, 'people'.

Examine almost any post-adoption of the constitution quote about tyranny to see how domestic governments gone awry were intended to be dealt with.

 

[Jhhnn]

The second amendment references a 'free state.' The Constitution creates an intended distinction between the just powers of legitimate government and the rights of free men, 'people'.

Examine almost any post-adoption of the constitution quote about tyranny to see how domestic governments gone awry were intended to be dealt with.

It's perfectly clear that citizens were allowed arms to create a militia to defend the state, not overthrow it.

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

The notion that our own govt is or will become sufficiently repressive to spark a popular revolution is pure paranoid fantasy, anyway.